The Ü™
Permabanned
- Joined
- May 26, 2007
- Messages
- 11,910
- MBTI Type
- INTJ
- Enneagram
- 5w6
- Instinctual Variant
- sp/sx
You might be right, but global warming is a very bad example, perhaps because it's more of a future than present challenge? I think intuitives are probably more likely to care about and acknowledge it … That being said, you would probably have seen a larger difference between intuitives and sensors a few years ago, as global warming is being more and more accepted as a fact.
No, global warming is more a concern for SJs, methinks. Think of those old SJs who bitch about the youth. I'd say that sort of thinking could extend to global warming, the fear that the world is suddenly going to end.
I personally don't think global warming exists. I think it's yet more junk science to keep the public afraid.
An N probably wouldn't even care about global warming because they're big picture oriented -- and the big picture is that we're all gonna die anyway so why bother trying to save the world?
Experimental science, sure, but pseudoscience? I do like some peas with my carrots.
I'll concede, though, that whether a particular subject should be labeled as a pseudoscience may be open for debate.
I enjoy eugenics, which is only pseudoscience to appease the PC crowd.
I believe that certain races are inferior and certain races are superior. It's the same principle as certain breeds of dogs being more intelligent than other breeds. But once again, that's dismissed to appease the PC crowd who are just too afraid to handle the sad, sad reality.