learning styles and mbti??

[liYA]

learning styles

abstract random is NF
abstract sequential NT
concrete random SF
concrete sequential ST

what about...

naturalistic
intrapersonal- fi?
interpersonal
linguistic
visual-spatial
logical mathematical
bodily kinesthetic


??

 

[Savage Idealist]

You know, I was actually thinking about this recently.

First, let me start of by saying that multiple intelligences can apply differently to people of all types; everyone is different: there can be those who are N and have high kinesthetic IQ's and there can be those who are I and have high social skill IQ's. Therefore, in realtion to cognitive function, I'll list which types realtes most probably to each different intelligence.

Kinesthetic - Se
Intrapersonal - Fi
Interpersonal - Fe
Logical Mathematical - Te or Ti
Spatial - Ni/Se or Ne
Musical - Se
Linguistic - Si
Natural - Fe

Some of these may be wrong since I'm no expert on this matter.

 

[Elfboy]

You know, I was actually thinking about this recently.

First, let me start of by saying that multiple intelligences can apply differently to people of all types; everyone is different: there can be those who are N and have high kinesthetic IQ's and there can be those who are I and have high social skill IQ's. Therefore, in realtion to cognitive function, I'll list which types realtes most probably to each different intelligence.

Kinesthetic - Se
Intrapersonal - Fi
Interpersonal - Fe
Logical Mathematical - Te or Ti
Spatial - Ni/Se or Ne
Musical - Se
Linguistic - Si
Natural - Fe

Some of these may be wrong since I'm no expert on this matter.

disagree on most of them
Kinesthetic: Se
Intrapersonal: Fi, Ne, Ni
Interpersonal: Fe, Ne
Logical/Mathmatical: Ti, Ne, Ni, Te
Spatial: Ne, Ni, Se
Musical: Fi, Fe, Ne, Se, Si,
Linguistic: Ne, Fi, Si, Ni
Natural: Fi
given the Ne and Fi prevailence, ENFPs and INFPs must be pretty smart

 

[liYA]

Thank you!

 

[Savage Idealist]

Sure thing.

 

[Randomnity]

I had no idea what the first ones were so I googled them. Surprisingly, it does fit for me (I guess I'm always a skeptic).

from http://www.floatingneutrinos.com/Message/arcs/links_on_abstractrandom.htm:

Ordered-seqential prefers:

Order and quiet
Exact directions
Guided Practice
Know the accepted way of doing something
Can apply ideas in a practical, hands-on way
Are given approval for specific work done

It's not very different from the NT one, which also applies to me. I'd prefer both lists to happen at once (or at different times, when they conflict). Actually of the 4 categories, the only one I don't identify with is abstract-random (NF), which makes sense since NF is definitely the least likely type for me.

Lecture and reading
Follow traditional procedures
Work alone
Research
Logical explanations
Are respected for intellectual ability
--------------

Anyway getting to your question:

Your list is different intelligence types, not learning styles. With that in mind, I would imagine that the intelligence types would be commonly used by:

Kinesthetic - Se
Intrapersonal - Fi
Interpersonal - Fe
Logical Mathematical - Ti, especially when supported by Ne
Spatial - Se, Ti
Musical - Could be Si, Ni, Ti, Fi, Te/Ne/Se, anything really depending on the approach....maybe more likely the introverted functions
Linguistic - Ne? Ti? Ni? Si? I don't really know for this one
Naturalist - Si, Se?

edit: I think calling them "intelligence" is silly, though. More like "ways of thinking"

 

[animenagai]

learning styles

abstract random is NF
abstract sequential NT
concrete random SF
concrete sequential ST

I've thought about this before when it was brought up in another forum. Honestly, I would put concrete random as SP and concrete sequential as SJ. Reading their descriptions, I could definitely see how they would correlate to each other eg. concrete random taking risks.

what about...

naturalistic
intrapersonal- fi?
interpersonal
linguistic
visual-spatial
logical mathematical
bodily kinesthetic

??

TBH, I never liked that 'system'. It has no scientific backing, and I don't even see how some of those can even be considered intelligence. WTF is natural intelligence?