• You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to additional post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), view blogs, respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please join our community today! Just click here to register. You should turn your Ad Blocker off for this site or certain features may not work properly. If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us by clicking here.

Something deep or profound

Mole

Permabanned
Joined
Mar 20, 2008
Messages
20,284
The double-slit interference pattern is fundamental to waves. Attributing the resulting pattern to "measurement error" is quite a stretch (measurement has a dramatic effect, certainly, but that dramatic effect is not an "error"). The experiment is actually pretty convincing evidence that the particles were "behaving like waves" , because the interference pattern is exactly what would be produced by waves.

Today we can do the double slit experiment one photon at a time. And we find that each photon acts as a particle but that the spread of the particles takes the shape of a wave.

So the physical reality is a particle and the statistical reality is a wave.
 

Octarine

The Eighth Colour
Joined
Oct 14, 2007
Messages
1,351
MBTI Type
Aeon
Enneagram
10w
Instinctual Variant
so
The whole point about quantum mechanics is that reality is described neither by classical particle or wave mechanics, but only by quantum mechanics.

Single photons interfere with themselves in a wave-like manner and that is simply not possible in classical model.
 

Mole

Permabanned
Joined
Mar 20, 2008
Messages
20,284
The whole point about quantum mechanics is that reality is described neither by classical particle or wave mechanics, but only by quantum mechanics.

Single photons interfere with themselves in a wave-like manner and that is simply not possible in classical model.

With the measurement of single photons we now know that single photons don't interfere with themselves in a wave like manner. Rather the single photons together form a wave pattern, which can be predicted statistically.

So we now know the answer to the question, is it a wave or a particle? And the answer is that it is a particle.
 

Octarine

The Eighth Colour
Joined
Oct 14, 2007
Messages
1,351
MBTI Type
Aeon
Enneagram
10w
Instinctual Variant
so
With the measurement of single photons we now know that single photons don't interfere with themselves in a wave like manner. Rather the single photons together form a wave pattern, which can be predicted statistically.

Only if you interpret the results in classical way.
 

Mole

Permabanned
Joined
Mar 20, 2008
Messages
20,284
Only if you interpret the results in classical way.

It's not a question of interpretation for each photon can be shot singly and recorded singly. And there is no actual wave. The wave is purely statistical.
 

violet_crown

Active member
Joined
Jun 18, 2009
Messages
4,959
MBTI Type
ENTJ
Enneagram
853
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp
2803vbl.jpg
 

Antimony

You're fired. Lol.
Joined
Jun 11, 2009
Messages
3,428
MBTI Type
ESTP
Enneagram
8w7
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp
The answer is always present: it is the path that is concealed.
 
S

Sniffles

Guest
Can't get any deeper or profound than this!
[youtube="QcAnOlPh7Yo"]2 plus 2 is four[/youtube]
 

Antimony

You're fired. Lol.
Joined
Jun 11, 2009
Messages
3,428
MBTI Type
ESTP
Enneagram
8w7
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp
:cry:

:peepwall:

I'm going to be rocking in a corner for weeks.
 
Top