What's your Socionics type?

[RedAmazoneFriendZone]

Every time I take the test or I get ENTJ (LIE) or I get ESE, ESFJ.

It seems I have a double personality. With ESFP I have a triangle/trio personality

 

[strychnine]

Every time I take the test or I get ENTJ (LIE) or I get ESE, ESFJ.

It seems I have a double personality. With ESFP I have a triangle/trio personality

LOL Those are superego types.

Can you link to this test please? I gotta see this. :

 

[RedAmazoneFriendZone]

LOL Those are superego types.

Can you link to this test please? I gotta see this. :

Go to "type comparison tool", you'll have fun

 

[strychnine]

Go to "type comparison tool", you'll have fun

Thanks. Btw your avatar is funny/disturbing

 

[RedAmazoneFriendZone]

Thanks. Btw your avatar is funny/disturbing

Yes it is a very powerful tool. As usual one should not fall into the trap of generalisation.

But, to make things simple, what is written about types is true even if one is not A TYPE but A SINGLE PERSON (that's good not to forget it once in a while )


See... I have a double personality : funny + disturbing

 

[Kheledon]

Every time I take the test or I get ENTJ (LIE) or I get ESE, ESFJ.

It seems I have a double personality. With ESFP I have a triangle/trio personality

To me, the most obvious conclusion regarding these results is that you are well-dualized, and that's a good thing. That said, over the course of my many years of self-typing using various MBTI-type tools, I have occasionally flipped on I/E. I have flipped on S/N (but only once, and only barely--I am primarily N). I have also flipped on the F/T axis. I have never flipped on the J axis, however, and that means, in Socionics terms, that I am fundamentally rational.

The various, online, MBTI typing tools often yield wildly divergent results. It often depends upon one's state of mind when taking the test. It also depends upon how well one knows oneself. Being neither a psychologist, nor a psychiatrist, I wouldn't dare diagnose DID (Dissociative Indentity Disorder, i.e. Multiple Personality Disorder) for anyone, but that's always a possibility.

 

[RedAmazoneFriendZone]

To me, the most obvious conclusion regarding these results is that you are well-dualized, and that's a good thing. That said, over the course of my many years of self-typing using various MBTI-type tools, I have occasionally flipped on I/E. I have flipped on S/N (but only once, and only barely--I am primarily N). I have also flipped on the F/T axis. I have never flipped on the J axis, however, and that means, in Socionics terms, that I am fundamentally rational.

The various, online, MBTI typing tools often yield wildly divergent results. It often depends upon one's state of mind when taking the test. It also depends upon how well one knows oneself. Being neither a psychologist, nor a psychiatrist, I wouldn't dare diagnose DID (Dissociative Indentity Disorder, i.e. Multiple Personality Disorder) for anyone, but that's always a possibility.

Yes those two aspects are very important : how well do you know yourself and which state of mind are you in when taking the test.

I don't have a DID and I think to be much more realistic and to enjoy freedom than most people around me do.

Under big stress I have been victim of my excess and was into borderline personality disorders. But... under big stress, isn't everyone exposed to the risk of one's "disorder".

I have learnt to respect my limits instead of thinking (unconsciously) I car bear anything and push things always further.

Many people ignore them until they develop a disease, or any symptoms.

For those that don't know themselves pretty well, their body will speak for them if they ignore the signals of their personal orange traffic light.


And.... yes.... I'm well dualized for an F ! I use a lot of logic too sometimes

Fortunately for me... an INFP told me I'm still abnormal. I was so glad to hear that I'm not the reflection of perfection

 

[Chrysanthe]

reluctantly EII-Ne.

 

[Kheledon]

reluctantly EII-Ne.

The one INFj, EII, Delta that I think I have typed correctly absolutely loathes personality tests. He has indulged me and taken a couple of them, but he considers them "bunk" and doesn't ever think these tests type him correctly. In fact, he believes himself to be "un-typable" and doesn't see any value in trying to "pidgeonhole" himself with some kind of test.

Just noting your use of the word ... reluctantly. To me, that sounds just like an EII.

Cheers!

 

[Punderstorm]

LII-Ne?

 

[Yama]

...I actually think I might be SLI in socionics despite being ISFJ in MBTI.

 

[Typh0n]

...I actually think I might be SLI in socionics despite being ISFJ in MBTI.

I doubt it. SLIs never talk about their feelings. You radiate SFness.

I know you weren't asking for my opinion, but there it is.

 

[fetus]

[MENTION=17945]Nixie[/MENTION] [MENTION=4945]EJCC[/MENTION] Vote on your types. They're the only ones with no votes.

 

[fetus]

Can...can this be a sticky post??

 

[Bush]

Can...can this be a sticky post??

yeah why the hell not, anything goes

 

[fetus]

yeah why the hell not, anything goes

Bucket list item completed!!

 

[Snickie]

Update: There is a distinct possibility that I might be LII.
I'll get back to y'all on that.
Eventually.

 

[Dreamer]

I hope there isn't a poll for this already. Anyways, what's your Socionics type? I didn't want to add a new option for each subtype, so just mention here which one you are. Remember, we're talking Socionics, not MBTI.

I am ISFp-Fe (SEI) to the core. Never found a better fitting type.

Talk.

I only took the test a couple times, and totally agree with the IEE-Fi variant. The Ne subtype does have bits and pieces of me, but it's the Fi subtype that really pinpoints me

 

[Such Irony]

LII-Ne?

If your username is Punderstorm, there's a good chance you are that type.


Also an LII-Ne, also love puns. I do identify some with EII, ILE, and even SEI though.

 

[fetus]

Come on where are you, my ILE friends?