• You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to additional post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), view blogs, respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please join our community today! Just click here to register. You should turn your Ad Blocker off for this site or certain features may not work properly. If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us by clicking here.

Specialist or Generalist? Convince me!

nightning

ish red no longer *sad*
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
3,741
MBTI Type
INfj
A comment from bluemonday
In that case, you sacrifice differentiation. No-one can develop all functions equally. I'd rather concentrate on what I'm good at than strive for some impossible perfection.

Reminded me of this question. Why is being a specialist better than a generalist? By specialist, I mean people who dedicate their learning to one specific (often narrow) field. Generalists would be the reverse, those who aim to learn about a variety of subjects. The way I see it, there are cases where having a wider range of skill set seems beneficial to me then being completely focused on one thing. Feel free to convince me otherwise.
 

Jack Flak

Permabanned
Joined
Jul 17, 2008
Messages
9,098
MBTI Type
type
Of course there are cases where that is so. Fewer today than a hundred years ago, or ten thousand years ago.
 

Angry Ayrab

New member
Joined
Mar 31, 2008
Messages
600
MBTI Type
ENFP
I don't know... but even though I personally prefer being a generalist, hell I despise details, I sure would prefer an orthopedic spine surgeon to work on my cracked back (hasn't happened yet and hoping to keep it that way) than my FP physician.
 

Giggly

No moss growing on me
Joined
Jun 12, 2008
Messages
9,661
MBTI Type
iSFj
Enneagram
2
Instinctual Variant
sx/so
Specialists get more respect and make more money but they aren't having more fun.
 

INTJMom

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 28, 2007
Messages
5,413
MBTI Type
INTJ
Enneagram
5w4
I think both serve an important purpose. It wouldn't be good to have all one or all the other.
As an INTJ, I tend to specialize because I only want to do something I can be competent at.
I can't be competent at everything, therefore I can only be good at so many things.
On the other hand, I remember when I was a teen thinking that I was a jack of all trades.
I had a lot of general knowledge, but I wasn't necessarily great at any one thing.
 

kyuuei

Emperor/Dictator
Joined
Aug 28, 2008
Messages
13,964
MBTI Type
enfp
Enneagram
8
Hmm.. I think specialists are more useful when it comes to tedious things that need many careful, planned and practiced details.

Generalists keep the world running on a massive scale with mediocre skills.. I'd want a professional specialist on my A/C unit, but I might only hire a lawnmower to do my lawn instead of an over-qualified professional landscaper.

I think both are quite necessary.

The reason why specialists are better is because you're paying for knowledge and experience in whatever field of study they are in. If I wanted my wedding cake custom made and crazy-decorated, I'd be paying extra for the experience and expertise of a person who's qualified to do that sort of thing, instead of just going to a regular cake place.

In the case of one's self though.. personal preference is all you can count on. I like learning so many (too many) new things, without ever bothering to master any of them.. but someone could be so engrossed into whatever they want that it makes them happy just doing that.
 

miss fortune

not to be trusted
Joined
Oct 4, 2007
Messages
20,589
Enneagram
827
Instinctual Variant
sp/so
both are necissary, as kyuuei pointed out...


I can't be anything but a generalist (or as my mom calls me "a jack of all trades and master of none" :dry:)... there's too many interesting things out there to try and learn some about!

I'm glad that some people have the ability to concentrate down into a specialization though- it makes the medical practices more precise (and more expensive :( )
 
S

Sniffles

Guest
Interesting, I was just about to post a thread with a similar theme.

Both are necessary, and we need a more balanced respect for both approaches. Sadly we've tipped the scales insanely in favor of the specialist - the point we have specialists who specialise in nothing.

As for me, Im a staunch generalist. As the old saying goes: "Jack of all trades, master of none, though often better than a master of one."
 

Simplexity

New member
Joined
Jul 15, 2008
Messages
1,741
MBTI Type
INTP
Interesting, I was just about to post a thread with a similar theme.

Both are necessary, and we need a more balanced respect for both approaches. Sadly we've tipped the scales insanely in favor of the specialist - the point we have specialists who specialise in nothing.

As for me, Im a staunch generalist. As the old saying goes: "Jack of all trades, master of none, though often better than a master of one."

