Dr Mobius
Biting Shards
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2010
- Messages
- 872
- MBTI Type
- ENTP
- Enneagram
- 7w8
- Instinctual Variant
- sp/sx
[MENTION=1206]cascadeco[/MENTION]
ISFP 4w5 sp/so/sx
Continuing the trend of ISFP e4s knowing themselves; I have never thought you were anything other than advertised. The general calm demeanour juxta positioned against spikes of unseen beliefs and ideas.
The self-analysis typical of an e4 but somehow more detached, objective. Sorry I don’t think I have a lot to add to e4s understanding honestly.
[MENTION=31348]Peter Deadpan[/MENTION]
ESXP 6w5 sx/so/sp
Enneagram has always been the most obvious; head energy tends to be obvious. E6s often have this interesting competing drive when it comes to typology. One is to emphatically define themselves and the other is to reach a stage of knowledge safety. It creates a revolving door of types; settle on type, new knowledge, new type etc. Typically one wins out; if the type wins out its much smoother sailing. The knowledge side is much messier there is a reason that socionics and those fringe cult/scam that rant on about their absolute truth are dominated by e6s. The sheer belief wipes out the cycle. I once saw a guy use numerology to prove his socionics theory hands down one of the most idiotic things I’ve seen on the internet. He craved that respect that comes with knowledge; all that time would have been better spent on actual education.
Sexual first has always seemed obvious, social second simply because the lack of a safety filter is a fundamental aspect of sp lasts. And from a sp first kind of terrifying.
Type I’m less confident on; I know what you’re not. The lack of Ne is palpable I don’t think seen anyone whose syntax is so unambiguous. Ne jumps in highly excitable Ne users can make communication difficult. Your text is always clear cut and always directly applicable to context of the conversation. The only other user I can honestly think of that does the same is Whatever. Even your random insight thread is observation where the context is easily understood.
[MENTION=17945]Stell[/MENTION]
ISFP 4w5 sx/sp/so
The curse of the ISFP strikes again. I think you are correctly typed. Though I think you are the only repressed sx I think I’ve meet. You have inverse feel to cascadeco a coiled spring vibe to her smoothness. Apart of me is curious what would happen if you were released. Once again I find myself with little to add unfortunately.
ISFP 4w5 sp/so/sx
Continuing the trend of ISFP e4s knowing themselves; I have never thought you were anything other than advertised. The general calm demeanour juxta positioned against spikes of unseen beliefs and ideas.
The self-analysis typical of an e4 but somehow more detached, objective. Sorry I don’t think I have a lot to add to e4s understanding honestly.
[MENTION=31348]Peter Deadpan[/MENTION]
ESXP 6w5 sx/so/sp
Enneagram has always been the most obvious; head energy tends to be obvious. E6s often have this interesting competing drive when it comes to typology. One is to emphatically define themselves and the other is to reach a stage of knowledge safety. It creates a revolving door of types; settle on type, new knowledge, new type etc. Typically one wins out; if the type wins out its much smoother sailing. The knowledge side is much messier there is a reason that socionics and those fringe cult/scam that rant on about their absolute truth are dominated by e6s. The sheer belief wipes out the cycle. I once saw a guy use numerology to prove his socionics theory hands down one of the most idiotic things I’ve seen on the internet. He craved that respect that comes with knowledge; all that time would have been better spent on actual education.
Sexual first has always seemed obvious, social second simply because the lack of a safety filter is a fundamental aspect of sp lasts. And from a sp first kind of terrifying.
Type I’m less confident on; I know what you’re not. The lack of Ne is palpable I don’t think seen anyone whose syntax is so unambiguous. Ne jumps in highly excitable Ne users can make communication difficult. Your text is always clear cut and always directly applicable to context of the conversation. The only other user I can honestly think of that does the same is Whatever. Even your random insight thread is observation where the context is easily understood.
[MENTION=17945]Stell[/MENTION]
ISFP 4w5 sx/sp/so
The curse of the ISFP strikes again. I think you are correctly typed. Though I think you are the only repressed sx I think I’ve meet. You have inverse feel to cascadeco a coiled spring vibe to her smoothness. Apart of me is curious what would happen if you were released. Once again I find myself with little to add unfortunately.
