Care to share the original formal problem? There are errors in solution manuals (generally speaking).
So far, I have agreed with your solution for x, and it is clear that you can't take a number bigger than one to a positive power and get a number less than 1.
The following would make sense to me:
x + x(1+0.13/2)^1.5 =
x + x(1.065)^1.5 =
x + x(.9098621) = 1.909862x
So would this:
x(1+0.13/2)^1.5 =
x(1.065)^1.5 =
approx. x(1.09) = 1.09x
User Tag List
Thread: Random basic math question

10232007, 03:24 PM #11
Accept the past. Live for the present. Look forward to the future.
Robot Fusion
"As our island of knowledge grows, so does the shore of our ignorance." John Wheeler
"[A] scientist looking at nonscientific problems is just as dumb as the next guy." Richard Feynman
"[P]etabytes of [] data is not the same thing as understanding emergent mechanisms and structures." Jim Crutchfield

10232007, 03:26 PM #12

10232007, 04:48 PM #13
1.065^1.5 = .909862128
It appears the answer sheet left out a sign.My wife and I made a game to teach kids about nutrition. Please try our game and vote for us to win. (Voting period: July 14  August 14)
http://www.revoltingvegetables.com

10232007, 04:53 PM #14

10262007, 06:26 PM #15
I ended up being wrong (which in hindsight was obvious, of course). Ah well.
For all those that wanted to know the problem.... Here it is (numbers have been changed )
Three old payments on a debt were arranged at $1800 due in 6 months paying 11.5% compounded quarterly, $1100 due in 12 months paying 12% compounded monthly and $500 due in 18 months paying 9.5% compounded semiannually. These are to be replaced by two equal payments due in 9 months and 18 months respecitvely. What is the size of these payments if money is worth 13% compounded semiannually? (Use 9 months from now as the focal date).

10292007, 04:25 PM #16
The present value of the first three payments are 1700.80, 976.19, and 435.02 respectively. Total present value is $3112.01.
You can then solve for the size of the two monthly payments with this equation:
3112.01 = x*(1 + .13/2)^1.5 + x*(1+.13/2)^3
If you multiply this expression by 1.065^1.5, then it is equivalent to
3420.31 = x + x(1.065)^1.5
Solving for x yields $1790.87 for each of the two payments. (This is assuming that I've made no mistakes which is always possible.)My wife and I made a game to teach kids about nutrition. Please try our game and vote for us to win. (Voting period: July 14  August 14)
http://www.revoltingvegetables.com

10292007, 04:58 PM #17

10292007, 06:08 PM #18
I don't quite follow your logic. Perhaps it comes from bringing the "contract to completion". Is the debt being refinanced at time zero or 9 months from now? I was working the problem as if the debt is being refinanced at time zero.
Also I don't understand this line:
FV=1800(1+0.115/4)^2= 1904.9878
This calculation assumes that the first payment is worth $1800 at time zero, and will be worth 1904.9878 at the time of payment.
On the other hand if you assume that the payment is worth $1800 six months from now, then the payment is worth 1800(1 + .115/4)^2 = 1700.80 at time zero.My wife and I made a game to teach kids about nutrition. Please try our game and vote for us to win. (Voting period: July 14  August 14)
http://www.revoltingvegetables.com

10292007, 06:33 PM #19
Probably bad wording on my behalf (well, my course anyway ), but it isn't a "strip bond" value of 1800, it's 1800 + interest (at 11.5%). 1700.80 is what you would pay to get exactly 1800 at 11.5%. It should read "A debt of 1800, due in 6 months, bearing an interest rate of 11.5%" (paying in the original problem refers to interest payments being made, but is not an annuity, thus compounded.)
In either case, the value wouldn't be 1700.80  the PV calc would have to work off the current value of money  in theory, one wouldn't pay 1700.80 if money was worth 13% (actual value of the FV 1700.80 in this situation is 1810.5). That is, someone could buy the exact same instrument at current rates to have 1810.50 rather than 1800 at 6 months. The 11.5% one would be discounted because of the change in interest rates.
(The question asks for the reference point being 9 months, but that's for the markers... should be the same answer either way, or extremely close.)

10292007, 10:27 PM #20
Hmm...I thought that if I had made a mistake then it would probably be in the terminology. All of the math is essentially the same regardless of context, but you have to know the exact meaning of the terms in order to work the problem. For example I am still not sure what it means to have money "worth 13%". I assumed it meant that the debts were refinanced at 13%.
Anyway now that I know what you mean with regard to the debt payments. I'd work the problem this way. First get the value of each of the first three payments at 9 months.
Payment 1 at 6 months is 1800(1 + .115/4)^2 = 1904.9878
Advancing this to 9 months yields 1904.9878(1.065)^.5 = 1965.9253
Payment 2 at 12 months is 1100(1 + .12/12)^12 = 1239.5075
Discounting back to 9 months yields 1239.5075(1.065)^.5 = 1201.0867
Payment 3 at 18 months is 500(1 + .095/2)^3 = 574.6880
Discounting back to 9 months yeilds 574.6880(1.065)^1.5 = 522.8868
Adding these three numbers yields a value of $3689.90 at 9 months. To find the value of the two payments to be made, solve this equation:
3689.90 = x + x(1.065)^1.5
solving yields x = $1932.02 per payment
(Again this assumes I understand all the terminology now, and haven't made any calculation errors.)My wife and I made a game to teach kids about nutrition. Please try our game and vote for us to win. (Voting period: July 14  August 14)
http://www.revoltingvegetables.com
Similar Threads

Math Question
By Mal12345 in forum Science, Technology, and Future TechReplies: 23Last Post: 06262014, 11:55 PM 
Math question  3d integrals
By onemoretime in forum Science, Technology, and Future TechReplies: 12Last Post: 09212010, 09:07 AM 
Random math question for you
By raz in forum Science, Technology, and Future TechReplies: 13Last Post: 09182009, 01:49 PM