@ Satine: One last thing that I missed; in your typing of Foreman you mentioned that he doesn't seem to have House's ability to connect disparate ideas and interweave patterns. This is because Foreman is Ni-dom which is very different from House's very strong Ne. Ni, unlike Ne, doesn't find hidden patterns; its role is to predict events and solve paradoxes. You seem to have run into the same snag in typing Foreman as you did in typing me: you conflated the two intuitive functions. In his case it made you think Foreman as an N would think in a similar way to House, and in my case it made you think I as a Te-aux would act in a similar way to an NTJ.
House simply manages to bring out the creativity and intuition in them through brainstorming. Infact House has to force them to come up with ideas. At 1st all of them give answers which sound obvious . Then he dismisses them and keeps on stepping on their shoes till they simply come up with better answers. And thus the intuition that we see.
@ Satine: One last thing that I missed; in your typing of Foreman you mentioned that he doesn't seem to have House's ability to connect disparate ideas and interweave patterns. This is because Foreman is Ni-dom which is very different from House's very strong Ne. Ni, unlike Ne, doesn't find hidden patterns; its role is to predict events and solve paradoxes. You seem to have run into the same snag in typing Foreman as you did in typing me: you conflated the two intuitive functions. In his case it made you think Foreman as an N would think in a similar way to House, and in my case it made you think I as a Te-aux would act in a similar way to an NTJ.
The way I saw it, you presented an opinion. I told you, in what I thought was a respectful manner, why I disagree. If I sounded condescending or in any way offended you, I apologize. It was not my intention.While I respect that you have a different opinion than me, and may just have valid arguments, it would appear you could benefit from a lesson in formulating what you're trying to communicate in a way that does not sound like you're telling people what to think or do
I shared an opinion with you, on why i think you might be ENTP (Btw..this answer just reinforced that idea). I did not claim you were entp and couldn't possibly be anything else. It would be nice to get the same courtesy from you when you disagree with me on something and not to be put in my place like a child, especially not by someone who's been here less time than I have and doesn't know me. At all.Presuming to know how I generally think and what (logical or otherwise) mistakes I'm likely to make without this information is therefore rather arrogant. After all, this is all sheer conjecture as MBTI is a theory, and this is not based on simple facts. You *gasp* could be wrong just as much. If you are in fact ENFP, let's see you practise that silver tongue of yours. You could benefit greatly from it.
Now to sweeten the Te-pill: in no way was this meant in a snarky way, or did I mean to disrespect you. I however do no care for being talked to in this way and wanted to communicate that
The way I saw it, you presented an opinion. I told you, in what I thought was a respectful manner, why I disagree. If I sounded condescending or in any way offended you, I apologize. It was not my intention.
thanks for this. I'll fully admit to being a bit hypersensitive to even remotely being told what to do or how to think. Hence the reaction. No bad feelings, really, and I sincerely I hope I didn't cause any in you
SJs, generally speaking, have no Ni at all. Foreman, on the other hand, shows signs of having no Ne at all (which SJs do have, as a lower function).
In a more data-oriented way? I disagree. Most of the time it's House who rejects ideas coming from his fellows rather than the other way around. All of them are in on the process of connecting symptoms into a diagnosis -- Ne synthesizing work.
Don't worry about it. I'm not very easy to offend. 
