What does it mean by objective? After learning Psychology it seems to me that there aren't objective reality at all. What we know what we sense what we think / feel are all censored by our brains -
Yup
what is objectivity? And for me, being objective is just following most ppl's decision (say, objectivity is the collective subjective view of majority). But for me, the most important thing is to make sense. "Objectivity" alone makes no sense to me.
adjective
1. undistorted by emotion or personal bias; based on observable phenomena; "an objective appraisal"; "objective evidence" [ant: subjective]
Yes, it's impossible to be truly objective, due to things like the "brain a jar argument", but for the most part, those are irrelevant. We can only operate under the observations we have, and we can only see this universe. Unless one offers a way out of the jar, then it is pointless to speculate otherwise.
Well I care for truth. Both on physical world & humanity. That's why I said I find it hard to define myself.
Everyone cares for truth, it's what aspects of it and how you go about it that differentiates.
Impersonal approach to life. Haha. What will you type Einstein? I bet INTP?
Maybe, but I've actually seen some arguments for him as an ENTP that seem somewhat plausible.
But he did embrace the world with passion. I don't want to sound hard, but you guys are giving me impression that people are just either T / P. And if you are a T, then you cannot even have emotion. This is absurd. I read Jung's Psychological Types so I think everyone knows it's a spectrum, not categories. So why can't a T have emotion?
No one in this thread has said anything like this. We all know and acknowledge this, especially the Ts who have responded to you. The only difference between T and F, is how you make your decisions. How much emphasis do you place on your emotions? Clearly we all have them and at some level all our actions are decided by them. But how deep do you have to dig?
And, well, I have a strong sense on morality, I admit it. But I'm not people-orientated. I was even labelled as rebellious.
Which sounds very Fi.
Fi - Internal moral code, recognizing and understanding one's own emotions.
Key word is internal. It certainly can (and will) be effected by the outside world, but its still a largely personal process. It judges things based on how it fits with its moral code, and if that moral code happens to contradict those of others in the world, then it takes a higher priority (unless one of the morals is to not judge other people or something).
(Also, Ts will tend to be low in this, and this contributes to the perceived unemotional-ness of them, as they don't recognize their own emotions. (And low Fe will mean they have a hard time expressing them when they do.))
I'm fine to be INFX, as long as people are giving sensible reasoning of that, but not something like "because I'm an INFP and I also do things that you do so you're an INFP."
I'll take your word for it. However, you give the appearance that you would rather be typed as a T...
Moreover, how can real INFPs cannot suit the profile? If a theory is describing the truth, then it should make good prediction and it should be coherent with our observations right? Then why should there be rooms for a description that fails to well describe a type? If this is the case, then 1. someone mistyped the so-call INFPs 2. the profile of INFP is inaccurate 3. the whole MBTI is just bullshit. I myself after reading some books, have ruled out the third already. I hope at least someone can tell me what's wrong with the profile or my type. And I know an INFP who suits the profile perfectly, while I have a lot which is totally different with her. That's why I come to seek the answer - I want to know who I really are (the truth!).
It's 2.5: The profile of INFP
can be inaccurate. (BTW, which profile are you referring to?) The biggest thing is as I outlined above, with Fi. Each INFP could have a radically different moral code. The descriptions of INFPs (and NFs in general) tend to paint a rosy picture of someone who loves everything and is eternally optimistic and unicorns and fairies and all that. But if a large part of the world contradicts the INFPs morals, then it could be the exact opposite.
Or, if I really sound like an INFP after this, then at least tell me the profile of INFP is seriously bad written. Or else please tell me that I'm like middle of T/F it's just I lean to F more.
You sound more INFP, for reasons I outlined above, but you also seem to have a fairly well developed T.
I'm not sure on my own judgement, so I need advice and some clarification on certain points.
I apologize if I sound really hard, but I have to admit that so far I haven't hear anything with good reasons yet.
Thanks a million again.
I'm not really sure what kind of responses you were hoping to get, but these are the kind you will get. We're offering our opinions as to what type we think you are, based on our experiences with the various types and the research we have done. But of course, most of us are amateurs here, plus, its especially hard to type someone online. If you don't like our responses, then you are free to disregard them.