User Tag List

First 678

Results 71 to 72 of 72

  1. #71
    Senior Member Meek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011


    I met a 7 year old with a tongue piercing once on the boulevard near where I grew up. She even had parental permission on a piece of paper.
    The piercing shop was actually doing illegal piercings, though. I thought it was highly wrong and her tongue was hugely swollen, like her tongue was
    too small to be pierced. I wasn't sure but it did look horrible to me.
    I have no special talent. I am only passionately curious.-
    Albert Einstein

  2. #72
    Senior Member shoshana's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011


    Quote Originally Posted by Lark View Post
    This is sort of a tangent from the other thread about prohibiting circumcision, I thought I would ask others about a practice I've only just heard about which is being picked up on the peripheral radar of family law and social services in the UK (predictably). I'll start with how I heard about it.

    It began with a picture advertising a tattooists in the neighbouring town which someone who I know is expecting posted on facebook of a baby with photoshopped tattoos on them. I asked them if they thought it was real or anyone would ever tattoo a baby, they said no it was only promo material but that they knew of cultures in which children, adolescents and adults get tattoos as a rite of passage. So at this point I was thinking that would be a good subject for a topical discussion and made the link with the other thread.

    However, I found out since then that there are families considering employing tattoos as child protection measures (this is where the authorities get involved, the trauma contra the possibly benefits, the law is also already pretty clear about the age at which people can receive tattoos and it isnt for minors) sort of like an indelibable ID in case of kidnap.

    I'm not sure there could be any benefit, I think of the sorts of people who kidnap and traffic kids as merciless and evil and would probably torturously remove any "tagging".

    The cultural question is a different one I think, if you prohibit a family from tattooing a child when all the rest of their family, peers and community do so you could be setting them up for social exclusion. I'm not sure that the state should usurp the authority or cultural practices of parents and families which are not neglectful, abusive or cruel towards their children.
    I'm pretty sure most tattoo artists wouldn't go near a person under 16 even if they were with a parent or guardian....

    on a side note i know depending on the tattoo ink color there are trace metals in the pigments... i wonder, depending on the age of the child, how the pigments would interact with a body that is undergoing such drastic changes in body chemistry.

    seems like a ridiculous notion to believe that tattooing an individual that is not old enough to consent to sex would ever be considered lawful (regardless of the intention to 'protect' the child).

Similar Threads

  1. ENTJs: how would you characterize your extroversion?
    By Lily Bart in forum What's my Type?
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 06-25-2010, 08:41 PM
  2. [NT] NTs: How would you describe your ideal SO?
    By Wind Up Rex in forum The NT Rationale (ENTP, INTP, ENTJ, INTJ)
    Replies: 180
    Last Post: 08-28-2009, 12:39 PM
  3. What would you name your kids?
    By swordpath in forum The Bonfire
    Replies: 235
    Last Post: 08-20-2009, 08:18 PM
  4. [NT] How would you spend your money if you are rich?
    By yenom in forum The NT Rationale (ENTP, INTP, ENTJ, INTJ)
    Replies: 38
    Last Post: 06-20-2009, 06:46 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO