- Nov 6, 2019
The question as per the title. =(
Well, this just means our types are not exactly by the book, and requires more in-depth analysis of MBTI theory to really get (it is incomplete after all). But you can start by looking up jumper type, or "loop theory". I technically type as an ISTP, but I don't express Se. Thus I put down Ti-Ni to show my jump.
Ditto to what Tehb says (I technically go as INTP myself). I definitely show and utilize Ne, but seem to lean more heavily on Si in a neurotic sort of fashion. Mbti is a pretty inconsistent theory with an excessive number of versions, so I typically go with a modified version of the popularized version of it (in that there are valued functions that pair with one another, but some level of stack flexibility greater than the usual; The Objective Personality System of mbti is another thing you can look into for "jumper types" being an allowed preference (even though that theory has a way to go developmentally), I think the original jungian theory also stacked IIEE/EEII (in terms of function extro/introversion)
Someone once copy/pasted an old signature I had deleted ages ago, but they used it in a mocking way. The only way they could've still had it was if they used it to talk about me behind my back. Just one example. I think those kinds of people are ultimately the minority, and they don't matter. It's just people being petty no-lifes. My point is, I'm not just being skeptical or paranoid about others or suspecting all these different people around me or whatever. I'm saying this based on actual, proven occurrences.In addition to what has been posted, some people have nothing better to do besides using it as materials for gossip. Just being realistic.