User Tag List

First 39474849505159 Last

Results 481 to 490 of 681

  1. #481
    Permabanned
    Join Date
    May 2009
    MBTI
    ISFP
    Enneagram
    6w7 sx
    Socionics
    SEE Fi
    Posts
    25,293

    Default

    But I am looking at it objectively. I don't even like handbags, so I'm not projecting myself onto the situation at all. If I had $20, 000 to spend it's highly likely that I would buy a safe, hybrid-powered vehicle rather than any item of clothing.

    I just think you're rationalizing the cars because you like them. I think the subjectivity is the other way around.

  2. #482
    Happy Dancer uumlau's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    MBTI
    INTJ
    Enneagram
    953 sp/so
    Posts
    5,708

    Default

    Well, an INTJ would pay $20k for a handbag if it worked like a TARDIS ... you know, much larger inside than the outside. Heck, if it could take me back in time to get to work at 8 AM when I wake up at 10 AM, that'd be real sweet, too.
    An argument is two people sharing their ignorance.

    A discussion is two people sharing their understanding, even when they disagree.

  3. #483
    Its time. Cassandra's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    14,767

    Default

    I think this is a matter of context. That handbag would be way more useful to me than a pretty car ever could be as I live in the middle of town, have no parking space, don't have a drivers license and am female and therefore in need of a handbag every day. And yes, it does help me to be in a good mood to have something I genuinly like with me every damned day.

    So when I decide to spend my money, the handbag will be way more worth it than a car ever could be. When a beau decides to buy me a gift, he'd better well get the handbag if he wants me to be happy and for that to translate into my mood to him. Just saying

    And I'd imagine this probably works the same for a female INTJ...or am I wrong, ladies?

    at Uumlau

  4. #484
    Let Go Of Your Team Zarathustra's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    8,154

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Satine View Post
    I think this is a matter of context.
    Yes, it is a matter of context.

    That context happens to be the utility functions of each of the hypothetical purchasers.
    The Justice Fighter

    INTJ - 6w5 8dw 3w4 sx/so - Neutral Good

    "I trust what you are doing though…I just see it a little differently.
    I don’t see it as you stepping away from the fire. I see it as the fire directing your course.
    No matter how airy or earthy or watery you become... to many of us you will always be...a super nova."

    "Behind these gates of seeming warmth sits, loosely chained, a fierce attack dog. Perhaps not crazy, but dangerous"

    The Aggressive 6
    Debator


  5. #485
    Protocol Droid Athenian200's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    MBTI
    INFJ
    Enneagram
    4w5
    Posts
    8,828

    Default

    I thought that Zarathustra was condemning anyone who spent more than their means.

    Basically, if someone bought a car that they couldn't really afford on their budget, that was also bad. I thought that he was defending the right of people with disposable income to waste their money on whatever they like (including handbags), but saying that it was foolish to waste money on fancy things when you have a tight budget.

    If that's what he was arguing, it makes sense. However, if he was in fact arguing that people should buy expensive cars that they want but can't really afford, then that's illogical, especially if he's applying the opposite principle to handbags.

    I really can't understand the kind of language he's using here, though... that Wikipedia page is too confusing, complete with math problems, so I'm not going to assume I had any clue what he meant.

  6. #486
    Its time. Cassandra's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    14,767

    Default

    Ok, that link is scary..are they seriously quantifying and 'mathefying' desire, happiness and well...feelings?

    That's just backwards, imho.

  7. #487
    Let Go Of Your Team Zarathustra's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    8,154

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Satine View Post
    Ok, that link is scary..are they seriously quantifying and 'mathefying' desire, happiness and well...feelings?

    That's just backwards, imho.
    That's the basis of practically the entire field of economics.

    It's all founded on the philosophy of utilitarianism propounded by John Stuart Mill, Jeremy Bentham, et al.

    Trust me, I had my qualms with it as well, and it's not perfect.

    But if you take it with a grain of salt, and actually study it, it makes a pretty good (albeit, not perfect) amount of sense.

    And as you start getting into a more advanced understanding of it, it actually starts to make a lot more sense.

    It's basically the study of how people make decisions to maximize their happiness.

    And, moreover, how they do so in light of budgetary constraints.

