Feminine Seduction Archetypes Quiz

[Luminous]

Looking at the Pinterest images linked to on the site, I'm wondering if there's some connection to instinctual variants.

The Lover would be clean sx. With stronger sx, someone falls on the left side of the chart, even with it falling last in the stacking.

I'm thinking:
The Sage so/sp
The Huntress sp/sx
The Mystic sx/sp
The Queen sx/so
The Mother sx/sp
The Maiden so/sx

[Hermit of the Forest]

Completely fake email works fine.

The Ingenue

13 Feminine Seduction Archetypes: The "Ingenue" - Women Love Power

[Earl Grey]

I took it! I got the Sage.
The... Wording and the language of this test is... How do I even put it into words. Feels like someone verbally putting on a silken coat over me. Such pretty words.

This was the data I input, by the way:

Put in whatever you want. It doesn't require you to confirm anything.

[Venus Rose]

Your actual stacking need not be related to this (that is, no need to type your instinctual stacking based on this)

For what is worth, I personally did not take this test completely seriously, and like another user already posted, "too sharp boxes" and I don't fit into any of them.

this part of sx 4, for instance, describes me way better than the archetype:

Sexual Fours focus their envy and hypersensitivity in their intimate relationships. They are perhaps the most emotionally intense type of the Enneagram, which is both their gift and their potential downfall. They possess both a capacity and a desire for profound intimacy, and they derive tremendous insight into human nature through the ups and downs of their romantic lives. They have a sultry, sullen quality that can be attractive and mysterious, or at times, off-putting to others. Sexual Fours pour their energy and attention into the object of their affection, often becoming infatuated or even obsessed, sometimes after only one meeting. Sexual chemistry triggers their powerful imaginations, leading them to create enormous expectations of potential partners. Sexual Fours tend to be drawn to people who possess qualities and talents that they believe they lack. They want to complete themselves by associating or merging with the valued other. But this almost never works, so they may also end up envying and resenting their romantic partner for unintentionally reminding them of what they feel they are missing. In any case, Sexual Fours go through tremendous shifts of feeling about their loved ones—everything from idolization to unbridled hatred. Generally speaking, this type is aware of these feelings, including the dark ones, and finds ways to express them, sometimes in self-destructive ways.

the rest of it is slightly questionable
so anyways, people can manifest whatever "sexual archetype" probably regardless of their stacking, and unless you feel like taking it seriously I guess, I wouldn't take it all that seriously

[The Cat]

The Coquette
and the Bohemian tied.

[Luminous]

Your actual stacking need not be related to this (that is, no need to type your instinctual stacking based on this)

For what is worth, I personally did not take this test completely seriously, and like another user already posted, "too sharp boxes" and I don't fit into any of them.

this part of sx 4, for instance, describes me way better than the archetype:


the rest of it is slightly questionable
so anyways, people can manifest whatever "sexual archetype" probably regardless of their stacking, and unless you feel like taking it seriously I guess, I wouldn't take it all that seriously

Whatever. You can disagree, but there are definite imagery archetype trends on those Pinterest boards. What you bolded is in no way distinct to 4 as I completely identify with it too and am not a 4.

[Venus Rose]

Whatever. You can disagree, but there are definite imagery archetype trends on those Pinterest boards. What you bolded is in no way distinct to 4 as I completely identify with it too and am not a 4.

I'm not arguing about how you see yourself, I was simply saying not to type your enneagram instincts based on your test results on this test. I don't have issues with people "linking" x to y etc. in a theoretical fashion, and didn't say that you cannot talk about it.

Also, according to Katherine Fauvre, sx has been put into 4 (see the original description by Ichazo) which may be what's getting people confused. But I don't want to derail this thread by arguing about that.

so yeah.