G
garbage
Guest
This doesn't address the specific problem outlined in the OP, but it does address the topic question.
I've run into situations where I've made a couple of scattered points and drawn a conclusion, which is "right" in my own mind, but I didn't connect the dots so the entire argument is lost.
So, I think first and talk slowly, which isn't a "normal mode of operation" for me. I don't do this because I think they're stupid, but because it's much easier for me to communicate in a linear, sequential fashion that way. Otherwise, I'll "skip steps" and not communicate the entirety of what I want to get across.
This isn't just a "talk to sensors" mode; even N's can connect the dots differently than I do, and so it's helpful to allow them to see how I have connected them.
This mode of communication also helps me, because I'll know whether or not my logic is sound--it's a way of checking my intuition's work, as it were.
I've run into situations where I've made a couple of scattered points and drawn a conclusion, which is "right" in my own mind, but I didn't connect the dots so the entire argument is lost.
So, I think first and talk slowly, which isn't a "normal mode of operation" for me. I don't do this because I think they're stupid, but because it's much easier for me to communicate in a linear, sequential fashion that way. Otherwise, I'll "skip steps" and not communicate the entirety of what I want to get across.
This isn't just a "talk to sensors" mode; even N's can connect the dots differently than I do, and so it's helpful to allow them to see how I have connected them.
This mode of communication also helps me, because I'll know whether or not my logic is sound--it's a way of checking my intuition's work, as it were.