• You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to additional post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), view blogs, respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please join our community today! Just click here to register. You should turn your Ad Blocker off for this site or certain features may not work properly. If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us by clicking here.

Inclusive Christianity?

sophiedoph

New member
Joined
Aug 29, 2008
Messages
94
MBTI Type
INFJ
The other day I was talking to a man who declares himself to be a devoted Christian and he said something which shocked me. It was something to the effect that it doesn't matter what religion one professes "because it's all the same God anyway."

I remember when political correctness began to take hold in popular culture and at that time I was still a practicing Christian. Tangled in the mess of p.c. I made an attempt to convince myself that this was a truism.

The reason his statement shocked me was because I just realized for the first time that a Bible-believing Christian cannot make that statement without violating a tenet of their faith.

I do understand the concept of an Ultimate Spirit which drives the universe but, unless one picks and chooses what to subscribe to and what to reinterpret in the Bible, according to scripture that would have to be the Triune God and none other.

What are your thoughts on this?

I appreciate respectful discussion of all views.

Because not all Christians think that's a tenant of the Christian faith. Only the literalists do. (*Jen is a liberal Christian*)
 

cafe

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 19, 2007
Messages
9,827
MBTI Type
INFJ
Enneagram
9w1
I think the differences between the OT and NT are God adjusting for environment. Plus, Christianity was created to be a religion alone, not a religion and a form of government like Judaism was. Stuff like that.
 

nolla

Senor Membrane
Joined
May 22, 2008
Messages
3,166
MBTI Type
INFP
I think the differences between the OT and NT are God adjusting for environment.

I don't think god would make such a drastic change in his principles. (how arrogant of me to think what god would think, isn't it ;) )

Plus, Christianity was created to be a religion alone, not a religion and a form of government like Judaism was. Stuff like that.

This is a lot more understandable explanation.
 

sophiedoph

New member
Joined
Aug 29, 2008
Messages
94
MBTI Type
INFJ
I hope that is true nolla.

I think every religion needs by definition to be exclusive. And when an attempt is made to make it all-inclusive it gets watered down.

I am not sure, but I don't necessarily agree. I think one of the most important elements of a religion is spirituality--a connection to some Divine, some something, bigger than oneself. And generally that connection is *supposed* to lead you to be a better person, inspire you, give strength and encouragement when needed, etc.

Unfortunately there will always be those who feel the need to add rules.:shock:

I think a religion doesn't need to be exclusive--it can cater to "preferences." I am a liberal Christian. Do I think that Christianity is the only way? I don't really think so. I think CS Lewis articulated the idea in the Chronicles of Narnia series that anyone who "worships" (for lack of a better term) Love (a Divine being of brotherly Love) worships God.
 

Anja

New member
Joined
May 2, 2008
Messages
2,967
MBTI Type
INFP
Hey. You guys are tres kewl! So many things struck me here since I last read. Too much to take in.

We've had a shift in weather and I've had a shift in energy level to go with it. So I'm at a disadvantage at the moment. And the afternoon's tasks beckon.

With what's been posted in mind, the first thought that came as I read was something a friend quoted to me to the effect that if one isn't a liberal in youth one has no heart; and if one is not a conservative in later life one has no brain. Hee. As so many aphorism do, it seems to play true. You can translate that into, "The older Anja gets, the more she sounds like an old phart!"

Yeah, throw the dang cripples out of church. That's why I had to leave - I got tired of sitting in the back row with my sexually tempting tresses covered and my very busy mouth shut! :D

I'm off to hear an old and wise man speak words of wisdom about living well to a large group of seekers.

Later.
 

sophiedoph

New member
Joined
Aug 29, 2008
Messages
94
MBTI Type
INFJ
I hear you Anja. Unfortunately I was told I was going to hell because after much research I rejected the notion of Creationism. I was disowned by my parents and my church because at 22 I moved in with my now-husband (OMG before marriage!).

I was raised as a fundamentalist Christian. I rejected such a stance when my own research and experience led me away from that perspective. I became atheist for a number of years, but have now decided on a more liberal view of Christianity as the expression of my spirituality and my faith.

Unfortunately, to get me to admit I am a Christian is very difficult. I have experienced, and I know so many others have too, such rejection and hurt from "the fundamentalist right." I would never, ever want to be associated with them, in any sense of the word.
 

The_Liquid_Laser

Glowy Goopy Goodness
Joined
Jul 11, 2007
Messages
3,376
MBTI Type
ENTP
The new church has become more focussed on the positive aspects of Christianity but the "believe and be baptised or else the loving God who created you will burn you in hell forever" element is undeniably there and no amount of focus on positives or trying to put it into historical perspective can erase it to my thought.

