• You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to additional post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), view blogs, respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please join our community today! Just click here to register. You should turn your Ad Blocker off for this site or certain features may not work properly. If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us by clicking here.

How important are binding rules or laws?

Lark

Active member
Joined
Jun 21, 2009
Messages
29,569
How important do you think that binding rules and laws are?

Do you think that people more often observe and respect rules and laws or seek to find some sort of work around or just ignore them entirely in favour of something else such as personal authority or charisma?
 

StrawberryBoots

New member
Joined
Dec 29, 2016
Messages
407
How important do you think that binding rules and laws are?
It's not clear on how deep you want to go with this discussion.

Regarding civil rules and laws, a meeting of the minds that certain actions are required or prohibited seems important if one wants the option of legal recourse.

Regarding the rules and laws mentioned in the Old Testament of the Bible, they're only important up to the point that they're fulfilled by the blood of Christ in the New Testament (see Hebrews 8:7-9, 13) and the gift of grace is received by faith. In the New Testament (New Covenant), God says He will put His laws on our minds and write them on our hearts. The laws that God puts in our minds and writes on our hearts is the law of love (see Matthew 22:37–40), the law of liberty (see James 1:25) and the law of faith (see Romans 3:27).


Do you think that people more often observe and respect rules and laws or seek to find some sort of work around or just ignore them entirely in favour of something else such as personal authority or charisma?
I think the average person is naturally rebellious with selfish intentions, and they'll typically do what serves them and their lusts (to the detriment of others).
 

Virtual ghost

Complex paradigm
Joined
Jun 6, 2008
Messages
19,769
It's not clear on how deep you want to go with this discussion.

I think the average person is naturally rebellious with selfish intentions, and they'll typically do what serves them and their lusts (to the detriment of others).

I find this claim to be much more cultural than universal.
 

Tengri

New member
Joined
Mar 19, 2016
Messages
558
How important do you think that binding rules and laws are?
Fairly important depending on what behaviors or human tendencies those laws are meant to constrain. Consider the importance of structure and ethical guidelines in childhood, especially during the delicate stage of personality formation under age 10. During this phase of life, children look to model, imitate, and reproduce the language, ideas, concepts, and habits of their parents, teachers, older siblings, and most pointedly their peers. Cognitive development throughout this part of childhood mirrors the environment, in my opinion, more than anything else, so consistent, reinforcing, and a safe (or affectionate) environment that mirrors those morals or ethics is extremely important for either lawful, or at least conscientious upbringing. Through adolescence and into adulthood, many cases have set precedence for laws that essentially prevent human mistakes, crimes of passion, deter dishonesty or misuse or abuse, or simply enforce order.

Do you think that people more often observe and respect rules and laws or seek to find some sort of work around or just ignore them entirely in favour of something else such as personal authority or charisma?
I think that most people respect the spirit of the law, even if they overlook them situationally. Traffic laws are important, but since many are self-enforcing, there is a high chance that they are ignored or broken when there is little danger of being caught. A moral interpretation of laws conflates a function of civil society with individual goodness, which I think muddies the ethical boundaries of individual and citizen. Running a traffic light is not a morally reprehensible crime - but colliding with another vehicle who's driver was under the assurance that others were trained in safe use of their vehicle and observing traffic laws meant to prevent such accidents, is. Many laws are snapshots of a particular culture or style of thinking: gatekeeping laws like the prohibition of alcohol, exploitative models that allowed slavery, or more modern examples of civil rights and gender protection. I remember reading a Supreme Justice once stating that laws are meant to predict and mold the general population to new, progressive, or just values that benefit human rights overall, and I think in a perfect world responsible lawmaking is exactly that. The elephant in the room that will always stymie rational, progressive lawmaking are the myriad opinions, values, religious outlooks, and ancient hard-coded traditions of human culture. As long as laws reflect the current era and evolve organically with people, they won't become, what Weber called an 'iron cage,' that exist simply for brutal control. If dystopia is its symptom, roundatable rulemaking is its opposite. In the same sense, people will follow laws naturally if they reflect their relative values. The contradiction here is that as culture changes and new laws are enacted to fence in human nature so to speak, it's that very elephant that decides the rules, not idealized notions of progress - this is the tool to shape (or at worst, control) the human condition.
 

tony_goth

Pseudo-delusional Rebel
Joined
Sep 18, 2018
Messages
225
MBTI Type
ENFJ
Enneagram
487
Instinctual Variant
sx
How important do you think that binding rules and laws are?

As important as their contribution to people's well-being is. No more no less.

Do you think that people more often observe and respect rules and laws or seek to find some sort of work around or just ignore them entirely in favour of something else such as personal authority or charisma?

Authority is based on their force and people's confidence. People will abide to authority as much as they think they should. No more no less.
 
Top