[ENTJ] ENTJ's - What are your pet peeves?

[ThatGirl]

People who act as mediators in conflicts. Either let me handle it or STFU, because you are annoying and not necessary.


Emo-ness

Lack of self discipline.

Lack of accountability.

 

[FDG]

You sound like an ass.

 

[ThatGirl]

But when you rant in public isn't there always the damn token feeler that tries to "help" you because you are so "mad?"

lol

 

[bLAze]

People who act as mediators in conflicts. Either let me handle it or STFU, because you are annoying and not necessary.

What is worse is when some outsider tries to mediate what they perceive to be a conflict, but what is in actuality only a debate or simply a conversation with another (usually NT) person. NF's are most guilty of this. Some just do not understand that disagreement does not equal dislike.

I second the motion for these people to STFU!

 

[Jaguar]

You sound like an ass.

Which one? I've lost count.

 

[bLAze]

Which one? I've lost count.

What exactly are you attempting to count? That might explain your dilemma.

 

[Bay]

entjs sexy azzes boobs anal

 

[DiscoBiscuit]

entjs sexy azzes boobs anal

lol

 

[simulatedworld]

in my experience ENTJs are pretty irritated by ENTPs in general, and vice versa

 

[DiscoBiscuit]

To one everything's a joke

To the other everything is super serial

 

[simulatedworld]

hmm nice way of putting it

 

[sgtmac_46]

To one everything's a joke

To the other everything is super serial

Which to the ENTP makes it even funnier!

 

[simulatedworld]

Most of the time. It gets a little ridiculous when you've pissed them off to the point that Ni takes a vacation and you're just dealing with Te+Se. That can get pretty exhausting pretty quickly.

 

[DiscoBiscuit]

Make clear that the ENTJ knows this is a joking situation before joking with one.

 

[JustHer]

in my experience ENTJs are pretty irritated by ENTPs in general, and vice versa

Really?

I've never met one but I would imagine I would totally love them.

 

[simulatedworld]

Really?

I've never met one but I would imagine I would totally love them.

Imagine again. Here's how most of the arguments (and both types are all about arguing) seem to go:

ENTP: I have observed an external pattern or phenomenon across contextual lines (Ne), which leads me to believe that these governing principles will explain and categorize it (Ti.)

ENTJ: No such pattern exists because there is no empirically verifiable evidence for it (Te), and expecting reality to behave according to any single internally consistent rule system is the ridiculous in the first place (Ni.)

*commense explosive argument*

 

[sgtmac_46]

Imagine again. Here's how most of the arguments (and both types are all about arguing) seem to go:

ENTP: I have observed an external pattern or phenomenon across contextual lines (Ne), which leads me to believe that these governing principles will explain and categorize it (Ti.)

ENTJ: No such pattern exists because there is no empirically verifiable evidence for it (Te), and expecting reality to behave according to any single internally consistent rule system is the ridiculous in the first place (Ni.)

*commense explosive argument*

Hit that nail on the head!

 

[JustHer]

Imagine again. Here's how most of the arguments (and both types are all about arguing) seem to go:

ENTP: I have observed an external pattern or phenomenon across contextual lines (Ne), which leads me to believe that these governing principles will explain and categorize it (Ti.)

ENTJ: No such pattern exists because there is no empirically verifiable evidence for it (Te), and expecting reality to behave according to any single internally consistent rule system is the ridiculous in the first place (Ni.)

*commense explosive argument*

Maybe in argument, but I've found Ne and Ti (seperately, as I've seen them) to be pretty fascinating. I'd probably find that kind of conversation pretty worthwhile even if I didn't agree.

 

[sgtmac_46]

Maybe in argument, but I've found Ne and Ti (seperately, as I've seen them) to be pretty fascinating. I'd probably find that kind of conversation pretty worthwhile even if I didn't agree.

They're always fascinating........even if the result is a decades long intellectual feud.

 

[simulatedworld]

Maybe in argument, but I've found Ne and Ti (seperately, as I've seen them) to be pretty fascinating. I'd probably find that kind of conversation pretty worthwhile even if I didn't agree.

You should teach that attitude to some of the ENTJ posters on this board. :hi: