• You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to additional post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), view blogs, respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please join our community today! Just click here to register. You should turn your Ad Blocker off for this site or certain features may not work properly. If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us by clicking here.

Is language essential for rational thinking?

nightning

ish red no longer *sad*
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
3,741
MBTI Type
INfj
Is it possible to think without using words? Thinking in the most generalized case doesn't need to involve words... for example when I ask you to think about a horse... the first thing that appears in your mind is probably an image of a horse rather than a description of what a horse is... or the word HORSE. Words are simply the means to provide a symbolic representation towards ideas/objects... the way to store multiple experiences we have on a given topic. It appears to me to be a way to get around the limits of our mental processing capacity (working memory is 7 plus minus 2 objects). By labelling a huge list of experiences together as a symbol (one word), we can now start to relate different experiences/ideas together.

Here's a what-if scenario... What if our minds have unlimited processing capacity... do we still need language to think rationally? Feel free to completely bash this nonsensical idea if you feel like it... just provide justification for your thoughts.
 

Siúil a Rúin

when the colors fade
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
14,036
MBTI Type
ISFP
Enneagram
496
Instinctual Variant
sp/sx
Very complex ideas are communicated through the arts w/o language. This is especially true of music, visual arts, and dance. Although I supposed it could be argued that those are another form of language just with different symbols and processes. They do often more immediately recreate an experience, and are more concretely representative of their meanings than words which tends to have rather arbitrary relationship to their meaning.

When you extend the concept of language to include sensory communication as in the arts, then that does open up a continuum in which it is necessary to include animal communication as having the rudiments of language, just more concrete. Wolf calls, dolphin songs, as two examples. Dolphin calls have specific sounds for each member, much like names. An offspring's identifying sound is related to their parent's. Penguins have unique calls to identify mated pairs. (Yes I watched March of the Penguins multiple times. ) Animals do have specific sounds that represent specific actions. Certain barks tell pups to return to the den because of danger, etc.

In my experience, my most complex thoughts are experienced w/o words.
 

Attachments

  • galactic grunge.jpg
    galactic grunge.jpg
    125 KB · Views: 1,617
  • neon gotham.jpg
    neon gotham.jpg
    65.4 KB · Views: 1,718

nightning

ish red no longer *sad*
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
3,741
MBTI Type
INfj
When you extend the concept of language to include sensory communication as in the arts, then that does open up a continuum in which it is necessary to include animal communication as having the rudiments of language, just more concrete. Wolf calls, dolphin songs, as two examples. Dolphin calls have specific sounds for each member, much like names. An offspring's identifying sound is related to their parent's. Penguins have unique calls to identify mated pairs. (Yes I watched March of the Penguins multiple times. ) Animals do have specific sounds that represent specific actions. Certain barks tell pups to return to the den because of danger, etc.
Interesting idea you brought up... art form and animal communication as language. From that definition, does that deligate language as a means of facilatating communication between conspecifics? What about communication with ourselves? It seems to me that we need language for introspection... or is that just natural tendency for us because we're use to doing it with other people?

The second thing you mentioned about wordless experience of thoughts. Is there a distinction between experiencing something compared to analyzing something? The former can be done unconsciously, while the latter must be done consciously with words?
 

Dark Razor

New member
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
271
MBTI Type
ENTJ
Enneagram
8w7
I think laguage is not necessary to think about complex ideas, it is however necessary to accurately communicate them. You certainly can communicate complex subjects through the arts and such, but then the expression of your thoughts are open to a wide range of interpretations, while thoughts processed through the filter of (adequate) language are much more precise and to the point. Though I must say that communication through language is a rather cumbersome process for something like me who thinks primarily in pictures, it would be much easier if I just could telepathically communicate the images in my head, but since that is not possible language remains the most efficient and precise alternative.
 

cafe

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 19, 2007
Messages
9,827
MBTI Type
INFJ
Enneagram
9w1
I remember, when I was little, noticing that I no longer thought without words. I felt a little sad. I was a little sad, too, when I realized I could no longer look at words without reading them. I don't know why.

I think I was having rational thoughts before I thought in words.
 

HilbertSpace

New member
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
143
MBTI Type
INTP
I do think that language, to a large extent, constraints thoughts. Thoughts also create language, of course - the two systems mutually inform - but I'm of the school that says language is paramount. I think that systems are characterized by information exchange, so I include all communication - from tail-wagging to bacteria establishing a chemical gradient - under the general category of language.

