User Tag List

First 12345 Last

Results 21 to 30 of 99

  1. #21


    Hear, hear, to the gifs being prohibited, I think its nothing but an annoyance to honest.

    Big gigantic signatures annoy me too but thankfully its easy to conceal them behind a spoiler thing.
    All for ourselves, and nothing for other people, seems, in every age of the world, to have been the vile maxim of the masters of mankind.
    Chapter IV, p. 448. - Adam Smith, Book 3, The Wealth of Nations

  2. #22
    Senior Member Ene's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012


    I think they are fine in a post to make a point. But in signatures they are a bit annoying, especially if they are big and busy. I like the idea of putting them in spoiler tags. That way people have the option of looking or not looking.
    A student said to his master: "You teach me fighting, but you talk about peace. How do you reconcile the two?" The master replied: "It is better to be a warrior in a garden than to be a gardener in a war." - unknown/Chinese
    Likes miss fortune liked this post

  3. #23
    reborn PeaceBaby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    937 so/sx


    Avatars, no. Remember that guy who had the flashing dot as an avatar? *shudders*

    Signatures, spoilered. Save our eyes please.

    In posts, they are a significant burden to load. Slows page load time tremendously.

    Quote Originally Posted by chickpea View Post
    what an awful decision. distracting from what? this is 2015, if gifs are too over-stimulating, you should probably avoid the Internet in general.
    Animated gifs are so 1998 - 2003, actually. They re-popularized the last couple of years as an alternative to video and flash animations, not needing a plug-in to run and being used in fun, meme-like ways. However, as a web developer, they are a headache, as I mentioned slowing page loads and overall site load times. You can't start or stop them of your own volition. Many people who make them don't understand how to size or compress them properly, so they can be very large files. They are a significant reason for site complaints and behind sites crashing out. When the goal is to serve a website quickly, a site full of animations runs counter to efficiency. That's the reason some sites disable them.
    "Remember always that you not only have the right to be an individual, you have an obligation to be one."
    Eleanor Roosevelt

    "When people see some things as beautiful,
    other things become ugly.
    When people see some things as good,
    other things become bad."
    Lao Tzu, Tao Te Ching
    Likes highlander, Ene, Punderstorm liked this post

  4. #24
    Senior Member prplchknz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007


    i thought the issue was always them slowing down the site and that's why we got rid of them. people complain about the site being slow already, if you want more of those complaints sure.
    In no likes experiment.

    that is all

    i dunno what else to say so

  5. #25
    Google "chemtrails" Bush Did 9/11's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    3w4 sp/sx


    The animation doesn't bother me. 1080px-tall image in sigs do. Those are just fine when they're under spoiler tags or something. That's a great balance between "expressing yourself" and "not pissing me off."
    J. Scott Crothers
    Founder, Truthtology, est. 1952
    Prophet and Channel, God Almighty
    Author, the Holy scripture Elevenetics
    Mod, Typology Central

    "Just as jet fuel cannot melt steel beams, so too cannot the unshakeable pillars of Truthtology ever be shaken, whether by man, nature, or evidence."
    - Elevenetics
    Likes miss fortune, Punderstorm liked this post

  6. #26
    Habitual Fi LineStepper JocktheMotie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008


    Quote Originally Posted by Coriolis View Post
    I do.

    Likes magpie, chickpea, cm81, Punderstorm liked this post

  7. #27
    Senior Member Jaguar's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007


    Quote Originally Posted by PeaceBaby View Post
    Remember that guy who had the flashing dot as an avatar? *shudders*

    Of course I remember the seizure inducer.

    I'm not for animated avatars.
    Likes highlander, Punderstorm liked this post

  8. #28
    can't handcuff the wind Z Buck McFate's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    5w4 sx/sp


    Quote Originally Posted by Obsidius View Post
    Animation should be allowed, who in the community even thinks that disabling this is a good decision?

    Quote Originally Posted by Coriolis View Post
    I do.

    Actually, I wouldn't say my position is that they should be disabled so much as there should be an option to turn off animation on the individual member's end. But I'm not sure that's possible.

    I currently have signatures turned off- I can't see anyone's signature- because I personally find ALL that stuff distracting. So as far as signatures go, I don't care. I do think a ceiling should be put on how seizure-inducing flashy an avi can be though, at least until the option to turn it off is available on the individual user end. eta: Because I don't want to have to turn off avis altogether to avoid the super flashy ones- I like recognizing posters by their avi.

    Reality is a collective hunch. -Lily Tomlin

    5w4 sx/sp Johari / Nohari
    Likes Starry, Rambling, Punderstorm liked this post

  9. #29
    Rainy Day Woman MDP2525's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    6w5 sx/sp


    Quote Originally Posted by Jaguar View Post

    Of course I remember the seizure inducer.

    I'm not for animated avatars.
    Thanks, now I'm having a seizurghfhdjridnrjfdkkfkrskdios.
    ~luck favors the ready~
    Likes Jaguar liked this post

  10. #30
    Senior Member Captain_Invincible's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    IDK sx/so


    Personally, I think we should be allowed to keep animated signatures, but they should all be sized down to a default size of around 300x175:

    [size example]

    That way, they're not huge, and taking up so much space and distracting users. I also think that they should be within reason, like others have mentioned. No seizure inducing signatures. No super bright colours that flash, and no super fast moving gifs.

    Does that sound reasonable? Personally, I think it does.

Similar Threads

  1. Smiling in Pictures and MBTI Type
    By thirtyfour in forum Myers-Briggs and Jungian Cognitive Functions
    Replies: 66
    Last Post: 03-08-2011, 11:08 PM
  2. [NT] Differences in ENTP and ENTJ sense of humor
    By sakuraba in forum The NT Rationale (ENTP, INTP, ENTJ, INTJ)
    Replies: 53
    Last Post: 02-20-2009, 08:51 PM
  3. Replies: 12
    Last Post: 01-13-2008, 07:05 PM
  4. How Intuitives (especially IN's) and Sensors look to each other.
    By Athenian200 in forum Myers-Briggs and Jungian Cognitive Functions
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 07-24-2007, 07:56 PM
  5. The difference of the N and the S mind in Art and Music
    By wildcat in forum Myers-Briggs and Jungian Cognitive Functions
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 06-11-2007, 02:22 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO