[MBTI General] Is having an EAGLE eye sign of being a sensor?

[kotoshinohaisha]

Because i have eagle eyes.

Like i can identify someone around. I can sense you easily when you're around. I can easily pin point someone in a crowd because i have eagle eyes..

So? Sensors? Or Intuitives who also have eagle eyes?

 

[Population: 1]

 

[kotoshinohaisha]

What's so effin shocking about

 

[Population: 1]

Perhaps

 

[kotoshinohaisha]

Perhaps

Yeah eagle eyes i have

 

[Doctor Cringelord]

I think Se doms in particular tend to be very good at scanning and picking up on details. There's a reason detective is often listed as a good career choice for ESTP types.

 

[kotoshinohaisha]

I think Se doms in particular tend to be very good at scanning and picking up on details. There's a reason detective is often listed as a good career choice for ESTP types.

That's why i knew how the pervert followed me.

Earlier I've seen him again on the train lol

I have such an eagle eye

 

[Red Memories]

I can't see them in a crowd if I don't know them well, but I remember I saw this person I talked to at the walmart one day. we haven't spoke in like a month. But yeah.
if I saw you once I'd probably forget. Unless you traumatized me.

 

[Gone]

No, it's the Ni eyes. Ni doms are psychic and magically find familiar faces in crowds. So you're obviously a Ni dom.

 

[tchudak]

No, it's the Ni eyes. Ni doms are psychic and magically find familiar faces in crowds. So you're obviously a Ni dom.

agreed.

 

[HisKittyKat]

Jung clearly said NFP types scan their environment and are very observant. Detective- Journalism is often suggested for NPs as a career path. I actually think its more of an Si thing, comparing, scanning connecting the dots and looking for past, present, future patterns. Si combined with Ne at work. NFPs are knowing for picking up on things most people miss due to their scanning habits.

 

[Siúil a Rúin]

I think eagle eyes could be associated with Sensing - Se and Si in different ways. Si sees details through a lens of internalized expectation based on what has been before. They would be good as detectives because they can see a detail that has changed. Se can take in a lot of new information in new situations and process it, which is the reason for the stereotypes that they make good racecar drivers and firefighters.

Sometimes iNtuitives walk into walls and doors. I've walked into poles and doors, but no walls yet.

 

[Norrsken]

I actually read somewhere that sensors can easily pick up and identify even the most intricate details of the object that they've set their eyes on. And its very comfortable and natural for them to do, and are very aware of their surroundings. Intuitives, on the other hand, tend to miss details and can be clumsier in this regard, since their information gathering function (Ne/Ni) is based more on abstract information rather than the concrete.

 

[Norrsken]

To expand what I'm trying to say in my previous post: Sensors can look at an object and can easily see its exact texture, color, and so on, without any intuitive lenses. That object is just a ball, for example, to them, and nothing else.
I can look at a ball and it instead just tells me something else completely, though I understand that it is just a object, it existing has a much more heavier significance to me that is difficult to explain.

 

[Littleclaypot]

Yeah, I would say that's an attribute that most sensors have.
Just one of their super powers.

 

[The Cat]

Not necessarily...I'm not certain it's type related...

 

[ChocolateMoose123]

To expand what I'm trying to say in my previous post: Sensors can look at an object and can easily see its exact texture, color, and so on, without any intuitive lenses. That object is just a ball, for example, to them, and nothing else. I can look at a ball and it instead just tells me something else completely, though I understand that it is just a object, it existing has a much more heavier significance to me that is difficult to explain.

N's and their sym-ball-ism.

 

[Population: 1]

N's and their sym-ball-ism.

 

[Poki]

I need glasses for seeing far. I lost my S back in 7th grade damnit. I am just ITP now.

 

[Poki]

To expand what I'm trying to say in my previous post: Sensors can look at an object and can easily see its exact texture, color, and so on, without any intuitive lenses. That object is just a ball, for example, to them, and nothing else.
I can look at a ball and it instead just tells me something else completely, though I understand that it is just a object, it existing has a much more heavier significance to me that is difficult to explain.

Go ahead, tell me about your childhood problems and the ball