I think that's what I meant by "conceptually". I've personally never come across the type, that proverbial feminist woman that does things to men akin to what PETA does to fur wearers. I'd imagine them so few and far between I can write the subset off as being incapable of rationalizing the subject.
Makes sense. It'd be easy pickings for those of us that made it through
You don't wash them, you go hunting >=)
Honestly,I don't have a strong opinion of don't allow people wear fur.
[Video removed - Patches]
Maybe I just don't like that personally .
But I don't think that's the image of"peaceful women" they want to publicize.
Quite hypocritical.
this is so last season, the latest episode of GoT shows it so much better, also it s a woman doing this
I wasn't a women's studies major or anything but I did take some classes and read quite a bit of feminist academic writing, and I can honestly say that the bolded is not really even close to what feminist scholars/writers say. A small subset, perhaps. I never really met anybody who agreed with them, though.
I never said that's what females should be doing. Who said I'm even a guy?
You make me remind nazi's glorify Hitler build highway.
They don't care the academic stance right or not,which nazi's care that?
They just attack people think different.
Makes sense. It'd be easy pickings for those of us that made it through
I think that's what I meant by "conceptually". I've personally never come across the type, that proverbial feminist woman that does things to men akin to what PETA does to fur wearers. I'd imagine them so few and far between I can write the subset off as being incapable of rationalizing the subject.
1. in the history of discussion boards, the "that's just my opinion" defense has never actually worked.
2. express an opinion about a movement that pushed to equality, you'll piss off the people who gained equality.
You sure that's "pushed to equality"?
meh, in the early 19th century the right of women to say no to marriage was being questioned & debated in britain. now we're debating wage difference statistics & cultural nuance. they did something right.
see that's always a problem: from the outside, you never know if the stance you hear most often in relation to a group is because it predominates the group, or because it's the loudest and most interesting (a.k.a. offensive) within that group.
just to be clear, what i am talking about is this sort of thing:
- everything violent is blamed on the patriarchy, a.k.a. "this is what happens when men are allowed to rule".
- women are portrayed to be as naturally egalitarian, thus better then the hierarchical males doh.
- correlations between gender inequality and human right violations are selectively picked.
- correlations between female leaders and wars initiated under their rule are explained as circumstantial.
etc..
so you're saying that's not the actual teaching, just the loudest nuts you hear about from the other side?
like i said, i really don't know.
Good lord unnamed, must you post a huge image to go with every single one of your posts?
It just for MANE.
1. in the history of discussion boards, the "that's just my opinion" defense has never actually worked.
but i've just said...
why are you expecting me to be the exception?
I don't really understand this thread... how can equal rights for women be a negative thing? Women are of equal worth to men (or I assume so as I have no reason to think differently) and should be treated as such. To suggest that Mary Wollstonecraft and "feminists" like her "suck" is, I think, rather stupid.
Also, I think the question of whether women are as violent as men is an entirely different topic, and has no relevance to feminism whatever...
Is feminism just synomynous with egalitarianism then? If it is why is egalitarianism not sufficient?
.
Basically, it's like saying all Christians are like Westboro Baptist, all Muslims are like Al Qaeda, all people that care about animal rights are like PETA, etc.
Is feminism just synomynous with egalitarianism then? If it is why is egalitarianism not sufficient?
I'm sympathetic to some sorts of feminism but over time I've been less sympathetic to all varieties, that said its a very, very diverse and disparity camp to try and generalise about like the OP, I gather, has.