There is much wisdom in this post.
Interesting. I agree about it not becoming all financial, but don't seem to have trouble finding other ways to show kindness. I might offer to do a job at work that no one likes but has to be done, like put out the lab trash. Or I might write a note (actual paper snail-mail note) to someone I haven't been in touch with for awhile, or give someone a ride somewhere, or do an extra volunteer activity. It can be hard to find one for every single day, then again I might do several on one day, say write several letters.
If I was being picky I'd say that the note writing or lift giving take fuel or paper and pen so its some sort of resource transfer again but I see what you mean. The thing about doing the unpleasant work for a change is interesting, and useful, I've periodically done that too but I've realised, that especially in a work environment, you could be enabling slackers or competency challenged people to carry on like there's not a problem or creating an expectation that never existed before. Its a difficult one but I know what you mean, its a worthy goal. I could write a book about the hard and long thinking I've done about altruism, in many ways I despise organised and planned selfishness and most organised and planned altruism the same for very different reasons.
The promise of the afterlife has often been used by those in power to manage the expectations of the disadvantaged.
That's true but its been part of the expectation of the managers too, Nietzsche was one of the first to articulate the idea of being life affirming, in other words THIS life affirming, so that you should not forego any pleasure or describe any pleasure as sinful which is itself a pleasure. So far so good. Although a lot of the aphorisms and thinking which stem from it can be very wicked, it oft quoted saying for instance from him that "its better to seek forgiveness than permission" is a rapists charter, I know of more than one instance when someone who was an actual rapist had heard it and believed it. Nietzsche's supporters or defenders would say that he wouldnt possibly have endorsed such an outcome of his thinking, maybe that's true but I can see how it is a logical extension of his thinking.
That said I do support the life affirming ideas for the most part, although in the main because of older religious traditions, such as the judeo-christian which maintain that life is a gift, that the world is a gift, that the world was, is and will one day be restored as paradise and that God's judgement will not simply involve punishing evil doing but questioning why anyone has forgone the pleasure of life which has been provided to them and for them or prayers answered.
Too much of a good thing? There is definite value in the highlighted. It is a much better way to view what often is protrayed as simple self-denial, in that it focuses on the benefit to the person taking on the discipline. It also ties in with many meditation practices I know of. I used to meditate rather regularly; perhaps this Lent I should work on reestablishing the habit.
I do surely think that discipline has a part in it, effort especially so, its possible to get addicted to the easy life and then when the disillusion follows it to confuse the easy life with life per se.
Russell talks about that in The Conquest of Happiness, he describes it as Byronic Unhappiness, although Russell wouldnt have had any truck with religion or spirituality.
Meditation and centring exercises would definitely have something to do with it too, especially in so far as it results in altered states of consciousness, raised awareness etc.
The whole question of being and having is an old one, Fromm actually suggested that the being mode was the way to go but in most of his writing and those he was drawing on as primary sources, would suggest that its something its only possible to partially realise as an individual while social structures like the economy, education, the family, work etc. etc. all seek, consciously and unconsciously, to foster the having one instead.