Not even going to bother.
User Tag List
View Poll Results: How do you rate this book?
- Voters
- 11. You may not vote on this poll
Thread: Psychological Types
-
07-21-2020, 10:43 AM #11B L A Z I N G . S E R E N I T Y
馃櫉 饾敡饾敩饾敟饾敒饾敮饾敠 | 饾敨饾敩饾敟饾敒饾敮饾敠 馃櫇
QUESTION EVERYTHING
-路- 路- -路路 --- - 路-
-
11-11-2020, 09:11 PM #12
Literally blew my mind.
tiny purple fishes run laughing through your fingers
and you want to take her with you, to the hard land of the winter
-
11-15-2020, 06:18 AM #13
It has a strange structure.
It's like two books, the first book doesn't quite develop the theory explicitly but inside interpretations of religious, literary, philosophical and historical texts, and presents the theory as he probably developed it and his sources, and the second book develops the theory without any references, more like an outline.She was not often invited to join in the conversation of the others, nor did she desire it. Her own thoughts and reflections were habitually her best companions. -- Mansfield Park, Jane Austen.
We have all a better guide in ourselves, if we would attend to it, than any other person can be. -- Mansfield Park, Jane Austen.Forever_Jung liked this post
Similar Threads
-
Psychological Types + Neurosis
By astrotheologian in forum Myers-Briggs and Jungian Cognitive FunctionsReplies: 0Last Post: 08-23-2017, 09:48 AM -
[JCF] An explanation of why academia hasn't accepted, or even tested, Psychological Types
By funtensity in forum Myers-Briggs and Jungian Cognitive FunctionsReplies: 17Last Post: 03-25-2014, 03:55 PM -
Review of new book: 'The Question of Psychological Types'
By Economica in forum Myers-Briggs and Jungian Cognitive FunctionsReplies: 0Last Post: 01-28-2013, 05:14 PM -
INTJ & INTP & Psychological Types
By Jack Flak in forum Myers-Briggs and Jungian Cognitive FunctionsReplies: 21Last Post: 07-31-2012, 09:56 AM -
A Critic of Psychological Types (not the functions).
By Little_Sticks in forum Myers-Briggs and Jungian Cognitive FunctionsReplies: 7Last Post: 08-20-2010, 03:37 AM