That doesn't make sense?
There are eighteen Sub-Types eighteen energies each distinct and flattered by other dynamics, Tritype and Trifix and instinctual variants.
A 9w1 energy in MBTI energy is simply INFP. You could say INFP Sx/Sp or 9w1 Sx/Sp they are the same two aspects within the same energy flux the two parts being the instinct energy and the 9w1/INFP energy. INFP and 9w1 are the same that is the INFP as a set grouping of four parts four notes resonating. There is a bit of complexity but the basics are the basics.
And don't get stuck thinking that there is just one INFP or one 9w1 there are six deferent INFP's six different 9w1's and the it don't stop there there is the tri-type component so you can add another 12, I think it is, 12 combinations so that's roughly 18 types of 9w1 INFP's.
So we are talking 324 basic personas. No wonder the would is full of dumb people who stick there noses up at my correlations. And I include the so called experts.
It's a no brainer.
How can you not understand?
It's there to be seen or there to be witnessed.
When you look at a rainbow you don't just say colour you as rainbow of colours.
Persona is the same it is not just one flux it is a multiplicity of frequencies that make as a group one flux persona personified.
Don't tell me you can not see it?
Personality is a flux.
Can not you detect that I am partly expressing Te and Fe , and Fi and Ni , and Te and Si within this post?
I wasn't expressing disinterest or sticking my nose up at the theory; I just said I didn't understand some of it. Like the basis of some of the pairups. Like you're saying 5w4 So/Sx is NeTiSiFe(Se). NeTi is an ENTP, (which often comes out 7w8 —which to me corresponds 7="Sanguine in Inclusion"=ENP aka "Get Things Going" Interaction Style, 8=Choleric in Control=NT). You seem to be discussing an INTP (with a "stronger" aux. Ne?), then that would likely be a 5w4, however, it doesn't fit my correlation, because 5 is Melancholy while INTP is Phlegmatic=Choleric (which theoretically should be some 9-8 combo) or Supine Choleric (Supine = 6 or 2 or 4).
So that's what I'm saying. I have the basis for my own correlation, but I don't understand yours, because years ago, when I saw the "ambidextrous function" concept on that page and the similarity of Enneagram to the classic temperaments, I just got that out of it and took it and ran off my own way with it, and never did get into tritypes and other stuff you're using like the disintegration or stress points (which is represented by the star figure, which is not even a geometrically correct enneagram). I did come to look at the tritypes more in recent years, after I gave up trying to correlate Enneatypes with the temperaments. To me, the instinctual variants sounded like the FIRO-B "Areas of need" Inclusion, Control and Affection (i.e. paralleling So, Sp and Sx), and that I should be 6so8sp6sx, but they don't mix that way, so I stopped forcing it. I do seem to come out some sort of 6 a lot of times, but usually strong 5 (as most other NT's), and with either a 4 or 6 wing. Last thing I got on one of the more detailed tests, which is in my signature, is 548 sp/sx (the 4 having an 8w and the 8 having a 9w). I still ned to understand the so/sp/sx more, and the disintegration would be an even more in depth study, to see how or if it fits the temperaments (like I remember reading that 5 disintegrates into 8, or maybe vice versa. Which makes some sense if they are respectively Melancholy and Choleric, because those two temperaments are closely related, in both being "task" focused, and "responding" to people in similar fashions. But I'm not sure the others match like that).
And also, what I've found is the more you tie these different systems together, the harder it will be for people to fit the (now tighter) correlations. That's another reason I gave up the 81 types, where a 4so MUST be a MelancholyPhlegmatic or SupinePhlegmatic in Inclusion, (while a 6so must be a Supine in Inclusion and a 5so must be a Melancholy in Inclusion). It's tricky enough getting type to fit the basic Inclusion/Control correlation, (though I think I've had a fairly good amount of matchups, though if one doesn't match, you eventually have to just let it go as unexplained).
So as an INTP, I might be 5w4, but I might be 5w6. Or 6w5 or 4w5. Would this change (falsify) your dynamic, or are those simply some of the other 18 subtypes you mentioned?
Like what is the basis for making the function of Ne A 4W3? (4 is often associated with Fi, but then this isn't consistent, as INFJ's also fit into it a lot of the time, and even some INTP's!)
What you're saying sounds like INFP IS 9w1, but then you seem to be saying there's six of every enneagram type and MBTI type (in addition to the tritypes which I thought made it 9 for each, like 5 can be 528, 529, 521, 538, 539, 531, 548, 549, 541, and then can't those last two be reversed as well?), and that's also where I'm seeing something that I'm not sure of what you mean. (What are these six of each type?)
But that's what I mean, in that I had not read your whole theory. But then you're saying it's a "no-brainer", but things like this aren't. It's abstract, where you're comparing them to concrete (sensory) things like rainbows. There's only one set of colors in the visible spectrum, but many different ways to break down personality.
Again, I'm not dismissing what you're saying; Im just saying I'm not able at this time to really understand your whole correlation. Maybe you did explain it above, or ont he page, so I would have to sit down and read them again. (I'm often in a rush to work, or to bed when responding).
Plus, with Ti, you have to internalize a set of principles (i.e. senses of what's "correct" that you figure yourself, rather than just take from others or what objects dictate themselves), so when something else comes along you have not internalized, it may take time to "digest" it, for it to "register". This is why INTP's often struggle learning in conventional classroom settings. And I often find it hard to get a lot of other INTP's to get or at least respond to what I'm saying. They usually have their own logical "frameworks" they have settled on, and don't have time or room to take in something else that differs.
As far as "expressing" different functions (as it "look at the functions I'm/he's/she's, etc. "using"), that doesn't necessarily prove type. We all express all of them, and where type comes in is which ego states are involved in a particular situation. An INTP in his natural "herioc" ego state will express Ti. In the "supporting" (aux.) state, Ne. In a more inferior state, Fe. In a "obstruction-removing" or "hero-backing" state, Te. Otherwise, the products of the different functions will be present in all the data we are relaying. (So it doesn't mean the type has an ambidextrous preference. If ambidextrousness is true, what it changes are what perspectives the ego states align with).
So I think your ideas are interesting, and may have something to it, but just needing to understand it fully.
