• You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to additional post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), view blogs, respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please join our community today! Just click here to register. You should turn your Ad Blocker off for this site or certain features may not work properly. If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us by clicking here.

Gender: Social Constructs in the Animal Kingdom?

Cloudpatrol

Senior(ita) Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2016
Messages
2,163
Using the 38 minutes I've been stuck on hold to while away the time - indulging a mad personal interest - unusual creatures. It's occurring to me that they contain possible parallels to gender topics I've been discussing with others.

Do you think there is merit in looking to nature to observe gender roles? Or, should the human & animal arena’s be afforded entirely separate consideration?






 

Poki

New member
Joined
Dec 4, 2008
Messages
10,436
MBTI Type
STP
Instinctual Variant
sx/so
Using the 38 minutes I've been stuck on hold to while away the time - indulging a mad personal interest - unusual creatures. It's occurring to me that they contain possible parallels to gender topics I've been discussing with others.

Do you think there is merit in looking to nature to observe gender roles? Or, should the human & animal arena’s be afforded entirely separate consideration?







Interesting, but some people will take it as "nature is right" and cherry pick to support self.
 

Totenkindly

@.~*virinaĉo*~.@
Joined
Apr 19, 2007
Messages
50,192
MBTI Type
BELF
Enneagram
594
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp
At most, you could see how a natural selection process can lead to various expressions of sex and related behavior in the animal kingdom, which human beings are a part of.
So if you are interested in understanding the variety of sex and gender expression among human beings as biological animals, sure.

But some people don't approach it that way -- they don't accept natural section on the large scale as having given rise to homo sapiens.
Or on the other extreme, some assume that the ideal norm of natural selection is a law in itself and those things that don't conform to nature's plans are in some way deficient and shouldn't reproduce.
 

Jeremy8419

Permabanned
Joined
May 6, 2016
Messages
771
MBTI Type
INFJ
Enneagram
925
Instinctual Variant
so/sx
Omg, I hate these topics. The results are always wayyyyyyy backwards compared to average society, and people employ group-think to convince themselves that non-normative thoughts and behaviors are actually normative.

Nature isn't needed. Anthropology is enough. Also, sexual dimorphism is increasing in the human population, not decreasing. If it doesn't breed, it doesn't count biologically.
 

Ivy

Strongly Ambivalent
Joined
Apr 18, 2007
Messages
23,989
MBTI Type
INFP
Enneagram
6
Newsflash: gender noncomforming people breed too.
 

Jeremy8419

Permabanned
Joined
May 6, 2016
Messages
771
MBTI Type
INFJ
Enneagram
925
Instinctual Variant
so/sx
Newsflash: gender noncomforming people breed too.

Newsflash: Takes two sexes to breed. Heterosexual couple breeding. Doesn't matter what you call a peach, it's still a peach.
 

Jeremy8419

Permabanned
Joined
May 6, 2016
Messages
771
MBTI Type
INFJ
Enneagram
925
Instinctual Variant
so/sx
:shrug: I don't fucking care anymore. I'm a misanthrope who hates men and women equally.

I tried to let you yap at me in your blog lol.

I'm fairly positive this thread is Cloudpatrol seeking Jeremy attention and amusement lol.
 

Totenkindly

@.~*virinaĉo*~.@
Joined
Apr 19, 2007
Messages
50,192
MBTI Type
BELF
Enneagram
594
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp
I tried to let you yap at me in your blog lol.

I'm fairly positive this thread is Cloudpatrol seeking Jeremy attention and amusement lol.

...we're still waiting for the amusement.
 

SpankyMcFly

Level 8 Propaganda Bot
Joined
Nov 19, 2009
Messages
2,349
MBTI Type
INFJ
Enneagram
461
Instinctual Variant
so/sx
:shrug: I don't fucking care anymore. I'm a misanthrope who hates men and women equally.

That's it Evey! I'm reminded of this scene for some reason...




I got your back bro :D

2gujptd.jpg
 

Coriolis

Si vis pacem, para bellum
Staff member
Joined
Apr 18, 2010
Messages
27,230
MBTI Type
INTJ
Enneagram
5w6
Instinctual Variant
sp/sx
Is that what you have to do to get one? Express statements of misanthropy?
I thought that just made you a stereotypical INTJ.
 

Julius_Van_Der_Beak

Up the Wolves
Joined
Jul 24, 2008
Messages
19,449
MBTI Type
INTP
Enneagram
5w6
Instinctual Variant
sp/so
I thought that just made you a stereotypical INTJ.

It's an understandable enough position. I'm not sure why I feel like I've become less of one. I suppose it can probably be attributed to some of the drugs I've been prescribed.
 
Joined
Mar 2, 2016
Messages
625
Omg, I hate these topics. The results are always wayyyyyyy backwards compared to average society, and people employ group-think to convince themselves that non-normative thoughts and behaviors are actually normative.

Nature isn't needed. Anthropology is enough. Also, sexual dimorphism is increasing in the human population, not decreasing. If it doesn't breed, it doesn't count biologically.

Yeah, but 30,000 years ago we had larger brains, more genetic diversity, and features in primitive societies tended to favor faces with lower levels of sexual dimorphism. I think the patterns we have been seeing over the last 10,000 years may in some way be an accident of agriculture which mitigated risks of starvation leading to some breeding more quickly
 

Julius_Van_Der_Beak

Up the Wolves
Joined
Jul 24, 2008
Messages
19,449
MBTI Type
INTP
Enneagram
5w6
Instinctual Variant
sp/so
Interesting, but some people will take it as "nature is right" and cherry pick to support self.

I'm not sure how. All the creatures she selected undergo mating patterns that are obviously very different from humans, and from each other, even. Compare praying mantises with flatworms, for instance.
 

Magic Poriferan

^He pronks, too!
Joined
Nov 4, 2007
Messages
14,081
MBTI Type
Yin
Enneagram
One
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp
There's an enormous amount of diversity in the animal kingdom. There are great behavioral differences even between us and the other apes. Therefore, it's absurd when someone tells me about human mating behavior because of a study about North American gray tree frogs (that is an actual thing that happened). You can't just point to an animal doing something and declare what they do "natural" in some universal way. This approach is obviously set up for nothing but cherry picking, where one person picks and animal who's behavior matches their position, and then the other person picks an animal that contradicts it. Back and forth, accomplishing nothing.

Furthermore, there's a question of when it is necessary. I'm often amused at people bypassing observed behavior in actual humans to try explaining by way of the behavior of some far removed animal. It actually transpires (has on this forum, in fact) that people will sometimes disregard the direct data on what humans are actually doing to argue that they somehow should be doing something else because some fucking shrew does it or something.

Now, some attempts have been done to study broad trends in animals in the hopes of finding sexual characteristics that apply to human beings. That's a lot better, but it's not perfect. I repeat that the animal kingdom is vast and diverse, such that even an apparently broad trend across some subject animals may really be too small. It's process that remains under a fairly balanced amount of controversy even among the top scholars in the relevant fields.

I guess the thing I'd really need to emphasize is the difference between an inherited trait (a trait that is the product of genes possessed by an organism at conception) and acquired traits (traits obtained through interaction within the environment, especially after birth). Not all animals are equal in terms of much they acquire traits. Some do it very little, some do a lot, and what's extremely important is that as far as we know at this time, no animal acquires traits more than humans. This would suggest that humans are the least subject to broad rules about genetically inherited behavior.

On that note, sex and gender are different things. Sex, perhaps we can discuss, but gender, I'm convinced is so socially constructed (acquired, therefore) that there's little to be understood about human gender by looking at other animals. The only thing that strikes me as interesting there is if we find what appears to be socially constructed gender in another species (which we may have). There might actually be something to learn from that.
 

Julius_Van_Der_Beak

Up the Wolves
Joined
Jul 24, 2008
Messages
19,449
MBTI Type
INTP
Enneagram
5w6
Instinctual Variant
sp/so
There's an enormous amount of diversity in the animal kingdom. There are great behavioral differences even between us and the other apes. Therefore, it's absurd when someone tells me about human mating behavior because of a study about North American gray tree frogs (that is an actual thing that happened). You can't just point to an animal doing something and declare what they do "natural" in some universal way. This approach is obviously set up for nothing but cherry picking, where one person picks and animal who's behavior matches their position, and then the other person picks an animal that contradicts it. Back and forth, accomplishing nothing.

Furthermore, there's a question of when it is necessary. I'm often amused at people bypassing observed behavior in actual humans to try explaining by way of the behavior of some far removed animal. It actually transpires (has on this forum, in fact) that people will sometimes disregard the direct data on what humans are actually doing to argue that they somehow should be doing something else because some fucking shrew does it or something.

Now, some attempts have been done to study broad trends in animals in the hopes of finding sexual characteristics that apply to human beings. That's a lot better, but it's not perfect. I repeat that the animal kingdom is vast and diverse, such that even an apparently broad trend across some subject animals may really be too small. It's process that remains under a fairly balanced amount of controversy even among the top scholars in the relevant fields.

I guess the thing I'd really need to emphasize is the difference between an inherited trait (a trait that is the product of genes possessed by an organism at conception) and acquired traits (traits obtained through interaction within the environment, especially after birth). Not all animals are equal in terms of much they acquire traits. Some do it very little, some do a lot, and what's extremely important is that as far as we know at this time, no animal acquires traits more than humans. This would suggest that humans are the least subject to broad rules about genetically inherited behavior.

Well, yeah. Debates about gender often hinge on the naturalistic fallacy, but the naturalistic fallacy is just that. The thing is that you can't deduce things about gender in humans from studying a black-widow spider anymore than you can deduce rules about sex for lions from studying black-widow spiders.

On that note, sex and gender are different things. Sex, perhaps we can discuss, but gender, I'm convinced is so socially constructed (acquired, therefore) that there's little to be understood about human gender by looking at other animals. The only thing that strikes me as interesting there is if we find what appears to be socially constructed gender in another species (which we may have).

What species would that be, possibly?
 
Top