Type: Try Me...

[You]

So what annoys you, ma'am.

 

[KDude]

You should step it up and keep it real if you're Fi then.

 

[skylights]

deja vu have you read that Upset ENFP thread in the NF forum?

there was this point at which a lot of ENFPs reached a consensus that we all have this weird thing where we know how we feel about something (how we assess it subjectively), but we need to get it out - to talk about it or at least write about it - to know what we think of it (how we assess it objectively). IRL this comes off as needing to talk your way through things and apply logic to those voiced thoughts before you can reach a conclusion.

does this resonate with you?

 

[skylights]

ps what is up with Fi and authenticity?

i mean let's face it, when can you really be anyone but yourself? it's a logical fallacy

 

[Vamp]

So what annoys you, ma'am.

Can't put my finger on it. You do try too hard and one liners don't help you any. Maybe you're enfj?

 

[Chloe]

You see no depth because you don't realize im playing.

I do. But that's not what annoys me.

I dont know I must admit I didnt read through Deja Vu yet, so I am not sure of my impressions.. but from beginning he striked me as something that ENFPs are quite often: deep but playing*, just like he said. vibe of feeling misunderstood too.

*not completely for real, more joking.

 

[You]

deja vu have you read that Upset ENFP thread in the NF forum?

there was this point at which a lot of ENFPs reached a consensus that we all have this weird thing where we know how we feel about something (how we assess it subjectively), but we need to get it out - to talk about it or at least write about it - to know what we think of it (how we assess it objectively). IRL this comes off as needing to talk your way through things and apply logic to those voiced thoughts before you can reach a conclusion.

does this resonate with you?

Is this distinctly different than ENTPs? I see this resonating with them under certain circumstances aswell.

 

[Chloe]

ps what is up with Fi and authenticity?

i mean let's face it, when can you really be anyone but yourself? it's a logical fallacy

i heard some fi's including myself that are obsessed with acting according to your true feelings. you cant be anything but yourself but you can act fake.

and point is: some Fi's will be more bothered by their own lack of genuineness...

 

[Vamp]

ps what is up with Fi and authenticity?

i mean let's face it, when can you really be anyone but yourself? it's a logical fallacy

I think the idea of "being yourself" is more complex than that. Fi gets brought up because many people do not do what they really want to do or what their first instincts (internal feelings) tell them to. Most people end up doing what external feelings of others tell them to.

 

[Jaguar]

I'm not picking up anything on my prickometer.

 

[You]

Check again, motha fucka.

 

[Jaguar]

Nah, that's not really a prick. Nice try.

 

[You]

Prickness can't be forced. It's gotta be "genuine".

 

[Jaguar]

No sale. Lol.

 

[You]

Tag says otherwise.

 

[KDude]

Urban Dictionary: try-hard

 

[You]

I try as hard as that guy in the avatar does.

 

[Vamp]

Nah, that's not really a prick. Nice try.

Urban Dictionary: try-hard

I knew I wasn't the only person that saw it!

Can't some enfps try too hard on their quest to let everyone know they are the quirkiest, most entertaining and all that? And some fail miserably. . ..

 

[You]

And some make judgements knowing that isn't their strong point.

KDude doesn't even know his own type.

Jaguar is cool.

 

[KDude]

I do know my own type. I'm just trying hard not to be a prick about it