Eff all ya'll geniuses. It took me a forever to figure out. What an inefficient system, I'd make their asses swim.
User Tag List
Thread: The Japanese IQ Test

11202009, 12:12 AM #11Kantgirl: Just say "I'm feminine and I'll punch anyone who says otherwise!"
Halla74: Think your way through the world. Feel your way through life.
Cimarron: maybe Prpl will be your girlbud
prplchknz: i don't like it
In Search Of... ... Kiwi Sketch Art ... Dream Journal ... Kyuuei's Cook book ... Kyu's Tiny House Blog ... Minimalist Challenge ... Kyu's Savings Challenge

11202009, 01:28 AM #12
Nice one. I wonder how the fuck does a parent beat a child up while there's a policeman standing two steps away, but that's another story...

11202009, 03:20 PM #13

11202009, 03:29 PM #14
Good choice, Chosen one. If I were a bit smarter I'd of just consulted the internetz for the answer!
Kantgirl: Just say "I'm feminine and I'll punch anyone who says otherwise!"
Halla74: Think your way through the world. Feel your way through life.
Cimarron: maybe Prpl will be your girlbud
prplchknz: i don't like it
In Search Of... ... Kiwi Sketch Art ... Dream Journal ... Kyuuei's Cook book ... Kyu's Tiny House Blog ... Minimalist Challenge ... Kyu's Savings Challenge

11202009, 04:33 PM #15PhantonymGuest

11212009, 08:02 AM #16
I did it.
I think the interesting thing is not IF you did find it, but HOW did you find it.
Friday morning I read the riddle and played a few minutes with the application. Right away, I knew that if there was a solution, there would be two solutions. (Take one, interchange father and sons with mother and daughters and you have the second. That's symmetry.)
I logged off because I had to prepare lessons and give a lesson. On my way to the school I thought about the riddle and after 5 minutes I found something I thought was a solution.
Today I checked my 'solution', finding a kink in it and correcting it, finding a real solution.
Edit: kyuuei's solution with trialanderror is just another method. You could also make a tree of possible first steps etc...

