• You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to additional post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), view blogs, respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please join our community today! Just click here to register. You should turn your Ad Blocker off for this site or certain features may not work properly. If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us by clicking here.

The lower your social class, the ‘wiser’ you are, suggests new study

Joined
Mar 2, 2016
Messages
625
There’s an apparent paradox in modern life: Society as a whole is getting smarter, yet we aren’t any closer to figuring out how to all get along. “How is it possible that we have just as many, if not more, conflicts as before?” asks social psychologist Igor Grossmann at the University of Waterloo in Canada.

The answer is that raw intelligence doesn’t reduce conflict, he asserts. Wisdom does. Such wisdom—in effect, the ability to take the perspectives of others into account and aim for compromise—comes much more naturally to those who grow up poor or working class, according to a new study by Grossman and colleagues.

“This work represents the cutting edge in wisdom research,” says Eranda Jayawickreme, a social psychologist at Wake Forest University in Winston-Salem, North Carolina.

To conduct the study, Grossmann and his graduate student Justin Brienza embarked on a two-part experiment. First, they asked 2145 people throughout the United States to take an online survey. Participants were asked to remember a recent conflict they had with someone, such as an argument with a spouse or a fight with a friend. They then answered 20 questions applicable to that or any conflict, including: “Did you ever consider a third-party perspective?” “How much did you try to understand the other person’s viewpoint?” and “Did you consider that you might be wrong?”

Grossmann and Brienza crunched the data and assigned the participants both a “wise reasoning” score based on the conflict answers and a “social class” score, then plotted the two scores against one another. They found that people with the lowest social class scores—those with less income, less education, and more worries about money—scored about twice as high on the wise reasoning scale as those in the highest social class. The income and education levels ranged from working class to upper middle class; neither the very wealthy nor the very poor were well represented in the study.

In the second part of the experiment, the duo recruited 200 people in and around Ann Arbor, Michigan, to take a standard IQ test and read three letters to the Dear Abby advice column. One letter, for example, asked about choosing sides in an argument between mutual friends. Each participant then discussed with an interviewer how they thought the situations outlined in the letters would play out. A panel of judges scored their responses according to various measures of wise reasoning. In the example above, thinking about how an outsider might view the conflict would earn points toward wisdom, whereas relying only on one’s own perspective would not.

As with the first part of the experiment, those in lower social classes consistently had higher wise-reasoning scores than those in higher social classes, the researchers reported today in the Proceedings of the Royal Society B. IQ scores, however, weren’t associated one way or another with wise reasoning.

The findings make sense, Jayawickreme says, as people who grow up in a working-class environment have to rely on shared, communal resources more than people in the middle class, and therefore hone social techniques that smooth out conflicts with their peers. Those in the middle class, in contrast, tend to focus on education, which improves their IQ scores, but they don’t put nearly as much effort into conflict resolution skills, Grossmann says.

If you want to foster wise reasoning in yourself, Grossmann advises, try to use third-person language when thinking about conflicts. Mentally address both yourself and your conflict partner by name, for example, as it forces you to see the situation as others would see it. And seek out situations where your own experiences and expectations aren’t in the spotlight, such as by attending a multicultural movie festival or by volunteering at a homeless shelter.

Eventually, Grossman wants to expand his study of wisdom to people at the extremes of social class. “I would not be surprised if the result is even more pronounced in the extremely wealthy, but we don’t have the data to speak to it yet,” he says. “I would love to interview Donald Trump.”

The lower your social class, the ‘wiser’ you are, suggests new study | Science | AAAS
 
Joined
Sep 20, 2016
Messages
393
MBTI Type
ISIS
Enneagram
9w8
Instinctual Variant
so/sx
I think higher class someone is the more complicated life gets, which I think is backed up by the rising standard of living over time and the society that it has produced. When life is more complicated, its easy to become distracted from what some people would call the "important issues" in favor of lesser issues aka "first world problems". I think the lower class someone is, the more apparent the important issues become, and when they are forced to the forefront they are longer on ones mind, which means that any conclusion arrived at as a result is more likely to be air-tight, and doubly so because there is more riding on it where as someone who is more well off might find a quick fix and then continue to distract themselves until they need another. Simply put, the less resources you have the better your solutions to problems need to be or you simply won't make it. Just my theory.
 

Agent Washington

Softserve Ice Cream
Joined
Jan 24, 2017
Messages
2,053
They then answered 20 questions applicable to that or any conflict, including: “Did you ever consider a third-party perspective?” “How much did you try to understand the other person’s viewpoint?” and “Did you consider that you might be wrong?”​
A cursory reading suggests that the questions may have to do with empathy and multiperspectivity.

Seems linked to the idea that the rich lack empathy:
The Rich Lack Empathy, Study Says - The New York Times
The Rich Are Different: More Money, Less Empathy | TIME.com
How the Rich are Different from the Poor II: Empathy | Psychology Today
How Wealth Reduces Compassion - Scientific American
 

Lark

Active member
Joined
Jun 21, 2009
Messages
29,568
Could this study possibly be confusing street smarts with wisdom? Wisdom is not even the same as intelligence or learning and most of the time those things are mistaken for recall capacities.
 

Mole

Permabanned
Joined
Mar 20, 2008
Messages
20,284
Could this study possibly be confusing street smarts with wisdom? Wisdom is not even the same as intelligence or learning and most of the time those things are mistaken for recall capacities.
The lower your social class, the worse your social outcome.
 
Top