At the same time, I think that we do exercises in things like naive physics (the thing that lets you catch a Frisbee without thinking about it) without calling to mind terms like vector or parabola. There's still 'language' going in with your brain, but it's something biochemical - it's not English, or even mathematics.
 

nightning

ish red no longer *sad*
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
3,741
MBTI Type
INfj
I think laguage is not necessary to think about complex ideas, it is however necessary to accurately communicate them. You certainly can communicate complex subjects through the arts and such, but then the expression of your thoughts are open to a wide range of interpretations, while thoughts processed through the filter of (adequate) language are much more precise and to the point.
I wish telepathy exists... I had thought conversations with myself, those are way way more effective and rapid in comparison to saying everything out loud. It's true that with language, we can communicate ideas more clearly than art form. However it's still subjected to interpretation. Words carry slightly different connotations from person to person, but certainly variations will be significantly less than art/music etc.

I remember, when I was little, noticing that I no longer thought without words. I felt a little sad. I was a little sad, too, when I realized I could no longer look at words without reading them. I don't know why. I think I was having rational thoughts before I thought in words.
The joys of childhood... I really miss it too. :cry:

So there can be rational thoughts without words? I'm not sure if anybody else have done this, but I sometimes talk to my ummm altered ego? in my head. It's a way of clearing things up by talking to myself. I really wanted to track these conversations but whenever I tried to do that it just doesn't work well. Typing it out, way too slow. The process of typing means I have to repeat everything that is said to myself in order to type. Even speaking out loud and recording doesn't work. Because then I have to repeat what the voice in my head said. It interrupts the flow of the conversation. Also you can convey thoughts about an idea so much quicker in your head without words. It's almost like flashing isolated images with continously running emotion as commetary. The whole incident is over within a second or two. Something you just can't record in words. But that has always been more about experiencing something rather than like thinking to me. Hmmmm...

At the same time, I think that we do exercises in things like naive physics (the thing that lets you catch a Frisbee without thinking about it) without calling to mind terms like vector or parabola. There's still 'language' going in with your brain, but it's something biochemical - it's not English, or even mathematics.

Hmmm so we get into the issue of conscious vs unconscious "thinking"... whether the automatic processing our brain do, say to instinctively know what angle to throw something at to hit a target, is rational thinking or not.
 

SolitaryWalker

Tenured roisterer
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
3,504
MBTI Type
INTP
Enneagram
5w6
Instinctual Variant
so/sx
We think in ideas and translate them into symbols, not the other way around.

Language is fundamental to communication of ideas and not creation of them.

So no, language is not necessary for rational thought.
 

Attachments

  • 7555410266_55618c6cb8_o.jpg
    7555410266_55618c6cb8_o.jpg
    133.1 KB · Views: 577

nightning

ish red no longer *sad*
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
3,741
MBTI Type
INfj
We think in ideas and translate them into symbols, not the other way around.

Language is fundamental to communication of ideas and not creation of them.

So no, language is not necessary for rational thought.

Ah! But how much of a difference is there between ideas and symbols? Have the use of symbolism (aka language) become so ingrained in us that we think/explain ideas to ourselves using words? That is how do we communicate an idea to ourselves without using words? Is there a way of describing that process?
 

Attachments

  • 8795184741_da6f9c24b3_o.jpg
    8795184741_da6f9c24b3_o.jpg
    212.9 KB · Views: 98

SolitaryWalker

Tenured roisterer
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
3,504
MBTI Type
INTP
Enneagram
5w6
Instinctual Variant
so/sx
Ah! But how much of a difference is there between ideas and symbols? Have the use of symbolism (aka language) become so ingrained in us that we think/explain ideas to ourselves using words? That is how do we communicate an idea to ourselves without using words? Is there a way of describing that process?


No it is not possible to communicate without language. Symbols become strongly attached to our ideas, yet they can only invade certain ideas, yet not the creator of ideas in itself-the mind. So the mind produces without symbols and they only stick to some that have been influenced earlier on by the language that we have encountered in the world.

Symbolic representation of ideas can only come from the outside, not from within, therefore it is not possible for an idea to be born with a symbol. Maybe shortly after its birth it may be attached to one, but this will be because of its affiliation with ideas that have long been associated with a particular symbol.
 

nightning

ish red no longer *sad*
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
3,741
MBTI Type
INfj
No it is not possible to communicate without language. Symbols become strongly attached to our ideas, yet they can only invade certain ideas, yet not the creator of ideas in itself-the mind. So the mind produces without symbols and they only stick to some that have been influenced earlier on by the language that we have encountered in the world.

Symbolic representation of ideas can only come from the outside, not from within, therefore it is not possible for an idea to be born with a symbol. Maybe shortly after its birth it may be attached to one, but this will be because of its affiliation with ideas that have long been associated with a particular symbol.

But why can't an idea be a symbol? What is an idea if not connection made between different things? No idea can exists by itself without context. Can the symbol not be just a label for the idea? Hmmmm this is getting into sematics. Symbol is what the idea is called... vs idea is what the symbol means. Are to two the same or different?
 

