Matthew_Z
That chalkboard guy
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2009
- Messages
- 1,256
- MBTI Type
- xxxx
Adjectives, yes, articles, no. None at all.
That would explain a lot.
Adjectives, yes, articles, no. None at all.
Adjectives, yes, articles, no. None at all.
Use those smarts of yours and evaluate more of everything.
Yeah, that was my frustration for people confusing all kinds of personal preferences (like the preference of liking the smell of rose) with some kind of "intelligence". I just appreciate the kind of intelligence that is known to be associated with good measurable, objective performance in something.
I'm feeling for a writer who wrote an article with ironic opinions in here a while ago. She was condemned, her opinions denounced. No clue she was writing in another style than realism - no clue of that sort from anyone in the ISTJ land. In the ISTJ land, everything is literal. All other kind of expression is cheating and terrible.
I'm beginning to wonder if the ISTJ land is world wide.
I find the ideas of most everyone substandard, even if expressed in standard language.
I haven't been trying to impress anyone with anything like that too hard.. not that it'd be a criminal offense trying to impress someone But no, the style hasn't been anything I've wanted to impress people with. If you'd want to condemn all the people who don't stay stuff just as they are, you'd have to condemn a hell lot of people. Perhaps you'd like to continue condemning the people who do say the stuff as they are, as a continuation to your crusade.Don't give me anymore of your pseudo-literary drivel.
I'm the last person on earth you want to try and impress with that crap.
I have a degree in English Lit.
Not only do I know literary devices, I can easily recognize someone pretending to know them.
That's you.
This is a typology forum. Period.
This is not a Literature or Creative Writing forum.
As if whining about your "high IQ" isn't enough,
now you're whining because people don't realize you're the ghost of Ernest-fucking-Hemingway.
You have no right to denounce people simply because they don't appreciate your "writing style."
You've approached some messages I've wrote from a weird angle, something I've tried to clarify when I've got the time. I couldn't bend my mind to the idea that you wouldn't understand some things, so I left them unexplained.
Perhaps you're mad for getting another player in the disapproval business?
I recommend to chill off, examine things and reply some time after.
My problem is really not the deficient language I write in, but my expectation for others to distinguish sarcasm, irony and realism. I'm sure that understanding all of that goes beyond petty distinctions in grammar.
Time for my MENSA meeting. Gotta' go!
Oh boy, there comes a morning after a night of drinking, and it's now. If I felt misunderstood then, I should have just made myself understood, and that's it.
I would've missed the advice that I need to improve my language, tho.
115-130 is the above above average range on most test, you seem to suggest that you are obove that which I highly doubt considering that
A) you probably took an online test, everyone who takes online tests is a "genius"
B) Its statisticly unlikely considering that IQ tests have a bell curve.
C) IQ isnt a very good measure of intelligence in the first place.
D) lol troll
I rest my case
-intelligence outside IQ isn't well established, so IQ test intelligence is in fact the best