[INTP] intp making simple things complex

[INTP]

Well I can give you a logical reason to change your username to (Almost) INTP.

okay

 

[yvonne]

^ what do you mean by that?

 

[INTP]

Yeah, I don't see the problem with people not wanting an X in their type. There's definitely INXPs out there. I know that messes up function order.

wouldnt INXPs order be ti, fi, ne.. or fi, ti, ne.. instead ti, ne, fi..?

 

[ajblaise]

wouldnt INXPs order be ti, fi, ne.. or fi, ti, ne.. instead ti, ne, fi..?

It could be either.

Even two strong INTPs can have different function order and use.

 

[INTP]

It could be either.

Even two strong INTPs can have different function order and use.

imo type comes from two strongest functions and other functions order can vary between individuals without changing the type

 

[yvonne]

oh, ok... so that's what you meant. i haven't really gotten that into this yet. if you have time, would you mind explaining how the x influences functioning, then?

 

[entropie]

oh, ok... so that's what you meant. i haven't really gotten that into this yet. if you have time, would you mind explaining how the x influences functioning, then?

Dont do it, dont learn that, you'll be caught in this wave of thought forever and its wake will last decades and thats only because its exhilerating to think about, yet total bullshit

 

[ajblaise]

imo type comes from two strongest functions and other functions order can vary between individuals without changing the type

INTPs don't say "imo". We don't need qualifiers to our knowledge.

oh, ok... so that's what you meant. i haven't really gotten that into this yet. if you have time, would you mind explaining how the x influences functioning, then?

It should be different for every x person.

Here, you should take the functions test:
http://www.cognitiveprocesses.com/assessment/develop_old.html

 

[Salomé]

my developed Fi is caused by developing it by smoking weed

Is this how you develop your arguments too?
If so, it explains much.

 

[INTP]

INTPs don't say "imo". We don't need qualifiers to our knowledge.

even when we arent sure about things?

Is this how you develop your arguments too?

yes

 

[ajblaise]

even when we arent sure about things?

Especially not then.

 

[INTP]

Especially not then.

im about 95% sure that i have readed that somewhere, this percentage is high enough for me to form some kind of personal opinion about it, but since the percentage isnt 100% i cant say that i know that it is the truth. i dont care enough to search for that to varify this info, neither do i care much if a stranger finds out that my opinion was wrong(would be different if it was someone i know), but i dont want to tell something as an truth if im not 100% sure about it.

are you sure that intp cant use word imo in this kind of situation?

 

[ajblaise]

but i dont want to tell something as an truth if im not 100% sure about it.

Guilt! What kind of F emotion is that?!

are you sure that intp cant use word imo in this kind of situation?

I'll quote the late Morgan Le Fay on this one:

Most INTPs would understand that I'm playin' wid ya.

That's why.

I'll give you the benefit of the doubt for being Finnish.

 

[INTP]

I'll quote the late Morgan Le Fay on this one:

you are not intp either!

 

[ajblaise]

you are not intp either!

Well you're the one who has to change their username now.

 

[INTP]

Well you're the one who has to change their username now.

but you need to change type under you avatar

 

[ajblaise]

but you need to change type under you avatar

What am I? An INFP like you?

 

[JocktheMotie]

INTPs don't seek to bring complexity out of simplicity, but are inclined to seek complexity to bring it into order. Like Blue says, Ti is reductionist to a fault. That being said, we can get a bit verbose. How can one appreciate simplicity and precision if not aware of the complexity and chaos?

 

[ajblaise]

INTPs don't seek to bring complexity out of simplicity, but are inclined to seek complexity to bring it into order. Like Blue says, Ti is reductionist to a fault. That being said, we can get a bit verbose. How can one appreciate simplicity and precision if not aware of the complexity and chaos?

I think it's because we can extract much out of and abstractify seemingly ordinary things. But it all usually comes back to simplification.

 

[INTP]

What am I? An INFP like you?

dunno, but intp would have noticed that i started playing with you by continuing acting as if i didnt realize that you were playing with me.

let me think.. you interact with other people -> E. you focus more on what you see than what could be -> S. you used logic on what you see -> T. you started judging my type -> j. So i guess your an istj