• You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to additional post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), view blogs, respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please join our community today! Just click here to register. You should turn your Ad Blocker off for this site or certain features may not work properly. If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us by clicking here.

Help me figure out how I use my functions?

redacted

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 28, 2007
Messages
4,223
Think of extroversion as breadth and introversion as depth. There are four functions (Sensing, Intuition, Thinking, Feeling), and each has some preference on the breadth vs. depth spectrum.

For example, when I use Thinking, I heavily favor depth, missing out on all sorts of environmental detail on the way. If I preferred extroversion of Thinking more, I'd pay more attention to each environmental detail at the cost of analyzing a few in depth. Te people think, "why make a conclusion if you're missing something?". Ti people think, "why distract myself with input when I still have a conclusion to make?".

Fe would be "how can I know if something's right without factoring in everything in the situation?".
Fi would be "what do the details of this moment really have to do with what's RIGHT?".

Etc.
 

psyche

New member
Joined
Aug 2, 2009
Messages
86
Think of extroversion as breadth and introversion as depth. There are four functions (Sensing, Intuition, Thinking, Feeling), and each has some preference on the breadth vs. depth spectrum.

For example, when I use Thinking, I heavily favor depth, missing out on all sorts of environmental detail on the way. If I preferred extroversion of Thinking more, I'd pay more attention to each environmental detail at the cost of analyzing a few in depth. Te people think, "why make a conclusion if you're missing something?". Ti people think, "why distract myself with input when I still have a conclusion to make?".

Fe would be "how can I know if something's right without factoring in everything in the situation?".
Fi would be "what do the details of this moment really have to do with what's RIGHT?".

Etc.

Interesting...By your definition of Ti/Te, I'm Ti. I miss environmental details all the time. But I just assumed that's because I'm an iNtuiter. My bf is a Sensor and he notices environmental details, like for instance if we go to someone's house he'll notice the fact that there's a picture on the wall, that I never, ever notice. I'm too busy thinking about the feeling of the environment, wondering what the host's life is like, thinking about how I'd like to decorate my own home, etc.

I don't feel like I have to think through something in great depth to reach a conclusion, in that I won't do all sorts of research or spend hours mulling over an idea, but I do feel it's absolutely necessary that I figured out and name the key issue I'm pondering. So, if I'm thinking about a problem, whether it's my own or someone else's, I won't stop until I've "nailed" it.

Does this make sense?
 
Top