1. Rowe Enneagram Test.

From Rowe Enneagram Test

My results:
most likely enneagram type: 9
(with wing): 9w1
possible instinctual variant stacking: sx/sp/so

 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 15 5 -18 22 10 13 7 -14 23

 type 1 type 2 type 3 type 4 type 5 type 6 type 7 type 8 type 9 total sp sp sp sp sp sp sp sp sp 3 2 -1 0 5 7 -5 -1 4 14 sexual sexual sexual sexual sexual sexual sexual sexual sexual 2 2 -2 9 2 -2 6 -3 1 15 social social social social social social social social social 0 -6 -2 3 -6 0 1 3 4 -3-- hahaha

2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
6 -39 -21 -12 32 -15 -1 -5 12
most likely enneagram type 5
(with wing) 5w4
possible instinctual variant stacking sx/so/sp

type 1 self-preservation 1 sexual 0 social -11
type 2 self-preservation -5 sexual -10 social -4
type 3 self-preservation -8 sexual -8 social -7
type 4 self-preservation -1 sexual -8 social 1
type 5 self-preservation 6 sexual 1 social 0
type 6 self-preservation 0 sexual -4 social -6
type 7 self-preservation -1 sexual -6 social -5
type 8 self-preservation -6 sexual -3 social -4
type 9 self-preservation 0 sexual 1 social 0

*dies* im sx/so .....

3. Originally Posted by Exolvuntur
*dies* im sx/so .....
Above, Lumi's stacking order by number, from high to low is sx/sp/so, -3/-14/-15

Yours is sp: -14, sx: -37, soc: -35 so it'd be in this order, sp/so/sx but is listed down as sx/so/sp. Either I am dying of sleepiness or something is wrong w/ the test.

4. Originally Posted by Ixaerus
Above, Lumi's stacking order by number, from high to low is sx/sp/so, -3/-14/-15

Yours is sp: -14, sx: -37, soc: -35 so it'd be in this order, sp/so/sx but is listed down as sx/so/sp. Either I am dying of sleepiness or something is wrong w/ the test.
it is all the negative numbers... it threw it off.

5. Originally Posted by Ixaerus
Above, Lumi's stacking order by number, from high to low is sx/sp/so, -3/-14/-15

Yours is sp: -14, sx: -37, soc: -35 so it'd be in this order, sp/so/sx but is listed down as sx/so/sp. Either I am dying of sleepiness or something is wrong w/ the test.
For mine, sx(15)/sp(14)/so(-3). You got a lot of negative numbers, Ix. Lol I think Exo is right and that threw off the order.

6. Weird. 1, 4, and 9 are not unexpected, but sx dom is something I've never considered as even remotely possible for myself.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
7 -13 -11 12 -1 -3 -6 -11 5
most likely enneagram type 4
(with wing) 4w5
possible instinctual variant stacking sx/sp/so

type 1 self-preservation 4 sexual 0 social -3
type 2 self-preservation -2 sexual 3 social -6
type 3 self-preservation -3 sexual -2 social -2
type 4 self-preservation 3 sexual 3 social -1
type 5 self-preservation 3 sexual 0 social 0
type 6 self-preservation 1 sexual -1 social -3
type 7 self-preservation -6 sexual 2 social -4
type 8 self-preservation -4 sexual -6 social -3
type 9 self-preservation 0 sexual 1 social -2

Edit: My totals are:
sp= -4
sx= 0
so = -24

7. 1: 10
2: -4
3: -1
4: 16
5: 12
6: 3
7: 1
8: -10
9: 4

sx/sp/so

8. most likely enneagram type 5
(with wing) 5w6
possible instinctual variant stacking so/sp/sx

 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 -39 -62 -57 -55 -28 -38 -54 -48 -45

type 1 self-preservation -5 sexual -9 social -12
type 2 self-preservation -11 sexual -11 social -12
type 3 self-preservation -9 sexual -12 social -11
type 4 self-preservation -10 sexual -12 social -9
type 5 self-preservation -10 sexual -11 social 0
type 6 self-preservation -12 sexual -11 social -8
type 7 self-preservation -8 sexual -8 social -12
type 8 self-preservation -12 sexual -12 social -8
type 9 self-preservation -4 sexual -12 social -6

9. It’s a tie between E3 and E7 again lol

 most likely enneagram type 3 (with wing) 3w2 possible instinctual variant stacking so/sx/sp

 type 1 self-preservation -1 sexual 0 social -4 type 2 self-preservation -7 sexual 4 social 8 type 3 self-preservation -3 sexual 3 social 6 type 4 self-preservation 5 sexual 3 social 0 type 5 self-preservation -1 sexual -6 social 1 type 6 self-preservation -4 sexual 6 social -7 type 7 self-preservation -3 sexual 7 social 2 type 8 self-preservation 5 sexual -3 social 4 type 9 self-preservation 0 sexual -5 social 0

10. Oh lmao, 5 >> 1 > 8 > 9 = 7 > 6 > 3 > 4 > 2, and also sp >> so > sx (so and sx virtually equal too lol) which means, 5w6 1w9 3w4 sp/so

Posting Permissions

• You may not post new threads
• You may not post replies
• You may not post attachments
• You may not edit your posts
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO