User Tag List

First 275675725765773774775776777 Last

Results 7,741 to 7,750 of 7763

  1. #7741
    Senior Member awbro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    MBTI
    INFP
    Enneagram
    369 sp/so
    Posts
    460

    Default

    @Charus:

    INTP seems right.

    Whaddya say?

  2. #7742
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    MBTI
    ESxP
    Enneagram
    ? sx/so
    Posts
    50

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LEGERdeMAIN View Post
    Clearly an ISTP.
    Interesting because I've taken a break for a while and really think that I'm an ISTP 9w8 or 6w5. I really resonate to characters and people who share that type/enneagram. If I may ask what made you come to that conclusion?

  3. #7743
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    8,072

    Default

    @Vendrah seems ST, S-dominant. Lots of straight info and data, high investment in metrics and provability (Te). I'm uncertain at this point if this is SeTe or SiTe, but I lean SiTe because of an apparent discomfort with things (information, definitions, etc) not aligning with what is known and previously defined. He also seems to be building a system based from information already available rather than actively seeking out novel information/experience, so SiTe would make sense.

    I don't claim to be an expert on function typing, but ST is really all I'm seeing.

    S and N dominants have "missing information/missing picture" syndrome and tend to only see half the board. This is not an insult... all types have an equal deficit in some way.

  4. #7744
    Inactive For A Bit RadicalDoubt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    MBTI
    ISFJ
    Enneagram
    5w6 sp/so
    Socionics
    LII Ti
    Posts
    1,134

    Default

    @awbro I think the ISFJ typing fits you better than ENTP from what I've seen from you (although I could easily see ISTJ or INTP with accented Si working for you as well based on our interactions). I only mention this because I see you've retyped as such.
    Likes awbro liked this post

  5. #7745
    Remember, Humanity. Vendrah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    MBTI
    ANFP
    Enneagram
    592
    Posts
    888

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Saprophytic Aphrodite View Post
    @Vendrah seems ST, S-dominant. Lots of straight info and data, high investment in metrics and provability (Te). I'm uncertain at this point if this is SeTe or SiTe, but I lean SiTe because of an apparent discomfort with things (information, definitions, etc) not aligning with what is known and previously defined. He also seems to be building a system based from information already available rather than actively seeking out novel information/experience, so SiTe would make sense.

    I don't claim to be an expert on function typing, but ST is really all I'm seeing.

    S and N dominants have "missing information/missing picture" syndrome and tend to only see half the board. This is not an insult... all types have an equal deficit in some way.
    EDIT: "Softned" the message.

    I had create 3 different systems of typing, personally I am actually on the 6th but 3 remain in private.
    I am the guy swimming against the current.
    So that must be Si and Te, right? Super traditional! Well, not really.

    Anyway, I dont think we should extend this conversation, because I know you are extending an unhappy conversation that comes from the Sum Typing thread and another part coming from the graveyard. I know you didnt came here to clarify my type - that is super obvious. I rather not even try to figure out your motives here because I fear what they might be.

  6. #7746
    Remember, Humanity. Vendrah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    MBTI
    ANFP
    Enneagram
    592
    Posts
    888

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RadicalDoubt View Post
    @awbro I think the ISFJ typing fits you better than ENTP from what I've seen from you (although I could easily see ISTJ or INTP with accented Si working for you as well based on our interactions). I only mention this because I see you've retyped as such.
    @awbro is super difficult to type XD.
    I had suggested EXXP earlier, but I am somewhat unsure.

  7. #7747
    filling some space UnitOfPopulation's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    MBTI
    ENTJ
    Posts
    3,354

    Default

    I've been mistyped as something, whereas I'm a fake in everything. Sorry.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    Likes awbro, RadicalDoubt liked this post

  8. #7748
    Primadonna Girl miss deceit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    324

    Default

    Hmm, out of the people on this page:
    @RadicalDoubt I'm not saying it's impossible, but I am curious as to why you type as ISFJ in MBTI yet LII in Socionics. The main reason I ask of this is because the way you communicate reminds me a lot of Robo/Bismuth's forum posts, have you considered being SEI in Socionics?
    @awbro Idk what you are, but reading through the way you explain certain things I'd just go broadly with IxxJ of some sort for now.