11212009, 08:12 AM #17

11212009, 03:42 PM #18
I just used careful process of elimination. There wasn't much in the way of long dead ends. The rest of this post is how I worked the problem, in invisible font.
Code:
P1 = A parent
p11 = the first samegender child of that parent
p12 = the other samegender child
P2 = The other parent
p21 = the first same gender child
p22 = the second same gender child
C1 = Police Officer
c1 = Criminal
Step one:
Neither parent can go across alone as that would lead the other parent to attack a child. If the parents go across together, they would have to return together to prevent an attack, which would lead to a useless ad infinitum. The only person capable of going across, then, is C1. Given that he cannot leave c1 with others, he must go across with c1.
Therefore, the first step is:
C1+c1 >
Step two:
Given that he is the only one capable of operating the boat, C1 must return. Bringing the criminal back would undo the only possible progression, and thus is necessary. C1 must travel back alone.
Therefore, the second step is
< C1
Step three:
Given that c1 will attack anyone without the presence of C1, C1 must go. If either parent leaves, a child will be attacked. The problem with both parents leaving is the same as in step 1. C1 must leave with p11
Therefore, the third step is:
C1+p11 >
Step 4:
As with Step 2, C1 is the only boat operator. Leaving p11 and c1 together is not possible, so the cop must go back with one of them. going with p11 would undo the last step, so he must return with c1.
Therefore, the fourth step is:
< C1+c1
Step 5:
If the cop were to leave, he would have to leave with the criminal, which would undo the last step. The parents still cannot leave together. As a result, one parent must leave. To prevent "child abuse," P1 must leave with p12.
Therefore, the fifth step is:
P1+p12 >
Step 6:
The parent must return as only he can operate the boat. If the parent leaves with either child, he will negate the last step. He must proceed back alone.
Therefore, the sixth step is:
< P1
Step 7:
If P1 leaves alone, it will negate the last step. If P2 goes with anyone except P1, child abuse will result. If C1 goes with anyone but c1, the criminal will harm someone. If C1 goes with c1, he would have to come back the same way, which is redundant. By process of elimination, P1 must go across with P2.
Therefore, the seventh step is:
P1+P2 >
Step 8:
The parents leaving together would undo the last step. P1 going across without P2 would result in child abuse. P2 going across alone, however, would not.
Therefore, the eighth step is:
< P2
Step 9:
P2 going across alone would undo the last step. P2 going across with a child would require the step to then be undone or for both parents to return together. However, if both parents then returned together, the only possible step would be C1+c1 >, which could only then be undone. P2 cannot cross. The only other boat operator is C1, who must cross with the criminal.
Therefore, the ninth step is:
C1+c1 >
Step 10:
If C1 goes back, he must take the criminal, which would undo the last step. P1 must go across. While P1 could carry p12 back with him, the step would then have to be undone or the parents would cross together, at which point the parents would then have to cross back together again to prevent child abuse. The only possible solution here is for P1 to cross alone.
Therefore, the tenth step is:
< P1
Step 11:
If P1 one does not leave, P2 must, which would require at least one child remain, to be abused. P1 must leave. Leaving with a child of the opposite gender would be abusive, and leaving alone would undo the last step, so P1 must cross with P2.
Therefore, the eleventh step is:
P1+P2 >
Step 12:
C1 returning would be redundant, P1 going without P2 would be abusive. P1 going with P2 would then require P1 and P2 to cross the river again to prevent abuse, which be redundant. P2, by process of elimination, must cross. Crossing with anyone other than P1 would result in abuse or criminal attacks, so P2 must cross alone.
Therefore, the twelfth step is:
< P2
Step 13:
P2 returning alone would be redundant, so P2 must cross with p21.
Therefore, the thirteenth step is:
P2+p21 >
Step 14:
If P2 goes with p21, the last step would be undone. If P2 goes with P1, then they must return together to prevent abuse. If P2 goes without P2, abuse results. P2 cannot cross. If P1 goes with anyone except P2, abuse also results. Only C1 can return, and they must so do with the criminal to prevent harm.
Therefore, the fourteenth step is:
< C1+c1
Step 15:
C1, being the only boat operator on the same side of the river, must cross. Crossing alone results in harm. Crossing with the criminal is redundant, so C1 must cross with p22.
Therefore, the fifteenth step is:
C1+p22 >
Step 16:
If either parent goes across, child abuse results, unless P1 and P2 go together, resulting in a criminal attack. C1 must cross, and without P1 or P2. Taking a child would essentially negate the last step, so C1 must go alone.
Therefore, the sixteenth step is:
< C1
Step 17:
C1 going alone would negate the last step, so he must cross with c1.
Therefore, the seventeenth and last step is:
C1+c1 >
If a deaf INFP falls in the forest and no one is around to hear it, does it make a sound?

11212009, 04:03 PM #19
Just think through it logically. Family has to be together, and the thief has to be with the policeman. Duh.
If you are interested in language, words, linguistics, or foreign languages, check out my blog and read, post, and/or share.

11212009, 04:12 PM #20
If you think that was hard, just see what logic puzzles await you in some books. Holy crap. Make your head hurt....With dozens of possibilities and shit if you don't use your logical faculties...Really have to concentrate.
If you are interested in language, words, linguistics, or foreign languages, check out my blog and read, post, and/or share.
Similar Threads

The Japanese Demon Profile Test
By Wade Wilson in forum Online Personality TestsReplies: 20Last Post: 03252017, 04:27 PM 
[NT] one of the hard iq test to answer
By aydgre in forum MyersBriggs and Jungian Cognitive FunctionsReplies: 1Last Post: 03222015, 01:38 AM 
[NT] one of the hardest iq test to answer
By aydgre in forum The NT Rationale (ENTP, INTP, ENTJ, INTJ)Replies: 11Last Post: 03182015, 09:33 AM 
The personality defect test
By Sahara in forum Online Personality TestsReplies: 418Last Post: 07282014, 04:18 AM