• You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to additional post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), view blogs, respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please join our community today! Just click here to register. You should turn your Ad Blocker off for this site or certain features may not work properly. If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us by clicking here.

[NT] Theory vs application, overcoming analysis paralysis?

ObliviousExistence

New member
Joined
Sep 19, 2009
Messages
178
MBTI Type
loco
Enneagram
5W4
for those who don't know what it is Analysis paralysis - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia .

I assume this is common among INTX types, the fear of not knowing enough, the fear of not being prepared enough and the need for extended analysis which usually leads in totally loosing sense of practicality\simplicity and sometimes an irrational mental block to dealing with new unfamiliar situations where it would perhaps have been quicker or better to have gone in head first and "learned" or "corrected" ones approach through a series of errors and lessons learned through correcting those errors.

How do you deal with this fear of not knowing enough, or the need to approach everything from a body of accumulated knowledge or in a systematical way?

I think a better title would have been, learning though aquiring theoretical understanding vs learning through immersion and trial and error.
 

ygolo

My termites win
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
5,996
I see this more as problem of people with Type 5 enneagram.

If your "analysis" is mainly being driven by fear of being overwhelmed, you may actually not be analyzing anything.

The way to get out of this is to observe, experiment, and engaging in fruitful analysis.

What is the difference between fruitful analysis and the type that leads to paralysis?

Well, I would say the biggest indicator is if you are having fun doing the analysis or not. If worry is driving your analysis, you need to force yourself to make observations and experiments, in this case.

Another rule of thumb, is to model the situation using the simplest model that could work, and then double check that the insights do not change with a one level deeper model. After that it is time to apply and test your understanding in controlled ways. This process is simultaneously prudent and gives the analysis some purpose.

The hard part is actually realizing that you are paralyzed and driven by worry.
 

Misty_Mountain_Rose

New member
Joined
Jul 21, 2008
Messages
1,123
MBTI Type
INTJ
Enneagram
4w5
Enneagram types may have something to do with it... I'm a 4 and I find myself getting 'sick and tired' of the mental loops that I get into and so I'll break out of it with a dramatic (and sometimes badly timed) decision to do something about it.

I have heard over and over in my head though 'If you don't know what to do next, wait until it happens'... which I suppose leads to its own kind of gridlock. A lot of things seem to work themselves out though without direct interaction. In this, I'm mainly speaking of 'people interactions' though and not say, planning a project. When it comes to actually creating something, I'm pretty good at planning and implementing.
 
Top