Jack Flak
Permabanned
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2008
- Messages
- 9,098
- MBTI Type
- type
You didn't, that was the jist I extracted, and apparently Nocapszy did the same.Whatchutalkinabout?
I don't recall saying that.
You didn't, that was the jist I extracted, and apparently Nocapszy did the same.Whatchutalkinabout?
I don't recall saying that.
Perhaps you could clarify?As I read the OP I thought about the "original," nature -oriented state of man and also that in many ways science has alienated us from that...
I've frequently read that as scientists get closer to understanding the mechanics of the Universe many of them are clarifying a undeveloped sense of spirituality.
Like I said, alienation isn't always incorrect.Alienation from nature?
I pose again the same question:For each to discover and define.
Remarkable -- I can recall being literally physically shocked; to where I was rendered incapacitated once I became cognizant of this -- how scarcely a person is aware of their own sentiment.You didn't, that was the jist I extracted, and apparently Nocapszy did the same.
No more F please.When Jack appealed to a higher authority I knew I was in trouble. . .
Like I said, alienation isn't always incorrect.
I didn't say it always is either, did I?
I pose again the same question:
How wonderful. What's stuff is the spirit made of?
We're talking about stuff here. Not imaginary wishywashy Feeler bullshit.
Does it exist? I'm asking you; do you genuinely believe that the spirit is something? Or do you merely encourage these spiritual things out of a moral, be it, or be it not arbitrarily derived.
I myself have never witness the stuff of the spirit. I can't account for its existence. I can only wish that it exists, but I've never found it.
Since it looks to me that are on the offensive here I will defend my position.
But the fact that we can't detect them directly does not mean much as an argument.
That is because we don't have technology that can detect it.
***************************************************
So in the end I will say that spiritual people have lost the battle with reality the only question that stays is - Will the same thing happen to science?
Trust me: If I was really curious, I'd read a book. Not post on a forum.And if you are genuninely interested Nocapszy
I'm not sure that's exactly it either.and not just arguing because your Tee needs some exercise
So then your use of this is to imply that you believe that the 90% of that stuff is spiritual matter?here is one response to your question from a scientific point of view:
Scientists know that ninety-some percent of the universe is "out there" but they can't identify or quantify it. Where is it? What is it? It's there. . .
You speak of the two as if they are polar opposites.Spend time explaining it away or give it some consideration. Your choice.
And just as consistently, there is a reason that excludes Heaven, Hell, and Spirituality from the cause.There always seems to be balance in the chaotic extremities which meet at the far ends, sorta like one concept of the universe.
As a matter of fact, the big bang is a falsity. It was a big bounce. Not literally -- I'll explain. Physicists are now working on cracking the mathematical code for the following underlying principle. The universe has 'pixels' so to speak. They're not really pixels at all, but they do share a key element.What was the enormous power that created the big bang in the theoretical void?
No two members can occupy these indivisible spaces, be they lights, or sub-atomic particles respectively.
That is to say, once two objects attempt to be contained by the same cosmic pixel, their gravity actually reverses, and instead pushes the objects apart from one another.
As the particles of the universe, in its previous incarnation was drawn into one another by each other's gravity, the condensation triggered the reversal of the force, and the 'bounce' effect.
These physical constituents of the universe have always existed, and have always bounced inward and outward.
See Scientific American's article on the big bounce
My greatest triumph and failure is the inability to prioritize beyond my own interests. Everything is pointless unless it's got my attention, in which case is is MVP.Ah. Gravitometrics, eh?
5th dimensional bodies. Nocapszy, you cad. I didn't know you enjoyed such pointlessness!
If only we could watch the little shits. But they are cloaked.Gravity is a composite unit. A puzzle piece that fits (crudely at this point in our comprehension of it) into the tapestry of our multi-dimensionality.
CERN is looking to control these quirky little devils - gravitons - as a byproduct of their Hadron piece.
A vain one, too.Within the context of cosmology, gravity is king. A bully even.
Maybe.Think of the energy potential if we were able to manipulate the fundamental particles that gave rise to gravity. Even (space)time is trumped.
I'm not certain I do, Super Mario.A singularity, if you catch my drift. What say you, Kurzweil?
For 200,000 years our horizon was limited by our size.