    As you might imagine, such a field of study would be highly relevant to the discussion we've been having.

    It also happens to be one of my fields of study at university, so I'm rather well versed in it.
    The Justice Fighter

    INTJ - 6w5 8dw 3w4 sx/so - Neutral Good

    "I trust what you are doing though…I just see it a little differently.
    I don’t see it as you stepping away from the fire. I see it as the fire directing your course.
    No matter how airy or earthy or watery you become... to many of us you will always be...a super nova."

    "Behind these gates of seeming warmth sits, loosely chained, a fierce attack dog. Perhaps not crazy, but dangerous"

    The Aggressive 6
    Debator


  8. #488
    Happy Dancer uumlau's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    MBTI
    INTJ
    Enneagram
    953 sp/so
    Posts
    5,708

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Satine View Post
    Ok, that link is scary..are they seriously quantifying and 'mathefying' desire, happiness and well...feelings?

    That's just backwards, imho.
    Typologically speaking, it's where T and F meet.

    Both T and F understand "money." T likes that it can be objectively quantified. F likes that it measures "value."

    As Z notes, it isn't perfect, but it's about as good a translation between T and F that can be managed.
    An argument is two people sharing their ignorance.

    A discussion is two people sharing their understanding, even when they disagree.

  9. #489
    Its time. Cassandra's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    14,767

    Default

    I dunno, Z.

    At the risk of inflicting your wrath (and granted, I don't know anything about this field), this sounds like an ass-backwards way for emotionally incompetent people to make decisions about, ironically, a field they clearly don't know what to do with (aka F). Though I'd imagine it would have its uses in todays society..there's no doubt about that. It just smells like a shortcut. A corrupted one, at that.

    @ Uumlau: There are other ways to bridge that gap and keep the intrinsic value F provides. This just sounds like strip-mining to me. Understanding is very much wanted and translation is needed, but there's better translations out there, i'd say.

  10. #490
    Let Go Of Your Team Zarathustra's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    8,154

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Athenian200 View Post
    I thought that Zarathustra was condemning anyone who spent more than their means.

    Basically, if someone bought a car that they couldn't really afford on their budget, that was also bad. I thought that he was defending the right of people with disposable income to waste their money on whatever they like (including handbags), but saying that it was foolish to waste money on fancy things when you have a tight budget.

    If that's what he was arguing, it makes sense. However, if he was in fact arguing that people should buy expensive cars that they want but can't really afford, then that's illogical, especially if he's applying the opposite principle to handbags.

    I really can't understand the kind of language he's using here, though... that Wikipedia page is too confusing, complete with math problems, so I'm not going to assume I had any clue what he meant.
    The first two sentences were exactly what I meant.

    The Justice Fighter

    INTJ - 6w5 8dw 3w4 sx/so - Neutral Good

    "I trust what you are doing though…I just see it a little differently.
    I don’t see it as you stepping away from the fire. I see it as the fire directing your course.
    No matter how airy or earthy or watery you become... to many of us you will always be...a super nova."

    "Behind these gates of seeming warmth sits, loosely chained, a fierce attack dog. Perhaps not crazy, but dangerous"

    The Aggressive 6
    Debator


Similar Threads

  1. Losing/Breaking possessions and inferior Se
    By greenfairy in forum Myers-Briggs and Jungian Cognitive Functions
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 02-24-2014, 04:46 PM
  2. [NT] NT's and Taste in Comedy
    By Didums in forum The NT Rationale (ENTP, INTP, ENTJ, INTJ)
    Replies: 65
    Last Post: 03-09-2011, 02:25 AM
  3. [INFJ] INFJs and bad taste in music.
    By MonkeyGrass in forum The NF Idyllic (ENFP, INFP, ENFJ, INFJ)
    Replies: 61
    Last Post: 01-07-2010, 02:56 AM
  4. [INTJ] INTJ, Responsibility, Duty and Competency
    By InvisibleJim in forum The NT Rationale (ENTP, INTP, ENTJ, INTJ)
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 12-05-2009, 01:20 PM
  5. [Se] Squashing upstart inferior-Se?
    By Skyward in forum The NF Idyllic (ENFP, INFP, ENFJ, INFJ)
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-28-2009, 08:09 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO