Mistyped TypeCentral Members

[Ghost]

What's your basis for disregarding the potential existence of a TJ preference in my personality? Or the enneagram 5 for that matter?

My basis is vague and loose, but I'll do what I can.

I don't get Te at all from you. If you have it, I'd expect it to be inferior. Your style of self-revelation doesn’t fit with TJs I know. Even when they talk about their inner workings, there's a sense of detachment that goes with it. Instead, they seem to prefer talking about their methods.

Your prolific threads and posts also make me think of a perceiver. I feel like a J would be more focused. There's something haphazard in your approach, like you don't know how to say whatever it is you're trying to say.

Ni-doms, to me, have a more stable foundation to their philosophies. It often runs through their posts.

I also feel that when INTJs debate people, they use opposing points to inform their own argument. Even when they're set on a position, they're constantly building their case. You don't seem to do that. You seem to be satisfied with having an idea in and of itself and not with its implications. Then you expect others to share their reasoning, after which you sometimes give a simple or dismissive response, supposing you give one at all. It comes across as petulant to me, and I associate that with Ps more than Js.

I don't actually have a good reason for ruling out 5. Hehe.

I love you Ghost darling.

[Scapegoated 4 fun]

My basis is vague and loose, but I'll do what I can. I don't get Te at all from you. If you have it, I'd expect it to be inferior. Your style of self-revelation doesn’t fit with TJs I know. Even when they talk about their inner workings, there's a sense of detachment that goes with it. Instead, they seem to prefer talking about their methods. Your prolific threads and posts also make me think of a perceiver. I feel like a J would be more focused. There's something haphazard in your approach, like you don't know how to say whatever it is you're trying to say. Ni-doms, to me, have a more stable foundation to their philosophies. It often runs through their posts. I also feel that when INTJs debate people, they use opposing points to inform their own argument. Even when they're set on a position, they're constantly building their case. You don't seem to do that. You seem to be satisfied with having an idea in and of itself and not with its implications. Then you expect others to share their reasoning, after which you sometimes give a simple or dismissive response, supposing you give one at all. It comes across as petulant to me, and I associate that with Ps more than Js. I don't actually have a good reason for ruling out 5. Hehe.

Nah.

[Ghost]

You seem to be satisfied with having an idea in and of itself and not with its implications. Then you expect others to share their reasoning, after which you sometimes give a simple or dismissive response, supposing you give one at all.

Nah.

You could try to be less predictable. How disappointing.

[Scapegoated 4 fun]

You could try to be less predictable. How disappointing.

Nah.

[tchudak]

I coming to the conclusion that @Scapegoated 4 fun is here with the only purpose to troll. You shouldn't take him seriously.

[Red Ribbon]

I coming to the conclusion that @Scapegoated 4 fun is here with the only purpose to troll. You shouldn't take him seriously.

Well he's not doing a good job in convincing anyone he's an INTJ. I'm more INTJ than he is because I have actual Te.

[Smilephantomhive]

I coming to the conclusion that @Scapegoated 4 fun is here with the only purpose to troll. You shouldn't take him seriously.

He's gotten into at least 10 arguments on here, so you may be right.

[Lord Lavender]

I was wondering which do people think im more Sp/So or So/Sx overall.

[Metis]

thepink-cloakedninja ISFP

[Frosty]

I was wondering which do people think im more Sp/So or So/Sx overall.

So/sx

You are so silly.