If I were to make one criticism about INTPc as a whole is the whole conformation problem. I never really did find that large a group of people who's minds were so similar to mine. Instead I found a group of people who in part HAD to be INTP or would throw themselves off buildings or better yet shoot anyone who's more INTP than they so that they may persist in their point of view of being the most INTP of the lots. Matched with this there seems to be an underlying culture of getting those people together who get along and then label them all with the same type. Realistically I found little insight from a group whom I was hoping would be so awash with fresh insight and discourse as to be a sheer overload. Perhaps my naivety set me up for a disappointment, perhaps I expect too much corrollory from type alone? What I do know is that thinking differently is not supported as INTPs tend to do when relaxed, instead I've found more crossfire and flaming than I'd expect from a whole room full of negative feedback INTJs!
In summation I found INTPc totally non supportive of INTPs and instead more destructive than anything.
I know I've long been someone who's against INTPc but I've yet to see a reason to go back so perhaps my perceptions are out of date.
Perhaps it is a question sometimes of what we need and are seeking from each site, how we are different at each time and place we are in as well.
I've been on both and I prefer INTPc. The destruction was the opposite direction for me vs. Xander. But that is a factor of who I am and what I need.
Jennifer once told me I would be "too soft" for INTPc. But I seem to work out there better. If I had to draw an analogy, MBTIc is like real life, all types, so definitely it'd be easier to find a space to belong to - by definition, it is a space for all
N types?
Or as I was telling MacG, another more cynical way of saying it is simply, it is easier to find a clique to belong to here. *sic*
But like RL, you end up having to sieve through a lot more noise to find some meaningful sounds, and to make some of your own too, in a way. It is fun if you're up for it, for sure. That is one way connections can be made.
But if I'm seeking quiet people, I find in INTPc a comfort because there is little need to explain what I mean. The mind is more free, in a way. They may disagree, but you get how the mind works. There is less of the meta-explaining of what I mean, making sure others get the gist and do not see it as insults etc. The site has its own unique brand of flaws, but this isn't the place to go into it.
Regardless, it is different strokes for different folks. I see no reason to have to force a divide/competition/choice. People will move between places, IRL, online, as they grow and outgrow each thing.
I've met good people on both. I think on both I've been welcome.
As long as the sites meet the members' needs, and people are around in one form or other, isn't that what matters.
Perhaps our own acceptance / rejection, and insistence on seeing each site as bad/good, is merely our own limitations on adaptability. In that, it is easier to adapt in a space for all types than for one type, I guess?