Mal12345
Permabanned
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2011
- Messages
- 14,532
- MBTI Type
- IxTP
- Enneagram
- 5w4
- Instinctual Variant
- sx/sp
Correct! Dominant?
As dominant as my wife.
Correct! Dominant?
As dominant as my wife.
I don't know your wife.
So does that mean you have gone back on your INFP typing for me? Not that you aren't allowed of course, just curious.
I know, that's why I said that.
I'm open-minded, contrary to what [MENTION=15773]greenfairy[/MENTION] stated about me.
I know that's why you said that, because I knew that by saying what I said, you would know to say what you said.
Well..ok. Not a straight answer, but it loosely answers my question I suppose.
Si auxiliary.
Now THAT answers my question.
Si-dom is too J for you.
I agree there. I don't necessarily care about N or S, but P and J....I am definitely not as J as I thought I was.
"Having a trunk in turn is a necessary condition of Nellie's being an elephant." So an elephant without a trunk, sad as that would be, is not an elephant?
And I didn't stop taking in information. This logic stuff isn't new information to me. For example, saying you're right just because you got an A in Logic is an example of bad logic and you didn't dispute it, because you know I'm right about that. And it doesn't speak very highly of the educational system these days.
But if you use the (possibly false) formula, your Si-aux means you're either an ESFJ or ESTJ.
Ah yes, for some reason I read what you put as tertiary. My mistake.
No you didn't.
stinking INFP
34% INFP
26% INTP
11% ENFP
11% INFJ
6% ISFP