User Tag List

12 Last

Results 1 to 10 of 15

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    23,481

    Default Religion is a universal

    Would you agree that religion is a universal in all human societies and all ages of mankind? If it a universal is it something which can or should be better understood?
    All for ourselves, and nothing for other people, seems, in every age of the world, to have been the vile maxim of the masters of mankind.
    Chapter IV, p. 448. - Adam Smith, Book 3, The Wealth of Nations

    whether or not you credit psychoanalysis itself, the fact remains that we all must, to the greatest extent possible, understand one another's minds as our own; the very survival of humanity has always depended on it. - Open Culture

  2. #2
    Sniffles
    Guest

    Default

    Yes it very much is an universal phenomenon, one which only seems to appear among humans(animals don't have religions). National Geographic recently ran a story about how recent archelogical discoveries may suggest that religion was a major cause of civilization itself.

    As for understanding religion better, certainly - but I guess one has to establish what understanding it better actually means. Trying to apply a positivist methodology for example can actually hinder such a task.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    23,481

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Peguy View Post
    Yes it very much is an universal phenomenon, one which only seems to appear among humans(animals don't have religions). National Geographic recently ran a story about how recent archelogical discoveries may suggest that religion was a major cause of civilization itself.

    As for understanding religion better, certainly - but I guess one has to establish what understanding it better actually means. Trying to apply a positivist methodology for example can actually hinder such a task.
    Yes. And true, true.

    A lot of the Nat Geo coverage and archeological re-evaluations tend to fall within the context of a pretty reductive evolutionary psychological paradigm, which even when its opposing Dawkin's delusion theory or meme theory does adopt a "this handy illusion" theory based upon the consciousness that someone leaving a room does not cease to exist if they do so.

    Better understood, yes, that is not clear, I meant that since it is universal and persumably was also so utilitarian for so long that it could be understood in an appreciative or respected manner as opposed to the pretty conceited "this has nothing to add", "silly primal theories" trend which is pretty prevalent.
    All for ourselves, and nothing for other people, seems, in every age of the world, to have been the vile maxim of the masters of mankind.
    Chapter IV, p. 448. - Adam Smith, Book 3, The Wealth of Nations

    whether or not you credit psychoanalysis itself, the fact remains that we all must, to the greatest extent possible, understand one another's minds as our own; the very survival of humanity has always depended on it. - Open Culture

  4. #4
    Sniffles
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lark View Post
    A lot of the Nat Geo coverage and archeological re-evaluations tend to fall within the context of a pretty reductive evolutionary psychological paradigm, which even when its opposing Dawkin's delusion theory or meme theory does adopt a "this handy illusion" theory based upon the consciousness that someone leaving a room does not cease to exist if they do so.
    This is true, and something that needs proper addressing among scholarly debate.

    Better understood, yes, that is not clear, I meant that since it is universal and persumably was also so utilitarian for so long that it could be understood in an appreciative or respected manner as opposed to the pretty conceited "this has nothing to add", "silly primal theories" trend which is pretty prevalent.
    In that case absolutely yes. I thought you were referring to specific methodology of study. Well it seems Religious studies is on the rise within academic research - so obviously the subject of religion is starting to get more attention. I've mentioned before here the rise of the perspective of "Post-Secularism" among scholars studying the subject matter as well. So we'll see where this leads.

  5. #5
    Senior Member Synapse's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    MBTI
    INFP
    Enneagram
    4
    Socionics
    INFp
    Posts
    3,403

    Default

    Yes it should be better understood...

  6. #6
    Senior Member KDude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    8,255

    Default

    Religion probably started with burying the dead. And maybe campfire sing a longs. Also, food poisoning might have contributed in some cases.

  7. #7
    Gotta catch you all! Blackmail!'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    MBTI
    ENTP
    Enneagram
    7w8
    Posts
    2,934

    Default

    Is Conservative propaganda "a universal" in all human societies and all ages of mankind? If it a universal is it something which can or should be better understood?
    "A man who only drinks water has a secret to hide from his fellow-men" -Baudelaire

    7w8 SCUxI

  8. #8
    & Badger, Ratty and Toad Mole's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    18,924

    Integration and Dissociation

    Quote Originally Posted by Blackmail! View Post
    Is Conservative propaganda "a universal" in all human societies and all ages of mankind? If it a universal is it something which can or should be better understood?
    Oh Blackmail, how we have missed you. But to address the issue -

    There has never been a civilization not based on a religion. And it seems to me that religions operate below the level of rational thought and operate beautifully in the world of trance.

    The Gospels were written in a trance and induce a trance in the reader. And the repetitive rituals of religions are trance inductions.

    And trance reaches down into our deepest fears and hopes. And trance forms our very identity. And trance forms the very basis of our institutions.

    We wake every morning to the biting of ants, so to speak, as we make our way rationally through the day and reality. But at night we slip into the arms of morpheus who gives us the trance of sleep to refresh us for the rigours of the day ahead. No wonder we love trance. Trance provides us relief from pain, fear and suffering. Trance is indeed our beloved.

    So during our waking hours we long for our beloved, and our beloved longs for us, and our beloved is our God, and we are God's children.

    "Thy Kingdom come", we pray. We want to create heaven on Earth. We want trance to suffuse our daily reality.

    'Religio', means to rebind. We are split creatures. We are split between waking and sleeping. Our deepest and most profound desire is to integrate the two. And religion, religio, binds the two together. Religion binds up our wounds. Religion heals our sin. Religion is the promise of integrity. Religion is the heart in a heartless world.

    The Saints show us the way by living in both trance and reality at the same time. For the rest of us, we wake and sleep, wake and sleep, longing for the integration of the Saints but living in this vale of tears, dissociated.
    Last edited by Mole; 10-28-2011 at 07:25 PM.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    23,481

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Peguy View Post
    This is true, and something that needs proper addressing among scholarly debate.


    In that case absolutely yes. I thought you were referring to specific methodology of study. Well it seems Religious studies is on the rise within academic research - so obviously the subject of religion is starting to get more attention. I've mentioned before here the rise of the perspective of "Post-Secularism" among scholars studying the subject matter as well. So we'll see where this leads.
    Post-secularism? I never thought of or heard of that before, that could be interesting.
    All for ourselves, and nothing for other people, seems, in every age of the world, to have been the vile maxim of the masters of mankind.
    Chapter IV, p. 448. - Adam Smith, Book 3, The Wealth of Nations

    whether or not you credit psychoanalysis itself, the fact remains that we all must, to the greatest extent possible, understand one another's minds as our own; the very survival of humanity has always depended on it. - Open Culture

  10. #10
    Senior Member swordpath's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    MBTI
    ISTx
    Posts
    10,554

    Default

    Better understood?

    Undoubtedly. If religion were better understood we wouldn't have assholes strapping bombs to children and blowing up the market place.

Similar Threads

  1. Is the Universe a Simulation?
    By Vasilisa in forum Philosophy and Spirituality
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 02-23-2014, 05:29 PM
  2. Is Unitarian Universalism controlling in any way?
    By The Wailing Specter in forum Philosophy and Spirituality
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 01-07-2014, 08:04 PM
  3. religion is a cop out
    By miss fortune in forum Philosophy and Spirituality
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 01-31-2012, 06:17 PM
  4. The central question of religion is not the existence of God?
    By Lark in forum Philosophy and Spirituality
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 01-25-2012, 04:16 PM
  5. What religion is your bra?
    By Sahara in forum The Fluff Zone
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 07-31-2007, 06:33 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO