it is interesting to note this. Science are broad subjects. It can be natural science: biology, chemistry, physiscs, social science: geography, history, economics. Math also a broad subjects, it can be a set theory, algebra, arithmetics, geometry, statistics, etcs. Judging ourselves to be bad or good at some may not have sufficient supporting data, since we may not be able to include all topics;nor finding any "experts" who are recognizably authoritative in conducting testing for each. Not to mention that the tester must also be able to correctly identify their tested subject as INTP; not mistype them.
But I do think that INTP if gets balanced, should have some aptitude in biology, since as sensing introverted-extroverted feeler gets "awake" from its unsconsciousness, they should be able to memorize the latin name of species, nomenclature, etc
From an INTP in natural sciences (chemistry): I'm the worst at memorizing. Unless I find any patterns or why that name is used, I mostly try to logically deduce at the moment anything that should be memorized.
Speaking from experience, since I don't have any data at hand:
INTPs in biology aren't that many. Also, biology is the "softest" of the STEM subjects. It still is a system to understand, but a system that needs to be approached more with memory than pure reasoning. In chemistry, there ironically are more TJs, SFJs and ENTPs, INTPs are very few. In biology, in my experience, SPs are overrepresented, followed by FJs and FPs. In physics, NTPs, TJs and SFJs, very few SPs compared to biology.
Ironically, I've found out that there are a lot of INTPs in humanistic subjects, mostly in languages that are usually thought to be "weird" or hard: those are new systems to understand.
INTPs like systems and understanding them, may it be a science or not. At this level, it all comes to individual differences in what you perceive as such. For example, OP mentioned history. I was the worst at it because to me it meant memorizing dates and such, but, like everything, it can be approached from a more logical standpoint, so trying to understand the underlying causes that link the events.
---
I used to have a fluctuating relationship with maths. At first in high school I was decent, not good. I liked it, but I didn't get the results I wanted compared to other subjects. Then calculus came in and things changed, I discovered I was really good at it.