    Charus I believe to be an IxFP of some sort based on interactions I have had with the individual on other forums.

    If anyone has any typings of me, bring em on.

  9. #7749
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    8,072

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Vendrah View Post
    EDIT: "Softned" the message.

    I had create 3 different systems of typing, personally I am actually on the 6th but 3 remain in private.
    I am the guy swimming against the current.
    So that must be Si and Te, right? Super traditional! Well, not really.

    Anyway, I dont think we should extend this conversation, because I know you are extending an unhappy conversation that comes from the Sum Typing thread and another part coming from the graveyard. I know you didnt came here to clarify my type - that is super obvious. I rather not even try to figure out your motives here because I fear what they might be.
    I'm actually not upset about anything, other than the fact that the mods continue to take an authoritarian approach to censoring the forum and exerting control where none is needed. I don't dislike you, nor am I "out to get you". I actually went back and edited my own message after the fact to soften some edges as well, not because I intended to be harsh originally, but because I don't always filter things that way in the first place. Also, like I said, I claim no super powers for typing functions. I can see certain things pretty clearly, but sometimes it takes me awhile to filter through details or nuances.

    I was unaware that you had developed so many systems. I think that would potentially lead me to conclude Se is more appropriate. I would still stick with Se for the time being because all I'm really seeing from you is pretty concrete stuff.

    For the record, I'm not in the "intuitives are better than sensors" camp, so if for some reason you felt offended, just know that that's not a message I deliver.

    You certainly don't have to agree with me. I wouldn't if someone said some shit to me that didn't make sense (although I also don't feel offended by others' typings of me anymore... it's not super personal or tied to my identity). You also don't have to like me if you don't want to.
    Likes awbro liked this post

  10. #7750
    Inactive For A Bit RadicalDoubt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    MBTI
    ISFJ
    Enneagram
    5w6 sp/so
    Socionics
    LII Ti
    Posts
    1,134

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by miss deceit View Post
    Hmm, out of the people on this page:
    @RadicalDoubt I'm not saying it's impossible, but I am curious as to why you type as ISFJ in MBTI yet LII in Socionics. The main reason I ask of this is because the way you communicate reminds me a lot of Robo/Bismuth's forum posts, have you considered being SEI in Socionics?
    I have considered it and am actually looking into the possibility currently. Definitions of the functions from mbti to socionics differ to a notable degree. Currently, it's easier to see myself in Ti than Si (as I'm very quick to neglect my personal comfort and socionics Si really gets into the more abstract attentiveness to sensation and having like, deep impressions of things which is something I don't experience at all whereas mbti Si is a bit more watered down and defines a style of thought I guess). I also have difficulty seeing high dimensional Fi (and have considered and been video typed as Fi polR before) because, like Se, how Fi is described in socionics is completely foreign to the way I experience the world. Nonetheless, I know considerably less about socionics than the mbti, so as I get deeper into it I may realize I'm wrong and type as something else (ie. IEI, SEI, maybe even SLE may be alternative possibilities if LII seems incorrect, I just have to get more versed in the theory as I've had very little time with school to do so). People tend to vary on their mbti type and socionics type, but I can definitely see how my variance might be too separated to work. In terms of mbti anyways, I tend to consider myself somewhat of a jumper anyways (ie. With the more fluid stack/what I've heard about objective personality I may be Si-Ti-Other functions rather than truly high/well developed Fe).

    “My deplorable mania for analysis exhausts me. I doubt everything, even my doubt.” Gustave Flaubert
    | 5w6 3w4 9w1 sp/so |
    Likes miss deceit, awbro liked this post

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO