Accepting the risk does not imply that I will not do everything to mitigate damages should it occur.
Natural does not matter. If you got a severe infection, it's not natural to survive it. Yet, we intervene with antibiotics.
I really am not sure how else to explain this... as soon as conception occurs, it is my belief that another human life must be taken into account, so at that point intervention is essentially murder. Not in the gunshot, knife wound sort of way, more like the what was once both alive and human is now no longer alive by the purposeful actions of another human without just cause because the victim is innocent.
As I stated earlier the bottom line disagreement is what is human life essentially. All these other things are just distractions. Here, I will provide a diagram:
It is my belief that human life begins when the 2 arrows become one. The egg and the sperm alone will remain that way, it is when by our choices they are joined them that another life begins. Not every time, but you're rolling the dice either way. My point about the auto accident is that our choices have consequences.
So the question here is, what is the correct choice of action? I say, allow nature to run its course as we know and expect it to and accept the responsibility of your actions. Others say, make up for the outcome at the expense of another's life. However, I know the "make up for our mistakes" attitude is largely what dominates our society. Overweight? Diet and exercise are slow and painstaking, why not liposuction or this mystery pill? That way, you can keep overeating, because the problem is not they you're stuffing your face, it's that stuffing your face makes you fat, and damnit we dont like that! WTF nature, how could you.