I don't have time to comment on everything in this thread, but I want to make one point here. I've said I'm a "Bible-believing" Christian, but I don't think the idea of burning in hell forever is supported by the Bible. I think that idea is somewhat influenced by the Pagan ideas that got infused into Christianity during the Middle Ages. (Ever ask yourself what eggs and bunnies have to do with the resurrection of Jesus? It's the same sort of thing.)
 

Anja

New member
Joined
May 2, 2008
Messages
2,967
MBTI Type
INFP
Two people here who have escaped the snares of Fundamentalism. I'm impressed. It was difficult enough to pull out of Lutheranism and took me years of processing. Fear. Guilt.

Some day I'd like to hear about how one accomplishes that with an eventual clean break.

_____________________________________________________________

The wise man gave an excellent talk. The one thing I heard well was him saying that he needs to keep his conscience clean in order to live well.

Then he made the comment, "Imagine me finding a conscience!" I've known him for years and suspect that he is an XSTP.

He explained how he kept his conscience clean. He said, "I don't violate MY values system." (Emphasis mine.)

Of course I had to give him some grief about that afterwards, but I left feeling very much in tune with his sense of a path of spiritual growth.
 

Anja

New member
Joined
May 2, 2008
Messages
2,967
MBTI Type
INFP
I don't have time to comment on everything in this thread, but I want to make one point here. I've said I'm a "Bible-believing" Christian, but I don't think the idea of burning in hell forever is supported by the Bible. I think that idea is somewhat influenced by the Pagan ideas that got infused into Christianity during the Middle Ages. (Ever ask yourself what eggs and bunnies have to do with the resurrection of Jesus? It's the same sort of thing.)

I don't see that. There's no where in the Bible that I can remember it referencing bunnies and eggs. But I do recall casting sinners down into a lake of fire. And something about perpetual gnashing of teeth. Wherever it came from it's in there.
 
S

Sniffles

Guest
but I don't think the idea of burning in hell forever is supported by the Bible.

Jesus makes references to Hell in the Gospels, although the original Greek uses the term Hades.

I think that idea is somewhat influenced by the Pagan ideas that got infused into Christianity during the Middle Ages.

Highly unlikely since the Church Fathers made references to Hell before the Medieval period.

(Ever ask yourself what eggs and bunnies have to do with the resurrection of Jesus? It's the same sort of thing.)

It goes under the concept of inculturation, where certain cultural traditions and customs are incorporated into the faith. This dates back to the days of the Apostles. Pope Gregory the Great even decreed that any custom that didn't contradict Christian teachings could be incorporated. Another part of the logic was the commonalities between such customs and many of the folk customs of the Israelites in the OT.
 
Joined
Jun 6, 2007
Messages
7,312
MBTI Type
INTJ
With what's been posted in mind, the first thought that came as I read was something a friend quoted to me to the effect that if one isn't a liberal in youth one has no heart; and if one is not a conservative in later life one has no brain. Hee. As so many aphorism do, it seems to play true. You can translate that into, "The older Anja gets, the more she sounds like an old phart!"

It's funny, I've heard this aphorism many times as well, but it played out exactly the opposite for me. As a young man I was very conservative and even held a leadership role in the Young Republicans chapter of my college. Over the years I've mellowed though, and now I'd call myself a centrist who is a social liberal and a fiscal conservative. I've even voted Democrat in 3 of the 5 presidential elections I have been eligible to vote in.
 

The_Liquid_Laser

Glowy Goopy Goodness
Joined
Jul 11, 2007
Messages
3,376
MBTI Type
ENTP
I don't see that. There's no where in the Bible that I can remember it referencing bunnies and eggs. But I do recall casting sinners down into a lake of fire. And something about perpetual gnashing of teeth. Wherever it came from it's in there.

There are three Greek words in the New Testament that get translated into hell. One is only used once (referring to a place of darkness). Another word is "Hades" which means "the grave", and the last is "Gehenna" which literally refers to a large area where they would burn garbage. In all but one case the word "Gehenna" is used when associating hell with fire.

My point though is that the Bible doesn't depict hell as eternal torture. It depicts it as death or destruction, i.e. being destroyed by fire.

"Do not fear those who kill the body, but are unable to kill the soul; but rather fear Him who is able to destroy both body and soul in hell." Matt. 10:28 (emphasis mine)

Consider also these two well known passages:
"...whoever believes in him shall not perish, but have eternal life." John 3:16
"For the wages of sin is death, but the free gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord." Romans 6:23 (again empasis mine)

Preachers often portray the choice as being between heaven and hell. However the Bible portrays the choice as being between life and death. The alternative to life is not torture. It's death. Some people reinterpret death to mean torture. I don't. I believe death literally means death.
 
Top