Would that indicate high sensing or what?

[kangaroo2003]

I love designing maps of the strategy games, which is very detailed work, I could spend hours on it. However, I always rush doing maths, do not follow procedures, and tend to miss details.

99% sure of being either ENTJ or INTP tho.

 

[Cellmold]

More likely to do with a technical fulfillment of some sort. I'd say Ti.

 

[Doctor Cringelord]

seems indicative of Ti and/or Si

 

[kangaroo2003]

Could ENTJ be like that? My friend is INTP, and I see a clear contrast between FE and FI, which means I must be TE user.

 

[Doctor Cringelord]

Could ENTJ be like that? My friend is INTP, and I see a clear contrast between FE and FI, which means I must be TE user.

elaborate.

 

[kangaroo2003]

elaborate.

I am between intp and entj, and while it seems I prefer Se, Ni, Fi, I still question whether It's Ti, or Te, as it seems I relate to both very highly.

Can ENTJ's be detailed at times? Also, would they ever create a thread critiquing something, what doesn't make sense to them?

 

[Doctor Cringelord]

Can ENTJ's be detailed at times?

I suppose it would depend on the scenario. If they were articulating or working on a system of great importance to them, I think they could get "down and dirty" with some details.

Also, would they ever create a thread critiquing something, what doesn't make sense to them?

Again, depends more on the person and the scenario. I don't see how this would indicate type.

 

[Kensei]

What you enjoy doing/your interests do not determine type. The question is why do you enjoy making strategy maps? Si would prefer it for the routine details or to fufill tradition, Se would like it for the thrill of war if there was a war to create them for. Either one of those can indicate high sensing. Normally I think the average person making strategy maps would be Te auxillary, if there was no reason behind other than sheer enjoyment of the activity alone.

 

[fetus]

That sounds like something I would do. Though not necessarily strategy; I just love creating different worlds of my own. I agree with [MENTION=24567]Kensei[/MENTION], anyone can enjoy any activity. Most of it is just personal preference.

 

[kangaroo2003]

What you enjoy doing/your interests do not determine type. The question is why do you enjoy making strategy maps? Si would prefer it for the routine details or to fufill tradition, Se would like it for the thrill of war if there was a war to create them for. Either one of those can indicate high sensing. Normally I think the average person making strategy maps would be Te auxillary, if there was no reason behind other than sheer enjoyment of the activity alone.

Hm, I guess when I think about why I do that, it's not because it's so fun. I did that as there were no good map makers playing that game, so that was an opportunity to achieve - get popular among that community. Years after, I am very well know here for my maps, yet not playing it anymore. Anyway, that is definitely interesting, and I always make it perfect, leaving no chances to others.

 

[Kensei]

Based on that reason, you mist likely use either a sensing function or a function with a judging orientation, since that reason sounds very goal-minded. If you were Ne or something not very goal minded, you would probably not care much for acheivement, but would care more about the mental stimulation of it, since they are basically scatterbrained, right brained thinkers, and unlike the left brain thinking that judgers demonstrate, they don't get up with a task on their mind, they just live ad let live.

Hm, I guess when I think about why I do that, it's not because it's so fun. I did that as there were no good map makers playing that game, so that was an opportunity to achieve - get popular among that community. Years after, I am very well know here for my maps, yet not playing it anymore. Anyway, that is definitely interesting, and I always make it perfect, leaving no chances to others.

 

[Doctor Cringelord]

What you enjoy doing/your interests do not determine type. The question is why do you enjoy making strategy maps? Si would prefer it for the routine details or to fufill tradition, Se would like it for the thrill of war if there was a war to create them for. Either one of those can indicate high sensing. Normally I think the average person making strategy maps would be Te auxillary, if there was no reason behind other than sheer enjoyment of the activity alone.

I loved making imaginary maps as a kid. I liked drawing borders, mountains, rivers, cities, etc, then giving cultural identities and historical background to the imaginary nations and residents of these maps. I don't think it indicated Te though, because it wasn't for the purpose of strategy.

I also used to be quite good at copying maps out of geography textbooks from memory. Probably an indicator of Si, I dunno. Sometimes I created alternate/parallel world maps with borders drawn as though history had taken different courses (i.e. the Roman Empire survived to the 20th century)...Ne?

I enjoy "mapping" out how I will level characters in Skyrim or similar games. There is a great deal of strategy involved, so I could see how this might be Te-related.