User Tag List

First 6141516

Results 151 to 152 of 152

  1. #151
    Senior Member lowtech redneck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007


    Quote Originally Posted by ragashree View Post
    Underlying principles, which indeed only modernisers are going to be interested in changing, are indeed long-standing, but this is a separate issue.

    I wouldn't like to assume that this is the case in Muslim majority countries, or even other countries with a lot of Muslim immigrants.

    I'm not really interested in whether current practice conforms to your definition of "modernising" (which is up to Muslims to decide whether they want to do, not us non-Muslims to insist on them needing to do to conform to our own expectations)
    1.) You mean underlying principles such as Shariah law and the non-separation between Mosque and state (within the parameters covered by Shariah), not to mention opposition to free speech as in the case of the OP article?

    2.) a.) I didn't want to assume that, either....

    b.) The strict taboos against blasphemy and apostasy make attempts at
    necessary theological reform very difficult and extremely dangerous
    for would-be reformers.

    3.) I'm afraid I'm going to have to insist that traditionalist Muslims adopt "liberal" interpretations of Islam; the auspices must come through the Muslim community, but external pressures in that direction (particularly within Western countries themselves) are needed as an impetus, just as my own "in-group" (white Southerners) needed such pressures to facilitate a change in racial attitudes. I also will not allow charges of "Islamophobia" or "Orientalism" to intimidate me from insisting that Muslims follow the same minimum standards of behavior that I apply to Christians and atheists. If you are simply unconvinced that contemporary Muslim beliefs are a major problem, that's fine, but I take serious issue with that last statement I quoted.

  2. #152
    psicobolche tcda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009


    The point is not what one thinks the correct interpretation of the texts should be, but that religious texts are manipulated to serve material interests in different conjunctures, and that precisely because of their mateaphysical nature they are open to this kind of manipulation.

    This is why even if some of the more "theological" claims about Islam are true, it is not that relevant in practice. The Jewish, Christian and Buddhist religious institutions are responsible for just as much crime against humanity as Islamic ones are.
    "Of course we spent our money in the good times. That's what you're supposed to do in good times! You can't save money in the good times. Then they wouldn't be good times, they'd be 'preparation for the bad times' times."

    "Every country in the world owes money. Everyone. So heere's what I dont get: who do they all owe it to, and why don't we just kill the bastard and relax?"

    -Tommy Tiernan, Irish comedian.

Similar Threads

  1. is it possible to be a peaceful muslim?
    By Il Morto Qui Parla in forum Philosophy and Spirituality
    Replies: 58
    Last Post: 04-23-2010, 09:11 PM
  2. Teachers stage fake gun attack on kids
    By digesthisickness in forum Politics, History, and Current Events
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 12-29-2009, 04:35 PM
  3. Conservative attacks on health confirmed
    By rivercrow in forum Politics, History, and Current Events
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 09-11-2008, 03:36 PM
  4. "Attack of the Killer Tomatoes" to be remade...
    By The Ü™ in forum Arts & Entertainment
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 03-12-2008, 06:21 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO