User Tag List
Results 1 to 5 of 5

01162014, 10:32 PM #1
The Sum of All Natural Numbers = 1/12
"Everyone has a plan till they get punched in the mouth." Mike Tyson
Life is about the journey, because we already know the destination.

01172014, 01:10 PM #2
I know the mathematician on the left looks hideous. But if anybody's watched the video, do you have an explanation for the move from step 1 to step 2?
"Everyone has a plan till they get punched in the mouth." Mike Tyson
Life is about the journey, because we already know the destination.

01172014, 01:49 PM #3
Essentially, you can do anything to an equation as long as you'd keep it balanced. You can 'prove' your own assumption(s) or use one(s) that has been proven. The aim is to continually get the numbers into a condensed enough form to properly solve. In S2: Adding the equation to itself has been shown as valid as well as the process of shifting it... since you are not changing any of the values. Any mathematical proof is valid unless a part of it can be disproved.

01172014, 02:09 PM #4
You say that shifting the lower series when adding them is "as valid as" balancing an equation. That's true because nothing has been added to the second series, it's just a null value at the beginning of the series. Adding nothing to a series doesn't change the series.
There is more to the proof, it has to do with convergent and divergent series. The idea is to cause the sum of the two series to converge, but the theory behind this is not included in the video."Everyone has a plan till they get punched in the mouth." Mike Tyson
Life is about the journey, because we already know the destination.

01172014, 02:31 PM #5
I wouldn't compare the two; some notions are more likely to be disproved than others... balancing is not one that is in question. Yes... adding the series to itself and multiplying the 'S2' by two is keeping it balanced. When you'd shift the second row to add the numbers... this is a rule that many are taken aback by initially (so I thought I'd mention that). It's deemed as valid in itself because none of the individual values would be changed in doing so  the top and bottom would always equal one another. There is more than just 'balancing' involved here... but it seems solid so far.
Similar Threads

The sum of all our parts
By King sns in forum General PsychologyReplies: 17Last Post: 09262011, 07:00 PM 
I'm new, but I'm not sure I understand the point of all this...
By thedusen in forum MyersBriggs and Jungian Cognitive FunctionsReplies: 15Last Post: 04212009, 02:38 AM 
The Jack of All Types
By LucrativeSid in forum MyersBriggs and Jungian Cognitive FunctionsReplies: 26Last Post: 12172008, 09:50 PM 
for the benefit of all mankind
By entropie in forum The BonfireReplies: 5Last Post: 05222008, 10:45 AM 
The Human Mind  the sum of its parts or something more?
By Geoff in forum General PsychologyReplies: 6Last Post: 05152007, 06:14 PM