Zarathustra
Let Go Of Your Team
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2009
- Messages
- 8,110
Nope
Lots of talk of ExFP's connecting dots, finding patterns etc. For the ESFP this is more geared towards people possibilities.
What does this mean to you? How do you see yourself visualising people possibilities?
also, What types of games do you enjoy? Why?
Do you have a theory for the rest of the types?
Well, maybe I could imagine having a sexless romantic relationship, but I certainly couldn't imagine surviving it. It would make me feel so unloved and insecure.
*thinks about what he always thought a "milkshake" referred to in that song*
*wonders if [MENTION=18819]nicolita[/MENTION] knows what that is*
[MENTION=18819]
What does this mean to you? How do you see yourself visualising people possibilities?
What do you mean with 'people possibilities'?
To be honest i'm not entirely sure, i was hoping you might be able to give some insight into it. Maybe it means more along the line of networking,forming friendship groups, seeing the potential in relationps/alliances...?
For me people possibilities means the same as other possibilities so i'm not sure how to distinguish it or weather it would be any different. I have just heard it said/read it a few times.
Well, I always try to get some sort of idea how people around me relate to each other, who's forming a clique with who, what's happening between people. I've never really thought about this actually. Seems normal to me?
[MENTION=4358]Jeffster[/MENTION]
Why do you need sex to make you feel loved and secure? I'm not picking on you, I'm genuinely curious.
Because if the one I'm romantically involved with doesn't want to have sex with me, it means he thinks I'm too ugly. That makes me feel insecure. And also, if he thought I was ugly and had sex with me anyway, it means he loves me for who I am. So being romantically involved with someone without sex means to me that he doesn't love me or find me attractive.
Even if he assured you that he did love you and found you attractive? What if he's got a physical problem that makes sex dangerous and/or impossible? Or it goes against his personal beliefs, whatever they may be? Would you automatically end a relationship over lack of sex?
If it goes against his personal beliefs, I'd end the relationship. The only people I know who do the abstinence thing are dogmatic creeps and I don't want to be involved with one, so this would be a no brainer.
If he had a physical problem, there are probably still things he could do, so I'd try to find alternatives with him.
During one class she started preaching about how living her life entirely for God brought so many miracles to her life (like how her dad stopped drinking?) and how people who don't believe in God are doomed to live a bad life. Starting preaching how non-religious families are doomed to be broken. I never really counted being non-religious as a big part of my identity, but that just pissed me off. So I was just sitting there and I had to listen to that bullcrap. I wasn't allowed to protest and all the other people in the classroom started praising that girl for being so inspiring and everything. And that's just the least extreme example. I also can't imagine someone like that becoming a good partner or parent. I know a girl whose father is exactly like that (very religious people aren't really common here) and he abused the crap out of his family. So I promised to myself that I'd only date atheists, agnostics and mildly religious people.
In those situations, I use sarcasm. I have no friends tho, so maybe it's not the best idea.
I hate when that happens, when they start insisting random things are true, then try to impose them on everyone. There are some people that can't function normally, or that will find themselves "giving into temptation" without religion, but that doesn't apply to everyone. And some people do a lot better (live a better life) without religion. I hate people like the one mentioned above, because they give people fuel to think that other religious people are the same. Not everyone thinks that way.