extraverted Sensing (Se) *************************** (27.9)
average use
introverted Sensing (Si) *************************************** (39.7)
excellent use
extraverted Intuiting (Ne) **************************** (28.9)
average use
introverted Intuiting (Ni) *********************** (23.8)
limited use
extraverted Thinking (Te) *********************************** (35)
good use
introverted Thinking (Ti) ********************************* (33.1)
good use
extraverted Feeling (Fe) *********** (11.5)
unused
introverted Feeling (Fi) **************************************** (40.7)
excellent use
Summary Analysis of Profile
By focusing on the strongest configuration of cognitive processes, your pattern of responses most closely matches individuals of this type: ISTJ
If these cognitive processes don't fit well then consider these types: ESTJ, or INFP
Corresponding best-fit temperaments based on your profile: Improviser; secondly Stabilizer; then Theorist; and lastly, Catalyst.
--
Haha, I always get this. I tried to be honest this time. INFP as a secondary type? Hmm.
average use
introverted Sensing (Si) *************************************** (39.7)
excellent use
extraverted Intuiting (Ne) **************************** (28.9)
average use
introverted Intuiting (Ni) *********************** (23.8)
limited use
extraverted Thinking (Te) *********************************** (35)
good use
introverted Thinking (Ti) ********************************* (33.1)
good use
extraverted Feeling (Fe) *********** (11.5)
unused
introverted Feeling (Fi) **************************************** (40.7)
excellent use
Summary Analysis of Profile
By focusing on the strongest configuration of cognitive processes, your pattern of responses most closely matches individuals of this type: ISTJ
If these cognitive processes don't fit well then consider these types: ESTJ, or INFP
Corresponding best-fit temperaments based on your profile: Improviser; secondly Stabilizer; then Theorist; and lastly, Catalyst.
--
Haha, I always get this. I tried to be honest this time. INFP as a secondary type? Hmm.