SolitaryWalker

Tenured roisterer
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
3,504
MBTI Type
INTP
Enneagram
5w6
Instinctual Variant
so/sx
But why can't an idea be a symbol? What is an idea if not connection made between different things? No idea can exists by itself without context. Can the symbol not be just a label for the idea? Hmmmm this is getting into sematics. Symbol is what the idea is called... vs idea is what the symbol means. Are to two the same or different?

Ideas are born within our minds. An idea is necessary in order to create a symbol, yet a symbol as we understand it to be in a conventional language can not be born within the mind. It must involve at least two ideas, the idea that is immanent within it and the idea of the symbol.
 

nightning

ish red no longer *sad*
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
3,741
MBTI Type
INfj
Hmmm so thought itself isn't completely symbolic... but it ultilizes symbols. Great...
 

SolitaryWalker

Tenured roisterer
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
3,504
MBTI Type
INTP
Enneagram
5w6
Instinctual Variant
so/sx
Hmmm so thought itself isn't completely symbolic... but it ultilizes symbols. Great...

Only after it has been exposed to symbols. But then again a symbol could be concocted from within, as we can make words up for example, but nonetheless utilization of symbols stems from unconscious associations, yet they are not fundamental to thought, they are supplemental.


Symbols are not necessary for rational thought because they have been created by communicators, and were not natural entailments of birth of ideas.
 

nightning

ish red no longer *sad*
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
3,741
MBTI Type
INfj
Only after it has been exposed to symbols.

In the current society... is it possible to not be exposed to symbols? Even in animals certain sounds have symbolic representations. As HebertSpace had been saying... chemical concentration gradient that bacteria uses can be symbolic. In terms of the mental capacity of the human mind, will thoughts be at the level/complexity it currently is without the use of symbols?

Edit: point taken, but nonetheless symbolics play a large role in our thinking
 

Ivy

Strongly Ambivalent
Joined
Apr 18, 2007
Messages
23,989
MBTI Type
INFP
Enneagram
6
I don't think we can fully dissect rational thought from language. The act of learning language imposes structure on the mind. Therefore, even if one is capable of experiencing nonverbal thought (as in Daphne's music/art example), the thought is taking place in a mind that has been structured by a native tongue.
 

SolitaryWalker

Tenured roisterer
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
3,504
MBTI Type
INTP
Enneagram
5w6
Instinctual Variant
so/sx
I don't think we can fully dissect rational thought from language. The act of learning language imposes structure on the mind. Therefore, even if one is capable of experiencing nonverbal thought (as in Daphne's music/art example), the thought is taking place in a mind that has been structured by a native tongue.


Language impresses itself upon certain ideas of ours that are commonplace in our thought, but not on the mind itself. The mind does not think in symbols, only some ideas that it comes up with later (perhaps even within less than a second of their birth) get attached to them.
 

Ivy

Strongly Ambivalent
Joined
Apr 18, 2007
Messages
23,989
MBTI Type
INFP
Enneagram
6
Language impresses itself upon certain ideas of ours that are commonplace in our thought, but not on the mind itself. The mind does not think in symbols, only some ideas that it comes up with later (perhaps even within less than a second of their birth) get attached to them.

I disagree. I think the very act of learning a language irreversibly changes the mind. (Or, I guess reversibly-- it seems to atrophe in the case of feral children who once knew some language.)
 

SolitaryWalker

Tenured roisterer
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
3,504
MBTI Type
INTP
Enneagram
5w6
Instinctual Variant
so/sx
I disagree. I think the very act of learning a language irreversibly changes the mind.

We can easily think about things that we can not talk about, or not yet be able to express them in a linguistic format. It is clear that our new ideas that have not been symbolized will be influenced by our acquaintance with symbols in the past, our new ideas do not depend on them for their existence. So despite that language does irreversible change the mind, it is still not necessary for rational thought.
 

Ivy

Strongly Ambivalent
Joined
Apr 18, 2007
Messages
23,989
MBTI Type
INFP
Enneagram
6
We can easily think about things that we can not talk about, or not yet be able to express them in a linguistic format. It is clear that our new ideas that have not been symbolized will be influenced by our acquaintance with symbols in the past, our new ideas do not depend on them for their existence. So despite that language does irreversible change the mind, it is still not necessary for rational thought.

What I'm saying is that we cannot ultimately separate rational thought from language-- even though we're capable of thinking wordlessly, we're still thinking wordlessly in a mind constrained (and, in other ways, set free) by language. There's still the one-degree-of-separation between the ineffable and our thought processes, and it's because of our language. It is still ineffable, but the rigor that language imposes on the brain prevents us from fully experiencing the ineffable.

Do you remember how emotions seemed so much more raw before you had the linguistic skills to symbolize them? Now that you can say "I feel angry," anger has less potency.
 
Top