I've actually had this as a recurring topic in a lot of my thoughts for a while now. I think there are a lot of relations and connections to be made with this timeless topic. Off the top of my head is creativity and forward movement and progress in industries and careers.

What about specialization and generalization from youth?

Do you think the trade offs vary based at what stage you decide to go in one direction or the other?

Is there sort of a potentiating effect with each one. That is to say is it necessary to specialize in order to understand the worthwhile generations you can make or vice versa.

In terms of education what should the focus be on?

Do you think a country's education is at cause for developing individuals in one way or the other?

I'm mentally tired right now, and not feeling very articulate so sorry for the copout answer.
 

FDG

pathwise dependent
Joined
Aug 13, 2007
Messages
5,903
MBTI Type
ENTJ
Enneagram
7w8
Depends on what you are better suited for. A natural generalist will be a rather crappy specialist. However, you have to take into account that there are niches that for specialization require integration of a large number of subjects; moreover, unless your aim is to be come the most specialized of the world, if you're smart enough you may be able to become a specialist without sacrificing general knowledge.
 

animenagai

New member
Joined
Aug 22, 2008
Messages
1,569
MBTI Type
NeFi
Enneagram
4w3
i'm a jack of all trades ENFP, but i definitely see the worth in have a specialty. in a world of capitalism and division of labor, it pays to have a specialty.
 

nightning

ish red no longer *sad*
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
3,741
MBTI Type
INfj
Of course there are cases where that is so. Fewer today than a hundred years ago, or ten thousand years ago.
True.

Specialists get more respect and make more money but they aren't having more fun.
Where is the respect coming from? Because they can do something few others can do?

Generalist. Specialist out of element=fucked.
*nods* Too narrow a field and you lose flexibility to adapt in change. Good point.

both are necissary, as kyuuei pointed out...

I can't be anything but a generalist (or as my mom calls me "a jack of all trades and master of none" :dry:)... there's too many interesting things out there to try and learn some about!

I'm glad that some people have the ability to concentrate down into a specialization though- it makes the medical practices more precise (and more expensive :( )
*nods* I share the sentiment with both of you.

Interesting, I was just about to post a thread with a similar theme.

Both are necessary, and we need a more balanced respect for both approaches. Sadly we've tipped the scales insanely in favor of the specialist - the point we have specialists who specialise in nothing.
I'm actually planning on writing something up relating to the scale being completely imbalanced in favor for specialists. Science is one. Research is great, but the knowledge never reaches far beyond people in the specific field. I wince every time I see people misuse research findings for their own purposes and the public eating it up. The second is in web design and development. The sentiments there is you ought to be in one or the other. But there's a niche market for generalists... people never acknowledge the factor though. That's why I started this topic to ask people's opinions and get more ideas. :)

As for me, Im a staunch generalist. As the old saying goes: "Jack of all trades, master of none, though often better than a master of one."
I did not realize there's more to the saying... heh! Thank you.

I've actually had this as a recurring topic in a lot of my thoughts for a while now. I think there are a lot of relations and connections to be made with this timeless topic. Off the top of my head is creativity and forward movement and progress in industries and careers.
*nods* That is the main problem I see for web design/dev. It's a field subjected to massive changes. I thought it ought to be sensible to have at least a basic understanding of the whole... It's all interconnected! But the community seems to disagree. Many of the designers are clueless when it comes to even HTML, let alone front-end dev. So you get projects from the dev team pass on to the design team to "pretty up". That's about all the interactions the two gets. :rolli:

What about specialization and generalization from youth?
I think you ought to at least try a little bit of everything to figure out what you want before you specialize. It makes very little sense for a youth to specialize right off the bat. Crippling your foundation really.

Do you think the trade offs vary based at what stage you decide to go in one direction or the other?
Well they do say the older you get, the less easily you can adapt to change. Being a generalist, you must adapt to change. So people tend to specialize as they get older...

Is there sort of a potentiating effect with each one. That is to say is it necessary to specialize in order to understand the worthwhile generations you can make or vice versa.
Not especially. People tend to forget that the difference between specialist vs generalist is only in whether people recognize the field as being "specialized" or not. A generalist can actually be doing a very "specific" job, it just doesn't have a name attached to it per se. In a company, the generalists will best serve as facilitators to coordinate the different teams of specialists.

