• You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to additional post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), view blogs, respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please join our community today! Just click here to register. You should turn your Ad Blocker off for this site or certain features may not work properly. If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us by clicking here.

[MBTI General] MBTI Phase II: the self-rating thread

Mane

Permabanned
Joined
Jul 2, 2014
Messages
828
To be fair, the actual Step II results report facets on a normalized scale of +30 to -30, effectively. So regardless of the number of items used to calculate the result, they are all normalized to a range.

So if E is minus and I is plus...

Then this:
Initiating: 1 ................ Receiving: 4
Expressive: 2 .............. Contained: 3
Gregarious: 2 .............. Intimate: 3
Active: 1 ....................Reflective: 4
Enthusiastic: 1 .............Quiet: 4

Translates into this:
Initiating/Receiving: 18
Expressive/Contained: 6
Gregarious/Intimate: 6
Active/Reflective: 18
Enthusiastic/Quiet: 18

While this:
Initiating: 4 ................ Receiving: 1
Expressive: 5 .............. Contained: 0
Gregarious: 3 .............. Intimate: 2
Active: 5 ....................Reflective: 0
Enthusiastic: 4 .............Quiet: 1

Translates into this:
Initiating/Receiving: -18
Expressive/Contained: -30
Gregarious/Intimate: -6
Active/Reflective: -30
Enthusiastic/Quiet: -18

All we are loosing here is resolution/accuracy.

Out of the 28 people who answered, only 5 didn't add up to a total of 5, and at least one of those on principle. I am curious about the rest of the algorithm.
 

fetus

New member
Joined
Mar 22, 2015
Messages
2,575
Enneagram
6w7
EXTRAVERT (13)..................INTROVERT (12)
Initiating: 3 ................ Receiving: 2
Expressive: 5 .............. Contained: 0
Gregarious: 0 .............. Intimate: 5
Active: 1 ....................Reflective: 4
Enthusiastic: 4 .............Quiet: 1




SENSORY (6)..................INTUITIVE (19)
Concrete: 1 ................ Abstract: 4
Realistic: 0 ................ Imaginative: 5
Practical: 2 .............. Conceptual: 3
Experiential: 3 ....................Theoretical: 2
Traditional: 0 .............Original: 5




THINKING (2)..................FEELING (23)
Logical: 0 ................ Empathetic: 5
Reasonable: 0 ................ Compassionate: 5
Questioning: 1 .............. Accommodating: 4
Critical: 1 ....................Accepting: 4
Tough: 0 .............Tender: 5


JUDGING (4)..................PERCEIVING (21)
Systematic: 1 ................ Casual: 4
Planful: 2 ................ Open-Ended: 3
Early Starting: 0 .............. Pressure-Prompted: 5
Scheduled: 0 ....................Spontaneous: 5
Methodical: 1 .............Emergent: 4


ENFP a scratch ahead of INFP.
 

RobinSkye

What Is Life?
Joined
Jul 21, 2015
Messages
572
MBTI Type
INTP
Enneagram
541
Instinctual Variant
sp/sx
EXTRAVERT(13)..................INTROVERT (12)
Initiating: 1 ................ Receiving: 4
Expressive: 4 .............. Contained: 1
Gregarious: 2 .............. Intimate: 3
Active: 3 ....................Reflective: 2
Enthusiastic: 3 .............Quiet: 2


SENSORY (3)..................INTUITIVE (22)
Concrete: 0 ................ Abstract: 5
Realistic: 0 ................ Imaginative: 5
Practical: 2 .............. Conceptual: 3
Experiential: 1 ....................Theoretical: 4
Traditional: 0 .............Original: 5


THINKING (19)..................FEELING (6)
Logical: 4 ................ Empathetic: 1
Reasonable: 3 ................ Compassionate: 2
Questioning: 5 .............. Accommodating: 0
Critical: 4 ....................Accepting: 1
Tough: 3 .............Tender: 2

JUDGING (3)..................PERCEIVING (22)
Systematic: 1 ................ Casual: 4
Planful: 0 ................ Open-Ended: 5
Early Starting: 1 .............. Pressure-Prompted: 4
Scheduled: 1 ....................Spontaneous: 4
Methodical: 0 .............Emergent: 5

EEEIIIINTP. :huh:
 

Carpe Vinum

New member
Joined
Aug 5, 2015
Messages
185
MBTI Type
ISTP
Enneagram
8w7
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp
EXTRAVERT(17)..................INTROVERT (8)
Initiating: 4 ................ Receiving: 1
Expressive: 3 .............. Contained: 2
Gregarious: 3 .............. Intimate: 2
Active: 3 ....................Reflective: 2
Enthusiastic: 4 .............Quiet: 1


SENSORY (16)..................INTUITIVE (9)
Concrete: 3 ................ Abstract: 2
Realistic: 3 ................ Imaginative: 2
Practical: 4 .............. Conceptual: 1
Experiential: 4 ....................Theoretical: 1
Traditional: 2 .............Original: 3


THINKING (13)..................FEELING (12)
Logical: 3 ................ Empathetic: 2
Reasonable: 3 ................ Compassionate: 2
Questioning: 2 .............. Accommodating: 3
Critical: 2 ....................Accepting: 3
Tough: 3 .............Tender: 2

JUDGING (6)..................PERCEIVING (19)
Systematic: 1 ................ Casual: 4
Planful: 1 ................ Open-Ended: 4
Early Starting: 1 .............. Pressure-Prompted: 4
Scheduled: 2 ....................Spontaneous: 3
Methodical: 1 .............Emergent: 4

ESTP, leaning toward ESxP.

