• You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to additional post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), view blogs, respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please join our community today! Just click here to register. You should turn your Ad Blocker off for this site or certain features may not work properly. If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us by clicking here.

[Other Socionics] Why Quasi-identical aren't really alike

great_bay

New member
Joined
Jan 29, 2015
Messages
987
MBTI Type
intp
Enneagram
541
Qusdi-identical are relations in which both partners who share the same MBTI letters except for P and J difference. An example would be INTP and INTJ. Another example would be ENFP and ENFJ. In these pairings, to the outside observer, these people are virtually identical despite the J and P preference. However, these relations aren't really alike and here's why.

The first function of your partner is the hardest function to understand for the other which is the sixth function. INTP doesn't get Ni from INTJ. INTP aren't interested in foreseeing implications. INTJ on the other hand don't care about introverted thinking which is noticing logical inconsistencies. Because the first function the first function is the hardest to understand, INTP and INTJ aren't really alike. The only trait these people have in common is that they're both in the same intellectual club.

ENFP and ENFJ aren't so like. ENFJ aren't interested in interconnections to other contexts which is Ne. ENFP's aren't interested in extroverted feeling which is how others feel which sounds odd for a feeling type. The first function is the sixth function for both partners which is hard to understand for both partners. Trying to understand each other is like trying to play mental gymnastics.

In conclusion, qusidi-identical aren't really alike despite to the outside observer may think they're the same people. The first function is the sixth function which is the weakest and hardest to understand.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Pinina

New member
Joined
Dec 25, 2015
Messages
20
MBTI Type
ESTJ
Qusdi-identical are relations in which both partners who share the same MBTI letters except for P and J difference. An example would be INTP and INTJ. Another example would be ENFP and ENFJ. In these pairings, to the outside observer, these people are virtually identical despite the J and P preference. However, these relations aren't really alike and here's why.

The first function of your partner is the hardest function to understand for the other which is the sixth function. INTP doesn't get Ni from INTJ. INTP aren't interested in foreseeing implications. INTJ on the other hand don't care about introverted thinking which is noticing logical inconsistencies. Because the first function the first function is the hardest to understand, INTP and INTJ aren't really alike. The only trait these people have in common is that they're both in the same intellectual club.

ENFP and ENFJ aren't so like. ENFJ aren't interested in interconnections to other contexts which is Ne. ENFP's aren't interested in extroverted feeling which is how others feel which sounds odd for a feeling type. The first function is the sixth function for both partners which is hard to understand for both partners. Trying to understand each other is like trying to play mental gymnastics.

In conclusion, qusidi-identical aren't really alike despite to the outside observer may they're the same people. The first function is the sixth function which is the weakest and hardest to understand.

This stack sounds like MBTI.
The first function for an ESTJ, Te, would be the eight function of an ESTP. Both of those functions are 4D. The thing with quasi-identity is that you just flip the valued and invalid functions, they all keep their strength.
 
Top