The Cognitive Profile Inventory

[Giggly]

SF 1.0
ST 0.721
NT 0.377
NF 0.180

 

[Orangey]

SF 0.109
ST 0.414
NT 1.0
NF 0.890

 

[Eric B]

SF 0.254
ST 0.423
NT 0.677
NF 1.0

Look at this:

NF's are the most inventive. Albert Einstein was undoubtedly NF. Who but an NF would picture himself riding on a beam of light through space, wondering what he would see? NF's are perhaps the world's greatest resource of new technologies and ideas.

 

[Moiety]

^NF masonry?


I'm surprised at the SF score. What gives...

 

[NewEra]

In order:
ST: 1.0
NT: 0.755
NF: 0.387
SF: 0.224

 

[Owl]

SF: .255
ST: .311
NF: 1.0
NT: 1.0

?

They cut the tip off of my triangle!

I'd like to know what the creator was thinking when he created this test.

How would he interpret this?

 

[Saslou]

SF 1.0
ST 0.975
NT 0.268
NF 0.341

Ohhhhh. Interesting.

 

[Phantonym]

SF 0.377
ST 0.641
NT 0.528
NF 1.0

 

[garbage]

How would he interpret this?

Being very drawn toward intuition?

 

[Dwigie]

SF: 0.472
SJ:0.324
NT:0.283
NF:1.0

 

[Thalassa]

In order of strength:

NF 1.0
SF 0.625
NT 0.482
ST 0.410

 

[professor goodstain]

In order of strength:

NF 1.0
SF 0.625
NT 0.482
ST 0.410

i knew it.

 

[Thalassa]

i knew it.

Knew what? That I'm very F?

 

[professor goodstain]

Knew what? That I'm very F?

It's all in the #s.

 

[Thalassa]

It's all in the #s.

What is? Don't be vague. It's pretentious and irritating. Either say what you mean to say, or don't say anything at all.

 

[professor goodstain]

What is? Don't be vague. It's pretentious and irritating. Either say what you mean to say, or don't say anything at all.

It's not so pretentious and irritating if one understands #s and can accept their empirical proof. Even when proving details held within a theory.

 

[Thalassa]

It's not so pretentious and irritating if one understands #s and can accept their empirical proof. Even when proving details held within a theory.

Excuse me, but you are being pretentious and irritating because you still haven't said what it is exactly that you mean to prove.

Is it that I'm a borderline S? Because I'm not. My cognitive test scores are always Fi, Ne, and Ni in the top three spots, with Si and Se further down the line.

Is it that I'm not a T? Um, well, okay Captain Obvious I said I'm already very F.

I would also like to point out that this is just an arbitrary test and it proves nothing. This test is just some on-line quiz that doesn't even group the MBTI types properly i.e. SF and ST instead of SP and SJ.

Numbers have no inherent meaning. They are mere symbols if there are no real concepts represented behind them.

If you have a point, just state it. I'm not exactly sure what you're driving at, and I'd rather not jump to conclusions. It's easier not to jump to conclusions when people just say what they mean. Ahem.

 

[the state i am in]

i LOVED the experience of this test. i felt like it got at preferences very very effectively.

SF 0.415
ST 0.184
NT 0.523
NF 1.0

 

[professor goodstain]

Excuse me, but you are being pretentious and irritating because you still haven't said what it is exactly that you mean to prove.

Is it that I'm a borderline S? Because I'm not. My cognitive test scores are always Fi, Ne, and Ni in the top three spots, with Si and Se further down the line.

Is it that I'm not a T? Um, well, okay Captain Obvious I said I'm already very F.

I would also like to point out that this is just an arbitrary test and it proves nothing. This test is just some on-line quiz that doesn't even group the MBTI types properly i.e. SF and ST instead of SP and SJ.

Numbers have no inherent meaning. There are mere symbols if there are no real concepts represented behind them.

If you have a point, just state it. I'm not exactly sure what you're driving at, and I'd rather not jump to conclusions. It's easier not to jump to conclusions when people just say what they mean. Ahem.

i don't mean to prove anything. The #s from your test already have.

 

[Thalassa]

i don't mean to prove anything. The #s from your test already have.

Oh, I see. You are being a jerk. I thought you were, but the fact that you keep repeating the same vague, meaningless, condecending statement over and over again proves to me that you aren't actually trying to communicate anything meaningful to me, just a completely unprovoked insult that I'm apparently not allowed to be privy to.

Lame.