Scapegoated 4 fun
Permabanned
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2017
- Messages
- 238
- MBTI Type
- INTJ
- Enneagram
- 5
Of course you can take this with a grain of salt but for the funny fun - INxP
?
Of course you can take this with a grain of salt but for the funny fun - INxP
It means guessing your type on the internet, (frivolously, of course) I think you're either an INTP or an INFP
I don't see Ne in [MENTION=33958]Scapegoated 4 fun[/MENTION] at this point in time.
Nah, it's not sensors or you in particular, it's just a tendency I've noticed in people in general to reject information that doesn't have hints of emotional bias in it. Why? I don't really understand it either, but if I had to guess, it's probably because they are most comfortable with emotionally biased, "simple" explanations for things because they relate to it strays from being too heavy or deep, which would make them feel inadequate because they aren't used to having to analyze information on that level
Yeah, you must not be familiar with either the INTJs tendency to troll, or the INTJs tendency to deliberately dumb down their thoughts in order to appeal to the average person's intellectual capacity. You can't take what someone writes on a post online and use that as a basis to type them, unless you know exactly what they were thinking when they put it down/why they put it down the way they did/whether they were being 100 percent naturally themselves when they wrote it etc.
So far I think hes an INTP not INTJ. I see clear Ti/Si in the way he nitpicks logic and ISFJ is out of the window as I dont see any Fe but rather traces of Ne so an INTP Ti subtype seems most likey atm.
I've tried therapy but I couldn't feel comfortable talking to them about myself because I don't want to burden them with my extensive problems, and I don't feel paying someone to listen to you/give you advice is particularly natural or healthy. Also, about the feeler thing; I don't think they're all out to manipulate me or anything like that, I've just found them to be very quick to anger if I do something they don't like (even if I don't know that what I did was wrong.). So it's more that I don't trust them very much to be there for me because they are often so self preoccupied that they don't see beyond their own immediate wants/needs and ive had the experience of them becoming jealous of me often and going out of their way to be vindictive/mean to me when I didn't even intentionally do anything to harm/offend them. I don't really trust opening up to them because I feel they take other people for granted sometimes
Go fuck yourself, closet-dykeInformation is fact. It is objective. Facts don't have feelings. You don't sound like a Te user at all. You reject information that does not fit your narrative, which is the opposite of what a Te user does. You dismiss anecdotal evidence from others but your entire premise is based on anecdotal evidence. Te users do the opposite of what you do. There is no one system, there are multiple systems. Te takes in all the facts. You are not smarter than any individual on the planet based on type alone. Your respond to me saying I'm not familiar with INTJs without taking into account the years of study I have put into MBTI and Socionics. This is an incredibly weak defense for the post I made earlier. I don't believe he leads with Ti. Look at this post: This is a person who believes feelers to be bad, makes several threads asking us if we agree with him. When told we don't, he gets into debates with us without being able to back up his claims without any kind of facts. While I do agree that twisting outward reality to fit internal systems is a Ji trait, I don't believe this is Ti. Ti doms usually also have very good grasp of Te while this person is a weak Te user. I think this person is ironically, a feeler himself. The post I quoted above regarding feelers just reeks of Fi to me. Fi users have Ti role function and can look like Ti users when one first meets them. I do see Ni from this person as well which is why I type him as ISFP. Anyway I suppose we can all agree his dominant function is Ji and not Pi. IxxP for sure. Dear Scapegoated, You asked why I think you are an ISFP and here is why. Don't bother responding to this post since I have lost interest in debating this honestly.
Go fuck yourself, closet-dyke
Information is fact. It is objective. Facts don't have feelings. You don't sound like a Te user at all. You reject information that does not fit your narrative, which is the opposite of what a Te user does. You dismiss anecdotal evidence from others but your entire premise is based on anecdotal evidence. Te users do the opposite of what you do. There is no one system, there are multiple systems. Te takes in all the facts. You are not smarter than any individual on the planet based on type alone. Your respond to me saying I'm not familiar with INTJs without taking into account the years of study I have put into MBTI and Socionics. This is an incredibly weak defense for the post I made earlier. I don't believe he leads with Ti. Look at this post: This is a person who believes feelers to be bad, makes several threads asking us if we agree with him. When told we don't, he gets into debates with us without being able to back up his claims without any kind of facts. While I do agree that twisting outward reality to fit internal systems is a Ji trait, I don't believe this is Ti. Ti doms usually also have very good grasp of Te while this person is a weak Te user. I think this person is ironically, a feeler himself. The post I quoted above regarding feelers just reeks of Fi to me. Fi users have Ti role function and can look like Ti users when one first meets them. I do see Ni from this person as well which is why I type him as ISFP. Anyway I suppose we can all agree his dominant function is Ji and not Pi. IxxP for sure. Dear Scapegoated, You asked why I think you are an ISFP and here is why. Don't bother responding to this post since I have lost interest in debating this honestly.
Maybe I should say, (as far as his forum type goes since we don't know him offline..but).. You make a very good case, here. One thing I do think he lacks/skips over are facts, even to make his own subjective viewpoints more solid. The reason I suggested INxP is because he seems to be scattered, jumping from post to post & hinted at the fact that he may have been trolling us all in one of his posts. If he were to be trolling, it would make things more difficult to figure.
The reason I gave the trolling a tad bit of thought is because, no disrespect..but I found myself thinking, quite a few times, "Nobody can seriously be that stupid."
It's not that I think T is smarter but the constant overlooking of the great logical arguments that people put up against him/her starts to become inhumane. (Whether T or F.)
That last remark though, calling someone a closeted dyke..that sounds like someone who doesn't care to look at the argument before them.... which was well put together & made sense.. So either that's an F of some sort or a troll..
No need for hostility. I was not being hostile to you.
...If he were to be trolling, it would make things more difficult to figure....
...So either that's an F of some sort or a troll..
Bingo: My troll personality is that of an extremely stereotyped F. I highlight/exaggerate all the behaviors that REALLY annoy me in F's like lacking a logical argument but still believing you are right out of pure self-assuredness, or the tendency to attack others on an emotional level for sharing a different opinion than them and openly disagreeing with theirs.
What makes you think you are more of an INTJ instead of an INTP?Bingo: My troll personality is that of an extremely stereotyped F. I highlight/exaggerate all the behaviors that REALLY annoy me in F's like lacking a logical argument but still believing you are right out of pure self-assuredness, or the tendency to attack others on an emotional level for sharing a different opinion than them and openly disagreeing with theirs.
What makes you think you are more of an INTJ instead of an INTP?
Okay, fair enough. What makes you think you're INTJ over ISTJ?I get frustrated with inaccuracy, I get frustrated when my plans/routines are interrupted, I don't enjoy exploring concepts for the journey, I usually explore concepts for the sake of reaching a conclusion about something or to decide what to do about something. I'm also much more focused on my personal relationships than most INTPs I've known, I'm more relationship-oriented. Also, disorganization/disorder/chaos in my environment really stresses me out and I usually have to be alone after being in an environment like that. I also have extremely bad obsessive compulsive tendencies, worse than pretty much anyone I know.
Okay, fair enough. What makes you think you're INTJ over ISTJ?
I think I mistyped myself as an ISTP but actually I'm an INTP
I'm not as dogmatic as most ISTJs I've met and I don't readily bend over for authority figures just because they are "authority figures". I am generally less impressed by one's "rank" than I am with who they are as an individual/their opinions/thoughts/motives etc. Also, I've noticed ISTJs have somewhat of a need for external approval, something which I pathologically lack. - - - Updated - - - That seems to make more sense based on what I've seen from you.