T/F scores were almost tied there. Interesting...
 

/DG/

silentigata ano (profile)
Joined
Mar 19, 2009
Messages
4,602
Decided to try this again and compare my current answers to my previous ones.

---

Edit: The following are my answers with the correct scoring method.


Decided to try this again and compare my current answers to my previous ones.

EXTRAVERSION (10)..................INTROVERSION (18)
Moderate introversion preference (8)
1. Initiating: 1 ................ Receiving: 5
2. Expressive: 1 .............. Contained: 4
3. Gregarious: 2 .............. Intimate: 3
Negligible difference (1)
4. Active: 3 ....................Reflective: 4
Negligible difference (1)
5.Enthusiastic: 3 .............Quiet: 2
Negligible difference (1)

SENSING (20)..................INTUITION (2)
Clear sensing preference (18)
1. Concrete: 3 ................ Abstract: 1
2. Realistic: 5 ................ Imaginative: 0
3. Practical: 5 .............. Conceptual: 0
4. Experiential: 5 ....................Theoretical: 0
5. Traditional: 2 .............Original: 1
Negligible/no difference (1)

THINKING (14)..................FEELING (17)
Slight feeling preference (3)
1. Logical: 3 ................ Empathetic: 3
No difference (0)
2. Reasonable: 3 ................ Compassionate: 4
Negligible difference (1)
3. Questioning: 2 .............. Accommodating: 4
4. Critical: 3 ....................Accepting: 2
Negligible difference (1)
5. Tough: 3 .............Tender: 4
Negligible difference (1)

JUDGING (10)..................PERCEIVING (10)
No preference (0)
1. Systematic: 0 ................ Casual: 1
Negligible difference (1)
2. Planful: 3 ................ Open-Ended: 0
3. Early Starting: 2 .............. Pressure-Prompted: 5
4. Scheduled: 3 ....................Spontaneous: 4
Negligible difference (1)
5. Methodical: 2 .............Emergent: 0

New result: ISFX. There appears to be a slight P lean though due to more P traits.

I tend to enjoy forced choice more, but it looks like it can skew how I feel about things by over-stating the importance of some traits and diminishing others. With this scoring system, I interestingly do not appear to have any out of preference traits (1 difference is not high enough), though my P/J is a bit messed up for that.

Also interesting... I have more clear P/J traits than T/F traits, yet the T/F dichotomy is more clear than P/J...



----

Here they are with the "incorrect" scoring method (what I originally posted):



----

Old answers from a year ago:


And my current self is annoyed at my past self for not putting subscale scores.
 

/DG/

silentigata ano (profile)
Joined
Mar 19, 2009
Messages
4,602
Btw how is anyone to look at the pressure prompted quality as anything but procrastination?

Edit:. And whoop! After reading the whole thread, it looks like you are not supposed to treat them as mutually exclusive, but rather treat then separately and take the difference between the two. Not sure if doing it that way would affect the overall type that much, but I may fix my scores later.
 

Verona

New member
Joined
May 9, 2016
Messages
590
MBTI Type
INFP
Enneagram
6w5
Instinctual Variant
sp
EXTRAVERT(10)..................INTROVERT (15)
Initiating: 0 ................ Receiving: 5
Expressive: 4 .............. Contained: 1
Gregarious: 2 .............. Intimate: 3
Active: 3 ....................Reflective: 2
Enthusiastic: 1 .............Quiet: 4


SENSORY (8)..................INTUITIVE (17)
Concrete: 0 ................ Abstract: 5
Realistic: 2 ................ Imaginative: 3
Practical: 2 .............. Conceptual: 3
Experiential: 1 ....................Theoretical: 4
Traditional: 3 .............Original: 2


THINKING (5)..................FEELING (20)
Logical: 1 ................ Empathetic: 4
Reasonable: 2 ................ Compassionate: 3
Questioning: 2 .............. Accommodating: 3
Critical: 0 ....................Accepting: 5
Tough: 0 .............Tender: 5

JUDGING (13)..................PERCEIVING (12)
Systematic: 2 ................ Casual: 3
Planful: 3 ................ Open-Ended: 2
Early Starting: 3 .............. Pressure-Prompted: 2
Scheduled: 3 ....................Spontaneous: 2
Methodical: 2 .............Emergent: 3

I think this test is pretty accurate about how I feel about my own typing. I am strongly NF and slightly introverted. The main confusion I have had with typing is in my J and P preferences. When I took the 4 lettered test about 10 years ago I identified with INFJ easily because I think I have a slight preference for J. It is only when I learned about the cognitive functions that I got a bit confused because I identified with Fi over Fe, Ne over Ni, Si over Se and Te over Ti. So in terms of functions I am very much INFP but I still can be a bit more J than most INFPs. I usually find I like to read both INFJ and INFP descriptions if they are not functional based because I relate to both.
 
Top