Another example, 10 years or so back... Web design and development didn't even exist as a field. But with the start of the internet era, you get people with different backgrounds, often generalists taking up the new niche. Then suddenly overtime, it became a specialty. Do you see where I'm getting at? They're just names... both are equally important and will serve just as well without the labelling.

In terms of education what should the focus be on?

Do you think a country's education is at cause for developing individuals in one way or the other?
Education is whatever the individual needs right? But the current system does have a heavy emphasis on specializing. After all special schools for individual fields are easy enough to set up, a "generalist" school is a lot more difficult. About the only ones I can think of is in my knowledge is something like the integrated science program at my university. It's definitely a minority.

I'm mentally tired right now, and not feeling very articulate so sorry for the copout answer.
I think the questions are helpful in understanding the issue. Thanks!

Depends on what you are better suited for. A natural generalist will be a rather crappy specialist. However, you have to take into account that there are niches that for specialization require integration of a large number of subjects; moreover, unless your aim is to be come the most specialized of the world, if you're smart enough you may be able to become a specialist without sacrificing general knowledge.
Exactly what I was getting at. The distinction between the two blurs in a fast paced environment. The way the economy is going, the wider your skill set, the more likely you're to survive. I seriously think some specialists are screwing themselves not thinking about alternatives.

Okay... so it seems like everybody likes generalists. Funny I would have thought there'll be more disagreement.

Any specialists around that wants to list out reasons as to why they specialized?
 

INTJMom

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 28, 2007
Messages
5,413
MBTI Type
INTJ
Enneagram
5w4
...
As an INTJ, I tend to specialize because I only want to do something I can be competent at.
...

 

Angry Ayrab

New member
Joined
Mar 31, 2008
Messages
600
MBTI Type
ENFP
screw it, I am going to be an orthopedic spine surgeon, just so I can say I am, and then go back and work in a FP clinic. :devil:
 

ygolo

My termites win
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
5,988
We're all specialists, whether we like it or not.

We only have access to one life-time's worth of activity. We will generally have interests in some things but not others.

A "generalist" is a mythical creature, IMO.

With that said, particular pre-defined "fields" are a different matter all-together. Most advancements, breakthroughs, and paradigm shifting comes from the "boundaries" of these fields...or a "combination" of "fields."

So I think the better question is whether it is better to work in predefined fields or on something custom tailored for your own interests.

It is much easier to find work in predefined fields, but I think it is better in the long term to do something more tailored for yourself.
 

Grayscale

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 20, 2007
Messages
1,965
MBTI Type
ISTP
to be most efficient, one would need knowledge to handle what is likely to occur.

generalizing and specializing are sort of the same thing if you look at it this way, it is inefficient to take the time to learn something that you are not likely to get a positive return on in the long run, whether that knowledge is very deep, or very wide. it is a waste of time for me to know very specific information about the bumps and facets of human bones if i will probably only use that information once or twice in my lifetime (if ever) for the same reason it is a waste of time for me to know even the basics of underwater basket weaving.

i say, neither! simply put, only know what you need to know. :)
 

nightning

ish red no longer *sad*
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
3,741
MBTI Type
INfj
With that said, particular pre-defined "fields" are a different matter all-together. Most advancements, breakthroughs, and paradigm shifting comes from the "boundaries" of these fields...or a "combination" of "fields."
Mind if I steal that idea?

It is much easier to find work in predefined fields, but I think it is better in the long term to do something more tailored for yourself.
Good enough a reason... laziness. Although it's not the first thing that comes to mind when it comes to being in a specialized field.

to be most efficient, one would need knowledge to handle what is likely to occur.

generalizing and specializing are sort of the same thing if you look at it this way, it is inefficient to take the time to learn something that you are not likely to get a positive return on in the long run, whether that knowledge is very deep, or very wide. it is a waste of time for me to know very specific information about the bumps and facets of human bones if i will probably only use that information once or twice in my lifetime (if ever) for the same reason it is a waste of time for me to know even the basics of underwater basket weaving.

i say, neither! simply put, only know what you need to know. :)
*smacks head* Darn ISTPs never answers the question like they're suppose to.
 
Top